Antibodies titration for immunized pregnant women: Conventional tube test or gel microcolumn assay

Transfusion

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1200-

  Duez, Alexis ^a   Flourié, Françoise ^b   Garraud, Olivier ^c  

^a HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^b Laboratoire d'Immuno Hématologie   (France)

^c ETABLISSEMENT FRANÇAIS DU SANG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOANTIBODY; RHESUS C ANTIBODY; RHESUS D ANTIBODY; RHESUS E ANTIBODY;

ANTIBODY SCREENING; ANTIBODY TITER; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY REACTION; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD COMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUP KELL SYSTEM; BLOOD GROUP TYPING; CONVENTIONAL TUBE TEST; COOMBS TEST; GEL MICROCOLUMN ASSAY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PREGNANT WOMAN; SEROLOGY;

ANTIBODIES; BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNIZATION; IMMUNOASSAY; PREGNANCY; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 84898612029     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12528     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Finck R, Deguzman-Lui C, Teng S, et al. Comparison of a gel microcolumn assay with the conventional tube test for red blood cell alloantibody titration. Transfusion 2013; 53: 811-815.
2. Novaretti MC, Jens E, Pagliarini T, et al. Comparison of conventional tube test with Diamed gel microcolumn assay for anti-D titration. Clin Lab Haematol 2003; 25: 311-315. (Pubitemid 37211237)
3. Thakur MK, Marwaha N, Kumar P, et al. Comparison of gel test and conventional tube test for antibody detection and titration in D-negative women: study from a tertiary-care hospital in North India. Immunohematology 2010; 26: 174-177.
4. Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD,. Technical manual. 17th ed. Bethesda (MD): American Association of Blood Banks; 2011.