A risk assessment model for water resources: Releases of dangerous and hazardous substances

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 140, Issue , 2014, Pages 51-59

  Rebelo, Anabela ^a   Ferra, Isabel ^b   Gonçalves, Isolina ^b   Marques, Albertina M ^b  

^a Portuguese Environment Agency ARH Algarve   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Critical factors; Hazard sources; Risk assessment; Water resources

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER POLLUTION; SURFACE WATERS;

CRITICAL FACTORS; DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES; DOMESTIC USE; HAZARD SOURCE; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING; RISK ASSESSMENT - MODELLING; RISKS ASSESSMENTS; SIMPLE++; WATERS RESOURCES;

HAZARDS;

GROUND WATER; SURFACE WATER; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; DANGEROUS GOODS; WATER POLLUTANT;

BIOACCUMULATION; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; DOMESTIC WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; HAZARDOUS WASTE; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SITE INVESTIGATION; SURFACE WATER; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; WATER RESOURCE;

AQUIFER; ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; DANGEROUS GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLOODING; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR WATER RESOURCE; RIVER; STREAM (RIVER); WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTANT;

CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 84898609054     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.025     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahlroth S., Nilsson M., Finnveden G., Hjelm O., Hochschorner E. Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments. J.Clean. Prod. 2011, 19:145-156.
2. Almasri M.N., Kaluarachchi J.J. Multi-criteria decision analysis for the optimal management of nitrate contamination of aquifers. J.Environ. Manage. 2005, 74:365-381.
3. Baderna D., Maggioni S., Boriani E., Gemma S., Molteni M., Lombardo a, Colombo a, Bordonali S., Rotella G., Lodi M., Benfenati E. Acombined approach to investigate the toxicity of an industrial landfill's leachate: chemical analyses, risk assessment and invitro assays. Environ. Res. 2011, 111:603-613.
4. Bossert I.D., Compeau G.C. Cleanup of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in soil. Microbial Transformation and degradation of toxic organic chemicals 1995, 77-125. Wiley-Liss, New York. L.Y. Young, C. Cerniglia (Eds.).
5. Chen Z., Li H., Ren H., Xu Q., Hong J. Atotal environmental risk assessment model for international hub airports. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2011, 29:856-866.
6. Chen Z., Zhao L., Lee K. Environmental risk assessment of offshore produced water discharges using a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:782-792.
7. Daginnus K., Gottardo S., Payá-Pérez A., Whitehouse P., Wilkinson H., Zaldívar J.-M. Amodel-based prioritisation exercise for the European water framework directive. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2011, 8:435-455.
8. Economic European Communities Communication from the Commission to the Council of 17 July 1982 on dangerous substances which might be included in List I of Council Directive 76/464/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Commun. 1982, C 176:3-10.
9. Eliasson A., Rinaldi F.M., Linde N. Multicriteria decision aid in supporting decisions related to groundwater protection. Environ. Manage. 2003, 32:589-601.
10. European Commission Directive 2006/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community (Codified version). Off. J. Eur. Commun. 2006, L 64:52-59.
11. European Commission Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Commun. 2008, L 348:84-97.
12. European Communities Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market, Part II, EUR 20418 EN/2 2003, European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra.
13. Fairman R., Mead C.D., Williams W.P. Environmental risk assessment: Approaches, Experiences and Information sources 1998, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
14. Gormley Á., Pollard S., Rocks S., Black E. Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management - Green Leaves III 2011, Cranfield University and Defra, Bedfordshire.
15. Gouldson A., Morton A., Pollard S.J.T. Better environmental regulation - contributions from risk-based decision-making. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407:5283-5288.
16. Great Britain The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999 n° SI 1999/743 1999, The Stationery Office.
17. Great Britain The Control of Major Accident Hazards (Amendment) Regulations 2005 n° SI 2005/1088 2005, The Stationery Office.
