Effect of neurofeedback and electromyographic-biofeedback therapy on improving hand function in stroke patients

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 137-151

  Rayegani, S ^a   Raeissadat, S ^b   Sedighipour, L ^a,c   Rezazadeh, I ^d   Bahrami, M ^a   Eliaspour, D ^a   Khosrawi, S ^e  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

EMG biofeedback; hand function; neurofeedback; stroke

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTOR POLLICIS BREVIS MUSCLE; ADULT; AMPLIFIER; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPH; ELECTRONIC SENSOR; FEMALE; FLEXOR MUSCLE; HAND FUNCTION; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; JEBSEN HAND FUNCTION TEST; MALE; MENTAL MOTOR IMAGERY.; MUSCLE TRAINING; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROLOGICAL THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STROKE PATIENT;

EMG BIOFEEDBACK; HAND FUNCTION; NEUROFEEDBACK; STROKE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COHORT STUDIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE SPASTICITY; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEUROFEEDBACK; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SENSATION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRIST;

EID: 84898484400     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr2102-137     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Harvey RL. Stroke syndromes. In: Braddom RL, et al, eds. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 4th ed. New York: Elsevier Saunders; 2010.
2. de Pedro-Cuesta J, Widén-Holmqvist L. Evaluation of stroke rehabilitation by randomized controlled studies: A review. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;86:433-429.
3. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:220-226.
4. Kristensen HK, Persson D, Nygren C, Boll M, Matzen P. Evaluation of evidence within occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18:11-25.
5. Teasell R, Bayona N, Salter K, Hellings C, Bitensky J. Progress in clinical neurosciences: Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Can J Neurol Sci. 2006;33:357-364.
6. Wing K. Effect of neurofeedback on motor recovery of a patient with brain injury: A case study and its implications for stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:45-53
7. Rozelle GR, Budzynski TH. Neurotherapy for stroke rehabilitation: A single case study. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995;3:211-228.
8. Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: A research overview and metaanalysis. Phys Ther. 1994;74:534-543.
9. Armagan O, Tascioglu F, Oner C. Electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of the hemiplegic hand: A placebo-controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:856-861.
10. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1393-1403.
11. Gevensleben H, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H. Neurofeedback in children with ADHD: Validation and challenges. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12:447-460.
12. Yucha C, Montgomery D. Evidence-Based Practice in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback. Wheat Ridge, CO: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback; 2009.
13. Halder S, Agorastos D, Veit R, et al. Neural mechanisms of brain-computer interface control. Neuroimage. 2011;55:1779-1790
14. Kanna S, Heng J. Quantitative EEG parameters for monitoring and biofeedback during rehabilitation after stroke. Presented at: International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics; July 14-17, 2009.
15. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KS, et al. A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use an EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42:253-8.
16. Barclay-Goddard RE, Stevenson TJ, Poluha W, Thalman L. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(5):CD005950.
17. Neuper C, Schlögl A, Pfurtscheller GJ. Enhancement of left-right sensorimotor EEG differences during feedback-regulated motor imagery. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;16:373-382.
18. Blair VA. Hand function. In: Durward BR, Baer GD, Rowe PJ, eds. Functional Human Movement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002:160-179.
19. Davis Sears E, Chung KC. Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:30-37.
20. Bovend'Eerdt TJ, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, Wade DT. Evaluation of the Modifi ed Jebsen Test of Hand Function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:195-202.
21. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. Objective and standardised test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311-319.
22. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes de Silva FH. EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110:1842-1857.
23. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-862.
24. Walker MF, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:2226-2232.
25. Lyngcoln A, Taylor N, Pizzari T, Baskus K. The relationship between adherence to hand therapy and short term outcome after distal radius fracture. J Hand Ther. 2005;18:2-8.
26. Laibow RE, Stubblebine AN, Sandground H, Bounias M. EEG-neurobiofeedback treatment of patients with brain injury: Part 2: Changes in EEG parameters versus rehabilitation. J Neurother. 2001;5:45-71.
27. Bearden TS, Cassisi JE, Pineda M. Neurofeedback training for a patient with thalamic and cortical infarctions. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003;28:241-253.
28. Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, et al. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: A preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:951-957.
29. Nelson LA. The role of biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation: Past and future directions. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:59-66.
30. Müller K, Bütefisch CM, Seitz RJ, Hömberg V. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:501-511.
31. Ayers ME. Electroencephalic Neurofeedback and Closed Head Injury of 250 Individuals. Head Injury Frontiers. National Head Injury Foundation; 1987:380-392.
32. Doĝan-Aslan M, Nakipoĝlu-Yüzer GF, Doĝan A, Karabay I, Ozgirgin N. The effect of electromyographic biofeedback treatment in improving upper extremity functioning of patients with hemiplegic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:187-192.