Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four randomized clinical trials

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 623-631

  Epstein, D ^a   Sculpher, M J ^b   Powell, J T ^c   Thompson, S G ^e   Brown, L C ^d   Greenhalgh, R M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898547736     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9464     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ, Greenhalgh RM,. The UK endovascular aneurysm repair trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy. Health Technol Assess 2012; 16: 1-218.
2. Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, Djavani Gidlund K, Hellberg A, Wanhainen A,. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation 2011; 124: 1118-1123.
3. Earnshaw JJ,. Doubts and dilemmas over abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 607-608.
4. Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. The National Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Quality Improvement Programme (AAAQIP). Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland: London, 2012.
5. Epstein D, Sculpher MJ, Manca A, Michaels J, Thompson SG, Brown LC, et-al. Modelling the long-term cost-effectiveness of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 183-190.
6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Endovascular Stent-grafts for the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms; 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/TA167Guidance.pdf [accessed 1 February 2009].
7. Prinssen M, Buskens E, de Jong SE, Buth J, Mackaay AJ, van Sambeek MR, et-al.; DREAM trial participants. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 883-890.
8. Stroupe KT, Lederle FA, Matsumura JS, Kyriakides TC, Jonk YC,; Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Cost-effectiveness of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the OVER trial. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56: 901-909.
9. United Kingdom EVAR, Trial Investigators, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1863-1871.
10. De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Cuypers PW, et-al.; DREAM Study Group. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1881-1889.
11. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1988-1997.
12. Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, Sapoval M, Goueffic Y, Lermusiaux P,; ACE trialists. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 1167-1173.e1.
13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal; 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk [accessed 1 June 2008].
14. Chambers D, Epstein D, Walker S, Fayter D, Paton F, Wright K, et-al. Endovascular stents for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-189, 215-318, iii.
15. Michaels JA, Drury D, Thomas SM,. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 960-967.
16. Patel ST, Haser PB, Bush HL Jr, Kent KC,. The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a decision analysis model. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29: 958-972.
17. Bosch JL, Kaufman JA, Beinfeld MT, Adriaensen ME, Brewster DC, Gazelle GS,. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: cost-effectiveness of elective endovascular and open surgical repair. Radiology 2002; 225: 337-344.
18. Schermerhorn ML, O'Malley AJ, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon BE,. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 464-474.
19. Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani D, Choke N, Bown E, Sayers MJ,. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 863-872.
20. Sheskin DJ,. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (3rd edn). Chapman & Hall /CRC: Boca Raton, 2004.
21. Brown LC, Thompson SG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair trial participants. Incidence of cardiovascular events and death after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the randomized EVAR trial 1. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 935-942.
22. Office for National Statistics. Interim Life Tables 2007-2009. Office for National Statistics: London, 2010.
23. Stenbaek JF, Granath F, Swedenborg J,. Outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Difference between men and women. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 47-51.
24. Brady AR, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG, Powell JT,. Aortic aneurysm diameter and risk of cardiovascular mortality. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 1203-1207.
25. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Purchasing Power Parities for GDP and Related Indicators. OECD: Paris, 2013.
26. Brady AR, Fowkes FG, Thompson SG, Powell JT,. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 2179-2186.
27. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M, et-al.: European Society for Vascular Surgery. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41 (Suppl 1): S1-S58.
28. Department of Health. NHS Trust Reference Cost Schedules 2007-08. Department of Health: London, 2009.
29. van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FF,. Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 1994; 3: 309-319.
30. Forbes TL, DeRose G, Kribs SW, Harris KA,. Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 102-108.
31. Propper B, Abularrage CL,. Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Vasc Health Risk Manag 2013; 9: 135-141.
32. Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, et-al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123: 2848-2855.
33. Wyss TR, Brown LC, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM,. Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: data from the EVAR Trials. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 805-812.