The Perceptual Evaluation of Information Systems Using the Construct of User Satisfaction: Case Study of a Large French Group

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 27-60

  Leclercq, Aurélie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Case Study; Contextual Perspective; Evaluation of the Performance of Information Systems; Individual Perceptions; Qualitative Interpretativist Methodology; User Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898494195     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1240616.1240621     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Alpar, P., Kim, M. (1990). “Microeconomic Approaches to the Measurement of Information Technology Value,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 55–69
2. Alter, S. (1999). “A General yet Useful Theory on Information Systems,” Communication of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 13.
3. Avison, D.E. and Myers, M.D. (2002). “La Recherche Qualitative en Systèmes D’information,” Faire de la Recherche en Systèmes d’information, Editions Vuibert, Fnege.
4. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983). “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analysing Computer User Satisfaction”, Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5.
5. Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., and Powell, P.L. (1998). “The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success: The search for the dependent Variable continues,” Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 5–14.
6. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1991). “User Participation and User Involvement in Information System Development,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, Vol. 4, pp. 487–492
7. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994). “Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 59–82.
8. Baroudi, J.J. and Orlikowski, WJ. (1988). “A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 44–59.
9. Baroudi, J.J. and Orlikowski, WJ. (1991). “Studying Information Technologies in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–28.
10. Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 169–196.
11. Bonner, M. (1995). “DeLone and McLean's Model for Judging Information Systems Success-A Retrospective Application in Manufacturing,” Proceedings of the European Conference on IT Investment Evaluation, Henley Management College, UK, pp. 218–226.
12. Bostrom, R.P. and Heinen, J.S. (1977). “MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I : The Causes,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 17–32.
13. Brown, R.M., Gatian, A.W., and Hicks, J.O. (1995). “Strategic Information Systems and Financial Performance,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 215–248.
14. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (1996). “Paradox Lost ? Firm-level Evidence o the Returns to Information Systems Spending,” Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 541–558.
15. Conrath, D.W., Mignen, O.P. (1990). “What Is Being Done to Measure User Satisfaction with EDP/MIS,” Information and Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 7–19.
16. Cron, W., Sobol, M. (1983). “The Relationship between Computerization and Performance: A Strategy for Maximizing Economic Benefits of Computerization,” Information & Management, Vol. 6, pp. 171–181.
17. Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1977). L’Acteur et le Système : Les Contraintes de l’Action Collective, Paris : Edition du Seuil.
18. Cyert, R. and March, H.J. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319–340.
20. Delone, H.W. and McLean, R.E. (1992). “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60–95.
21. Delone, H.W. and McLean, R.E. (2003). “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9–30.
22. Devereux, G. (1980). De l’angoisse à la méthode dans les Sciences du Comportement, Flammarion.
23. Doll, WJ. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). “The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly, Vo. 12, No. 2, pp. 259–274.
24. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532–550.
25. Galletta, D.F. and Lederer, A.L. (1989). “Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction,” Decisions Science Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 419–439.
26. Galletta, D.F. and Heckman, R.L. (1990). “A Role Theory Perspective on End-User Development”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 168–187.
27. Gallagher, C.A. (1974). “Perceptions of the Value of Management Information Systems”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 46–55.
28. Galliers R., (1992) Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Blackwell Scientific Editions.
29. Gelderman, M. (1998). “The Relation between User Satisfaction, Usage of information Systems and Performance,” Information and Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 11–18.
30. Ginzberg, M.J. (1981). “Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 47–59.
31. Girin, J. (1981). “Quel Paradigme pour la Recherche en Gestion?”, Economies et Sociétés, Vol. 15, No. 10–12, Série Sciences de gestion, No. 2, pp. 1871–1889.
32. Girod-Seville, M. and Perret, V. (1999). “Fondements Epistémologiques de la Recherche,” dans THIETART R.A., Méthodes de Recherche en Management, Dunod.
33. Goodhue, D.L. (1995). “Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems,” Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1827–1844.
34. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). “TaskTechnology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 213–236.
35. Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N.L. (1981). “Evaluating Information System Effectiveness - Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches ; Part II: Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 79–86.
36. Ishman, M.D. (1996). “Measuring Information Success at the Individual Level in CrossCultural Environments,” Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 60–78.
37. Ives, B., Olson, M.H., and Baroudi, J.J. (1983). “The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 785–793.
38. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H. (1992). “User Involvement and MIS Success,” Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 586–603.
39. Kappelman, L.A. and McLean, E.R. (1992). “The Convergence of Organizational and End-User Computing,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 145–156.
40. Kappelman, L.A. and McLean, E.R. (1994). “User Engagement in the Development, Implementation, and Use of Information Technologies,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Maui, Hawaii, USA, pp. 512–521.
