Modes of Governance and the Limits of Policy

Higher Education Dynamics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2006, Pages 289-310

  Muller, Johan ^a   Maassen, Peter ^a   Cloete, Nico ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Education Policy; Governance Reform; High Education; High Education Policy; High Education System

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898488500     PISSN: 15710378     EISSN: 22151923     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4006-7_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. ANC (African National Congress) (1994). The Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). Johannesburg: Umanyano Publications.
2. Amaral, A. & Magelhães, A. ‘On markets, autonomy and regulation. The Janus Head revisited’. Higher Education Policy, 14, 1–14.
3. Ashby, W.R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
4. Beer, St. (1975). Platform for change. New York: John Wiley.
5. Bengu, S. (2002) Interview. www.chet.org.za/reflections/Bengu.
6. Bleecker, S.E. (1994). ‘The Virtual Organization’. The Futurist, 28, 9–13.
7. Bovens, M.,’t Hart, P. & Peters, B.G. (2002). Success and Failure in Public Governance. A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
8. Bunting, I. (2003). Memorandum. Pretoria: Department of Education.
9. Campbell, D.T. (1988). ‘The Experimenting Society’. In: C. Campbell (ed.), Methodology and Epistemology in the Social Sciences: Selected Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Centre for Education Policy Development. (1994). A Policy for Education and Training. Johannesburg.
11. Cerych, L. & Sabatier, P. (1992). Great Expectations and Mixed Performance. The Implementation of Higher Education Policies in Europe. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
12. Cloete, N & Kulati, T. (2003). ‘Managerialism within a Framework of Co-operative Governance?’ In: A. Amaral, V.L. Meek & O. Larsen (eds), The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Cloete, N., Maassen, P. & Muller, J. (Forthcoming). Great Expectations, Mixed Governance Approaches and Unintended outcomes: The post-1994 reform of South African higher education. In: Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan & A. Amaral (eds), Reform and Change in Higher Education: Policy implementation analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Cloete, N & Bunting, I. (2002). Transformation Indicators: Case Studies of the University of Port Elizabeth and Peninsula Technikon. Pretoria: CHET. Available at: www.chet.org.za/transformation.html.
15. Coombe, T. (2001). Interview. www.chet.org.za/reflections.asp.
16. CHE (Council on Higher Education) (1988/9). Annual Report of the Council on Higher Education. Pretoria: CHE.
17. CHE (Council on Higher Education) (2000). Towards a New Higher Education Landscape: Meeting the Equity, Quality and Social Development Imperatives of South Africa in the 21st Century. Pretoria. CHE.
18. Cohen, J. & Rogers, J. (1994). ‘Solidarity, Democracy, Association’. Politische Vierteiljahrschrift, Sonderheft 25, 136–159.
19. Department of Education (1997a). Education White Paper 3: A Programme for the Transformation of Higher Education, Pretoria: Government Gazette.
20. Department of Education (1997b). Higher Education Act of the Republic of South Africa, No 101 of 1997. Pretoria: Government Gazette.
21. Department of Education (2001). National Plan for Higher Education. Pretoria: Government Gazette.
22. Department of Education (2002). Transformation and Restructuring: A New Institutional Landscape for Higher Education. Pretoria: Government Gazette.
23. Department of Finance (1996). Growth, Employment and Redistribution: A Macroeconomic Strategy. Pretoria.
24. Gelb, S. (2001). Globalisation, the State and Macroeconomics. In: J. Muller, N. Cloete & S. Badat (eds), Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.
25. Gornitzka, Å. & Maassen, P. (2000). ‘Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education’. Higher Education Policy, 13, 267–285.
26. Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S. & Stensaker, B. (2002). Implementation Analysis in Higher Education. In: J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Volume XVII. New York: Agathon Press. pp381–423.
27. Gumport, P. (2001). ‘Academic Restructuring: Organisational Change and Institutional Imperatives’. Higher Education, 39, 67–91.
28. Gumport, P. & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional Adaptation: Demands for Management reform and University Administration. In: J. Stuart & W. Tierney (eds), Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XIV. New York. Agathon Press.
29. Heffen, O., Van Verhoeven, J. & De Wit, K. (1999). ‘Higher education policies and institutional response in Flanders: Instrumental analysis and cultural theory’. In: B. Jongbloed, P. Maassen & G. Neave (eds), From the Eye of the Storm. Higher Education’s Changing Institution. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp263–295.