18. Gutiérrez S., Fernandez C., Barata C., Tarazona J.V. Forecasting risk along a river basin using a probabilistic and deterministic model for environmental risk assessment of effluents through ecotoxicological evaluation and GIS. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408:294-303.
19. Heise S., Förstner U. Risk assessment of contaminated sediments in river basins - theoretical considerations and pragmatic approach. J.Environ. Monit. 2007, 9:943-952.
20. Huang I.B., Keisler J., Linkov I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:3578-3594.
21. Ishizaka A., Lusti M. How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Re. 2006, 14:387-400.
22. Kappes M.S., Papathoma-Köhle M., Keiler M. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32:577-590.
23. Khalili N.R., Duecker S. Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework. J.Clean. Prod. 2013, 47:188-198.
24. Lemming G., Hauschild M., Bjerg P. Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: literature review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2010, 15:115-127.
25. Li Y., Li J., Chen S., Diao W. Establishing indices for groundwater contamination risk assessment in the vicinity of hazardous waste landfills in China. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 165:77-90.
26. Lohani B.N., Evans J.W., Everitt R.R., Ludwig H., Carpenter R.A., Tu S.-L. Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia. Overview 1997, vol. 1. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
27. Magnuson M.L., Kelty C.A., Urbansky E.T., Owens J.H., Kelty K.C., Speth T.F. Examples of the role of analytical chemistry in environmental risk management research. J.Environ. Monit. 2002, 4:102-108.
28. Marshall R., Fischer T.B. Best practice use of SEA - industry, energy and sustainable development. Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment 2005, 673-690. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. M. Schmidt, E. João, E. Albrecht (Eds.).
29. Pathak D.R., Hiratsuka A., Awata I., Chen L. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57:1569-1578.
30. Pavlis M., Cummins E., McDonnell K. Groundwater vulnerability assessment of plant protection products: a review. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2010, 16:621-650.
31. Ram C., Montibeller G. Exploring the impact of evaluating strategic options in a scenario-based multi-criteria framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2013, 80:657-672.
32. Ramanathan R., Ramanathan U. Aqualitative perspective to deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Omega 2010, 38:228-232.
33. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource allocation 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York. first ed.
34. Saidi S., Bouri S., Ben Dhia H. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Hajeb-jelma aquifer (Central Tunisia) using a GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 59:1579-1588.
35. Sanscartier D., Margni M., Reimer K., Zeeb B. Comparison of the secondary environmental impacts of three remediation alternatives for a diesel-contaminated site in Northern Canada. Soil. Sediment. Contam. 2010, 19:338-355.
36. Schaeffer A., Hollert H., Ratte H.T., Ross-Nickoll M., Filser J., Matthies M., Oehlmann J., Scheringer M., Schulz R., Seitz A. An indispensable asset at risk: merits and needs of chemicals-related environmental sciences. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2009, 16:410-413.
37. Schuwirth N., Reichert P., Lienert J. Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: a case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 220:472-483.
38. Sizirici B., Tansel B., Kumar V. Knowledge based ranking algorithm for comparative assessment of post-closure care needs of closed landfills. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:1232-1238.
39. Slater D., Jones H. Environmental risk assessment and the environment agency. J.Hazard. Mater. 1999, 65:77-91.
40. Topuz E., Talinli I., Aydin E. Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: a quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers. Environ. Int. 2011, 37:393-403.
41. Tristán E., Demetriades A., Ramsey M.H., Rosenbaum M.S., Stavrakis P., Thornton I., Vassiliades E., Vergou K. Spatially resolved hazard and exposure assessments: an example of lead in soil at Lavrion, Greece. Environ. Res. 2000, 82:33-45.
42. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.Inland Transport Committee ADR 2011 the European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road 2011 2010, United Nations, New York.
43. Zhao L., Chen Z., Lee K. Arisk assessment model for produced water discharge from offshore petroleum platforms-development and validation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56:1890-1897.