41. Kefi, H. (2002). “Évaluation des technologies et systèmes d’ information : Cas d’un entrepôt de données implanté dans une institution financière”, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Direction Professeur Kalika, Université Paris IX Dauphine.
42. Khalifa, M. and Liu, V. (2003). “Determinants of Satisfaction at Different Adoption Stages of Internet-Based Services,” Journal of The Association for Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 206–232.
43. King, R.W. and Epstein, B.J. (1983). “Assessing Information Systems Value,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 34–45.
44. King, R.W. and Rodriguez, J.I. (1978). “Evaluating Management Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 43–51.
45. Klein, H.Z. and Myers, M.D. (1999). “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 67–93.
46. Kwon, T.A. (1990). “A Diffusion of Innovation Approach to MIS Infusion : Conceptualization, Methodology and Management Strategy,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 139–146.
47. Larcker, D.F. and Lessig, V.P. (1980). “Perceived Usefulness of information: A psychometric examination,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 121–134.
48. Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1973). Adapter les Structures, Editions d’Organisation.
49. Le Moigne, J.L. (1990). “Épistémologies constructivistes et sciences de l’organisation,” dans MARTINET, A.C., Épistémologies et sciences de gestion, Paris, Économica.
50. Lucas, H.C. (1973). “A Descriptive Model of Information Systems in the Context of the Organization,” Data Base, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 27–39.
51. Lucas, H.C. (1978). “Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 27–42.
52. Mahmood, M.A., Burn J., Gemoets L.; Jacquez C., (2000). “Variables Affecting Information Technology End-User Satisfaction: A MetaAnalysis of the Empirical Literature,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 751–771.
53. Marciniak, R. (1996). “Management des Projets Informatiques: Complexité et Gestion des conflits,” Systèmes d’information et Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 27–50.
54. Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1984). “Rituals in Information System Design”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 5–15.
55. Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988). “Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research,” Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 583–598.
56. McKeen, J.D., Guimares, T., and Wetherbe, J.C. (1994). “The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 427–451.
57. McKeen, J.D. and Guimaraes, T. (1997). “Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 133–150.
58. Melone, N.P. (1990). “A Theoretical Assessment of the User Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research,” Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 76–91.
59. Miles, A.M. and Huberman, B.M. (1991). Analyse des Données Qualitatives, Recueil de Nouvelles Méthodes, De Boeck Université, Bruxelles.
60. Myers, B.L., Kappelman, L.A., and Prybutok, V.R. (1998). “A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Contingency Theory of Information Systems Assessment,” Information System Success Measurement, Idea Group Information Technology Management Series, pp. 94–121.
61. Neumann, S. and Segev, E. (1980). “Evaluate your Information System,” Systems Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 34–41.
62. Powers, R.F. and Dickson, G.W. (1973). “MIS Project Management: Myths, Opinion and Reality”, California Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 147–156.
63. Orlikowski, W. (1992). “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 398–427.
64. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Patnayakuni, N. (1997). “Technology Investment and Business Performance,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 89–97.
65. Reix, R. (2002). Systèmes d’Information et Management des Organisations, Editions Vuibert Gestion, 4ème Edition.
66. Rowe, F. (2002). Faire de la Recherche en Systèmes d’information, Vuibert, Fnege.
67. Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). “Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 261–290.
68. Saunders, C.S. and Jones, J.W. (1992). “Measuring Performance of the Information Systems Function,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 63–82.
69. Seddon, P.B. (1997). “A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 240–253.
70. Straub, D., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). “Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,” Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1328–1342.
71. ih July, Book Review, No. 36.
72. Swanson, E.B. (1974). “Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement,” Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 178–188.
73. Thietart, R.A. (1999). Méthodes de Recherche en Management, Dunod.
74. Treacy, M.E. (1985). “An Empirical Examination of a Causal Model of User Information Satisfaction,” Center of Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachussets Institute of Technology.
75. Turner, J. (1982). “Firm Size, Performance and Computer Use,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 109–120.
76. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186–204.
77. Wacheux, F. (1996). Méthodes Qualitatives et Recherches en Gestion, Editions Economica.
78. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
79. Walsham, G. (1995). “Interpretative Case Study in IS Research: Nature and Method,” European Journal of Information System, Vol. 4, pp. 74–81.
80. Weick, K.E. (1990). “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies” in Goodman P.S. et al. (Eds),” Technology and Organizations.
81. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
82. Yin, R.K. (1994). “Case Study Research: Design and Methods,” Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 181–191.
83. Zmud, R.W. and Apple, L.E. (1992). “Measuring Technology Incorporation/Infusion,” Journal of Productivity Innovation Management, Vol. 9, pp. 148–155.
84. Zviran, M. and Erlich, Z. (2003). “Measuring IS User Satisfaction: Review and Implications,” Communications of the AIS, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 81–104.