30. Jansen, J. (2001). ‘Rethinking Education Policy Making in South Africa: Symbols of Change, Signals of Conflict’. In: A. Kraak, & M. Young (eds), Education in Retrospect: Policy and Implementation Since 1990. Pretoria & London: Human Sciences Research Council and University of London.
31. Kaufman, H. (1956). ‘Emerging doctrines of public administration’. American Political Science Review, 50, 1059–1073.
32. Kersbergen, K. & Waarden, F. (2001). Shifts in Governance: Problems of Legitimacy and Accountability. Paper on the theme ‘Shifts in Governance’ as part of the Strategic Plan 2002–2005 of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The Hague: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
33. Kraak, A. (2001). Policy Ambiguity and Slippage: Higher Education under the New State, 1994–2001. http://www.chet.org.za/papers/Kraak.
34. Lindblom, Ch.E. (1959). ‘The Science of muddling through’. Public Administration, 19, 79–99.
35. Lindblom, Ch.E. (1965). Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.
36. Maassen, P. (1996). Governmental steering and the academic culture. The intangibility of the human factor in Dutch and German universities. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
37. Maassen, P. (2000). ‘Editorial. Higher Education and the Stakeholder Society’. European Journal of Education, 35, 377–385
38. Maassen, P. & Van Vught, F. (1988). ‘An intriguing Janus-head. The two faces of the new governmental strategy for higher education in the Netherlands’. European Journal of Education, 23, 65–76.
39. Maassen, P. & Van Vught, F. (1989). Dutch higher education in transition. Culemborg: LEMMA.
40. Maassen, P. & Van Vught, F. (1994). Alternative models of governmental steering in higher education. An analysis of steering models and policy-instruments in five countries. In: L. Goedegebuure & Van Vught, F. (eds), Comparative policy studies in higher education. Utrecht: LEMMA. pp35–65.
41. Manganyi, I. (2001). Interview. www.chet.org.za/reflections.asp.
42. Mayntz, R. (1998). ‘New Challenges to Governance Theory’. Jean Monnet Chair Paper RSC No. 98/50. Florence: European University Institute.
43. Meyerson, M. & Banfield, E.C. (1955). Politics, Planning and the Public Interest. Glencoe: Free Press.
44. Moja, T., Muller, J. & Cloete, N. (1996). ‘Towards New Forms of Regulation in Higher Education: The Case of South Africa’. Higher Education, 32, 129–155.
45. Muller, J. (2000). ‘Reclaiming Knowledge: Social Theory, Curriculum and Education Policy’. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
46. Muller, J. (2001). Responsiveness and Innovation in Higher Education. http://www.chet.org.za/papers/Muller.
47. National Commission on Higher Education (1996). A Framework for Transformation. Pretoria: July.
48. Neave, G. (2002) The Stakeholder Perspective Historically Explored. In: J. Enders & O. Fulton (eds), Higher Education in a Globalising World: International Trends and Mutual Observations. A Festschrift in Honour of Ulrich Teichler. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp17–39.
49. Neave, G. & Van Vught, F. (1991). Prometheus bound, the changing relationship between
50. NEPI (National Education Policy Investigation) (1993). ‘The Framework Report and Final Report Summaries’. Cape Town: Oxford University Press/NECC.
51. New York Review of Books (2004). L1, 1, 28–31.
52. Olsen, J.P. (1988). ‘Administrative Reform and Theories of Organization’. In: C. Campbell & B.G. Peters (eds), Organizing Governance, Governing Organizations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
53. Peters, B.G. (2001). The Future of Governing. Second edition, revised. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
54. Pilot Project Consortium (2001). The Next Generation of Academics. In: F. Hayward (ed.), Implications of the New Higher Education Framework. Pretoria: CHET.
55. Pressman, J. & Wildavsky, A. (1971). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56. Reinecke, C. (2001). Interview. www.chet.org.za/reflections.asp.
57. Savoie, D.J. (1995). ‘What is Wrong with the New Public Management?’. Canadian Public Administration, 38, 112–121.
58. Scharpf, F. (1987). The limits of institutional reform. In: T. Ellwein, J. Hesse, R. Mayntz & F. Scharpf (eds), Yearbook on Government and Public Administration. Baden-Baden: Namos Verlagsgesellschaft.
59. Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
60. Steinbrunner, J.D. (1974). The cybernetic theory of decision: new dimensions of political analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61. Torres, C.A. & Schugurensky, D. (2002). ‘The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective’. Higher Education, 43, 429– 455.
62. Van Vught, F. (ed.) (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
63. Vlasceanu, L. & Sadlak, J. (2001). Changes in Higher Education Systems and Institutions of the Central and Eastern European Countries: 1994–1999. www.chet.org.za/papers/Europe.