Association of note quality and quality of care: A cross-sectional study

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 406-413

  Edwards, Samuel T ^a,b,c   Neri, Pamela M ^d   Volk, Lynn A ^d   Schiff, Gordon D ^b,c   Bates, David W ^b,c  

^a Massachusetts Veteran's Epidemiology Research and Information Center Veteran's Affairs Boston Healthcare System ^*  (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CARDIOLOGY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA EXTRACTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ENDOCRINOLOGIST; ENDOCRINOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE;

EID: 84898611581     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002194     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Siegler EL. The evolving medical record. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:671-7.
2. Pollard SE, Neri PM, Wilcox AR, et al. How physicians document outpatient visit notes in an electronic health record. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82;39-46.
3. Reiser SJ. The clinical record in medicine. Part 2: Reforming content and purpose. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:980-5.
4. Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968;278:593-600.
5. Reiser SJ. The clinical record in medicine. Part 1: Learning from cases. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:902-7.
6. Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Gorden SM. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:245-51.
7. Logan JR, Gorman PN, Middleton B. Measuring the quality of medical records: A method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data. Proc AMIA Symp 2001;408-12.
8. Hogan WR, Wagner MM. Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:342-55.
9. Wagner MM, Hogan WR. The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3:234-44.
10. Stetson PD, Morrison FP, Bakken S, et al. Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534-41.
11. Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, et al. Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db98. htm
12. Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors N Engl J Med 2010;362:1066-9.
13. Hartzband P, Groopman J. Off the record - avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1656-8.
14. Wrenn JO, Stein DM, Bakken S, et al. Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:49-53.
15. Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, et al. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: Perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:300-9.
16. Soto CM, Kleinman KP, Simon SR. Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:22.
17. Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: Prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:391-5.
18. Stetson PD, Bakken S, Wrenn JO, et al. Assessing electronic note quality using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164-74.
19. Dawes KS. Survey of general practice records. Br Med J 1972;3:219-23.
20. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barrón Y, et al. Accuracy of electronically reported 'meaningful use' clinical quality measures: A cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:77-83.
21. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A prospective validation study of methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283:1715-22.
22. Roth CP, Lim Y-W, Pevnick JM, et al. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record. Am J Med Qual 2009;24:385-94.
23. Shoolin J, Ozeran L, Hamann C, et al. Association of medical directors of information systems consensus on inpatient electronic health record documentation. Appl Clin Inform 2013;4:293-303.