Biased reporting in surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 591-592

  Clavien, P A ^a   Puhan, M A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EDITORIAL; GENERAL SURGERY; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; GENERAL SURGERY; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84898483148     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9499     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et-al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess 2010; 14: iii, ix-xi, 1-193.
2. Doshi P., Neuraminidase inhibitors-the story behind the Cochrane review. BMJ 2009; 339: b5164.
3. Dickersin K, Chalmers I,. Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO. J R Soc Med 2011; 104: 532-538.
4. Hannink G, Gooszen HG, Rovers MM,. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 818-823.
5. Rosenthal R, Dwan K,. Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 1007-1015.
6. Sando IC, Malay S, Chung KC,. Analysis of publication bias in the literature for distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 927-934.e5.
7. Timmer A, Hilsden RJ, Cole J, Hailey D, Sutherland LR,. Publication bias in gastroenterological research-a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002; 2: 7.
8. Barkun JS, Aronson JK, Feldman LS, Maddern GJ, Strasberg SM; Balliol Collaboration. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1089-1096.
9. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, et-al.; Balliol Collabaoration. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet 2009; 374: 1097-1104.
10. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et-al.; Balliol Collaboration. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1105-1112.
11. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, et-al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1097-1107.