Morphometric shape analysis with measurement covariance estimates

BMVC 2011 - Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Ragheb, Hossein ^a   Thacker, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACE DATA; FLY WINGS; LINEAR MODELING; LOCAL SHAPE; MODELLING PROCESS; PROCRUSTES; SCIENTIFIC STUDIES; SHAPE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84898488890     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5244/C25.131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bookstein F. L., Tensor Biometrics for Changes in Cranial Shape, Ann. Human Biol, 11:413-437,1984.
2. Goodall C. R., The Statistical Analysis of Growth in Two Dimensions, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, 1983.
3. Kendall D. G., Shape-Manifolds, Procrustean Metrics, and Complex Projective Spaces, Bull. London Math. Sot, 16:81-121, 1984.
4. Bookstein F. L., Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions, Statis. Sci, 1:181-242, 1986.
5. Gunz P., Mitteroecker P. and Bookstein F L., Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions, in Modern Morphometrics: Physical Anthropology, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, N.Y., 73-98, 2005.
6. Bookstein F L., Landmark Methods for Forms Without Landmarks: Morphometries of Group Differences in Outline Shape, Med. Image. Anal, 1(3):225-243, 1997.
7. Rohr K., Stiehl H. S., Sprengel R., Buzug T. M., Weese J. and Kuhn M. H., Landmark-Based Elastic Registration using Approximating Thin-Plate Splines, IEEE T. Med./mag., 20(6):526-534, 2001.
8. West J. B., Fitzpatrick J. M. and Maurer C. R., Predicting Error in Rigid-Body Point-Based Registration, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 17(5):694-702, 1998.
9. Chui H. and Rangarajan A., A New Point Matching Algorithm for Non-Rigid Registration, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89(2-3): 114-141, 2003.
10. Zelditch M. L., Swiderski D. L., Sheets H. D. and Fink W. L., Geometric Morphometries for Biologists A Primer, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2004.
11. Goodall C. R., Procrustes Methds in the Statistical Analysis of Shape, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodological), 53(2):285-339, 1991.
12. Lele S. and Richtsmeier J. T., Statistical Models in Morphometric: Are They Realistic? Syst. Zool, 39(1):60-69, 1990.
13. Theobald D. L. and Wuttke D. S., Empirical Bayes Hierarchical Models for Regularizing Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Matrix Gaussian Procrustes Problem, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 103(49):18521-18527, 2006.
14. Tipping M. E. and Bishop C. M., Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 61(3):611-622, 1999.
15. Bookstein F. L., Registration Error and Functional Image Analysis, Workshop on Biomedical Statistics, Leeds, 2001.
16. Akaike Ft., A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 19(6):716-723, 1974.
17. Dempster A. P., Laird N. M. and Rubin D. B., Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm, J. R. Statist. Soc. B (Methodological), 39(1): 1-38, 1977.
18. Hand Data, http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/~aam/.
19. Face Data, www.isbe.man.ac.uk/~bim/data/talking-face/talking-face.html.
20. Fly Wing Data, http://www.flywings.org.uk.
21. Ragheb H. and Thacker N. A., Quantitative Localisation of Manually Defined Landmarks, Proc. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, London, UK, 2011.