CSE as epistemic technologies: Computer modeling and disciplinary difference in the humanities

Handbook of Research on Computational Science and Engineering: Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 567-586

  Ratto, Matt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898550511     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-116-0.ch023     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Bateson, G. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Jason Aronson Inc.
2. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1, 251-264. doi:10.1002/bs.3830010402.
3. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulation and simulacra. University of Michigan Press.
4. Bloor, D. (1981). II.2 the strengths of the strong programme. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 199-213. doi:.doi:10.1177/004839318101100206.
5. Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Bowker, G. C. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences (Star, S. L., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Collins, H. M. (1981). Knowledge and controversy: Studies in modern natural science. [Special Issue]. Social Studies of Science, 11(1).
8. Collins, H. M., & Yearly, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In Pickering, A. (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301-326). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Dascal, M. (1998). The study of controversies and the theory and history of science. Science in Context, 11, 147-155. doi:10.1017/S0269889700002957.
10. Frischer, B., Niccolucci, F., Ryan, N., & Barceló, J. (2002). From CVR to CVRO: The past, present, and future of cultural virtual reality. British Archaeological Reports, 834, 7-18.
11. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Galison, P., & Stump, D. J. (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford University Press.
13. Hooker, C. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. SUNY Press.
14. Kamermans, H. (2000). Land evaluation as predictive modelling: A deductive approach. In G. Lock (Ed.), Beyond the map. Archaeology and spatial technologies. NATO Science Series, Series A: Life Sciences, 321, 124-146. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press/Ohmsha.
15. Kamermans, H. (2003). Predictive maps and land quality mapping. In J. Kunow & J. Müller (Eds.), Symposium: The Archaeology of Landscapes and Geographic Information Systems. Predictive Maps, Settlement Dynamics and Space and Territory in Prehistory. Forschungen zur Archäologie im Land Brandenburg 8. Archäoprognose Brandenburg I. Brandenburgisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologisches Landesmuseum, Wünsdorf, (pp. 151-160).
16. Knoop, R. R. (1996). The Satricum Corpus of architectural terracottas. Deliciae Fictiles II: Second International Conference on Archaic Architectural Terracottas from Italy, Rome, Thesis Publishers.
17. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Kohler, T. A., & Parker, S. C. (1986). Predictive models for archaeological resource location. In Schiffer, M. B. (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 9, pp. 397-452). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Lulof, P. (2003). Pre-Roman temples in Central Italy. Archaeological Reality and virtual reconstruction. 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology. Groningen, the Netherlands.
21. Lulof, P., & Knoop, R. R. (2005). Bulls on the roof: Addenda to the Campanian roof at Satricum. In Mols, S. T. A. M., & Moormann, E. M. (Eds.), Omni pede stare. Saggi architettonici e circumvesuviani in memoriam Jos de Waele. Naples, Italy: Electa Napoli and Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali.
22. McCarty, W. (2005). Humanities computing. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230504219.
23. Radder, H. (Ed.). (2003). The philosophy of scientific experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
24. Ratto, M. (2005). Embedded technical expression: Code and the leveraging of functionality. The Information Society, 21(3), 205-213. doi:10.1080/01972240490951926.
25. Ratto, M., & Scharnhorst, A. (2007). Dissimilar simulation: the epistemics of simulation in the humanities. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Report to the NWO Council for the Humanities.
26. Ridgway, F. R. S. (2000). Review: Archaic Italian roofs. The Classical Review, 50(2), 560-563.
27. Schreibman, S., & Hanlon, A. (2010). Determining value for digital humanities tools: Report on a survey of tool developers. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 4(2).
28. Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. G., & Unsworth, J. (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
29. Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1989). Archaeology into the 1990s. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 22, 1-12. doi:10.1080/00293652.1989.9965480.
30. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
31. Svensson, P. (2010). The landscape of the digital humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 4(1).
32. UVA website. (2005). Met een 3D-bril op een pre-Romeinse tempel. Press release on Dr. Lulof's research project. (in Dutch). Retrieved October 16, 2005, from http://www.uva.nl/onderzoek/object.cfm/objectid=17CA5F9A-B992-425A-B8C91D18CCF9E771/templateid=D690A6D7-378C-40EC-8351BA847892F179.
33. Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.