Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation

Climatic Change

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 397-411

  Sugiyama, Masahiro ^a   Akashi, Osamu ^b   Wada, Kenichi ^c   Kanudia, Amit ^d   Li, Jun ^e   Weyant, John ^f  

^a CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY   (Japan)

^b MUSASHINO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE EARTH   (Japan)

^d KanORS EMR   (India)

^e Centre International de Recherche sur lEnvironnement et le Developpement   (France)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; GLOBAL WARMING; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

ENERGY INTENSITY; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; REALISTIC POTENTIALS; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY; TECHNOLOGY CONSTRAINTS; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84898548197     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0874-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allcott H, Greenstone M (2012) Is there an energy efficiency gap? J Econ Perspect 26: 3-28. doi: 10. 1257/jep. 26. 1. 3.
2. Barker T et al. (2007) Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Fisher BS et al. (2007) Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. GEA (2012) Global energy assessment - toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
5. Gillingham K, Kotchen MJ, Rapson DS, Wagner G (2013) The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature 493: 475-476. doi: 10. 1038/493475a.
6. Hanaoka T, Kawase R, Kainuma M, Matsuoka Y, Ishii H, Oka K (2006) Greenhouse gas emissions scenarios database and regional mitigation analysis. NIES, Tsukuba.
7. Hanaoka T, Kainuma M, Matsuoka Y (2009) The role of energy intensity improvement in the AR4 GHG stabilization scenarios. Energy Efficiency 2: 95-108. doi: 10. 1007/s12053-009-9045-y.
8. Hanaoka T, Kainuma M, Oka K, Ishii H (2011) Greenhouse gases emissions scenarios database: contribution to the IPCC assessment reports. NIES, Tsukuba.
9. Hourcade J, Jaccard M, Bataille C, Ghersi F (eds) (2006) Hybrid modeling of energy-environment policies: Reconciling bottom-up and top-down. The Energy J, special issue.
10. Howarth RB, Sanstad AH (1995) Discount rates and energy efficiency. Contemp Econ Policy 13: 101-109. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1465-7287. 1995. tb00726. x.
11. Huntington H (2011) The policy implications of energy-efficiency cost curves. The Energy J, special issue. doi: 10. 5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-2.
12. Huntington H, Smith E (2011) Mitigating climate change through energy efficiency: an introduction and overview. The Energy J, special issue. doi: 10. 5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-SI1-1.
13. Jenkins J, Nordhaus T, Shellenberger M (2011) Energy emergence: rebound and backfire as emergent phenomena. Breakthrough Institute, Oakland.
14. Krey V, Luderer G, Clarke L (2013) Getting from here to there - energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF-27 scenarios. Climatic Change, this issue.
15. Kriegler E, Weyant J, Blanford G, Clarke L, Tavoni M, Krey V, Riahi K, Fawcett A, Richels R, Edmonds J (2013) Overview of the EMF27 study on energy system transition pathways under alternative climate policy regimes. Clim Change, this issue.
16. McCollum D, Bauer N, Calvin K, Kitous A, Riahi K (2013) Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. Clim Change, this issue.
17. McKinsey & Company (2009) Unlocking energy efficiency in the US economy.
18. Morita T, Robinson J et al (2001) Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Swart R, Pan J (eds) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Murphy R, Jaccard M (2011) Energy efficiency and the cost of GHG abatement: a comparison of bottom-up and hybrid models for the US. Energy Policy 39: 7146-7155. doi: 10. 1016/j. enpol. 2011. 08. 033.
20. Nadel S, Langer T (2012) Comments on "Is there an energy efficiency gap?" ACEEE White Paper, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington DC.
21. Rogelj J, McCollum DL, Riahi K (2013) The UN's "Sustainable Energy for All" initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2°C. Nat Clim Change 3: 545-551. doi: 10. 1038/nclimate1806.
22. Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, London.
23. Sorrell S, Schleich J, Scott S, O'Malley E, Tace F, Boede U, Ostertag K, Radgen P (2000) Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organizations. Final Report to the European Commission, Project JOS3CT970022. http://www. sussex. ac. uk/Units/spru/publications/reports/barriers/final. html.
24. Sorrell S, Mallett A, Nye S (2011) Barriers to industrial energy efficiency: a literature review. Working Paper 10/2011, Development Policy, Statistics, and Research Branch, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria.
25. Tavoni M, Tol RSJ (2010) Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy. Clim Change 100: 769-778. doi: 10. 1007/s10584-010-9867-9.
26. United Nations (2011) Sustainable energy for all. United Nations, New York. http://www. sustainableenergyforall. org/images/content/SG_Sustainable_Energy_for_All_vision_final_clean%20(1). pdf.
27. Wada K, Akimoto K, Sano F, Oda J, Homma T (2012) Energy efficiency opportunities in the residential sector and their feasibility. Energy 48: 5-10. doi: 10. 1016/j. energy. 2012. 01. 046.