Image denoising with patch based PCA: Local versus global

BMVC 2011 - Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Deledalle, Charles Alban ^a   Salmon, Joseph ^b   Dalalyan, Arnak ^c  

^a INSTITUT TELECOM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER VISION;

DE-NOISING ALGORITHM; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; HARD THRESHOLDING; LARGE IMAGES; LEARNING TECHNIQUES; OVER-COMPLETE DICTIONARIES; PATCH-BASED DENOISING; SPECIFIC TASKS;

IMAGE DENOISING;

EID: 84898473966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5244/C25.25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. M. Aharon, M. Elad, and A. Bruckstein. K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 54(11):4311-4322, 2006.
2. S. P. Awate and R. T. Whitaker. Unsupervised, information-theoretic, adaptive image filtering for image restoration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 28(3):364-376, 2006.
3. A. Buades, B. Coll, and J-M. Morel. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model. Simul., 4(2):490-530, 2005.
4. A. Criminisi, P. Pérez, and K. Toyama. Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 13(9):1200-1212, 2004.
5. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. O. Egiazarian. Image denoising by sparse 3-D transformdomain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 16(8):2080-2095, 2007.
6. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. O. Egiazarian. BM3D image denoising with shape-adaptive principal component analysis. In Proc. Workshop on Signal Processing with Adaptive Sparse Structured Representations (SPARS'09), 2009.
7. D. L. Donoho and I. M. Johnstone. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81 (3):425-455, 1994.
8. A. A. Efros and T.K. Leung. Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In ICCV, pages 1033-1038, 1999.
9. B. Goossens, H. Q. Luong, A. Pizurica, and W. Philips. An improved non-local denoising algorithm. In LNLA, pages 143-156, 2008.
10. V. Katkovnik, A. Foi, K. O. Egiazarian, and J. T. Astola. From local kernel to nonlocal multiple-model image denoising. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 86(1):1-32, 2010.
11. Ch. Kervrann and J. Boulanger. Optimal spatial adaptation for patch-based image denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15(10):2866-2878, 2006.
12. J. Mairal, G. Sapiro, and M. Elad. Learning multiscale sparse representations for image and video restoration. Multiscale Model. Simul., 7(1):214-241, 2008.
13. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. In ICCV, pages 2272-2279, 2009.
14. D. D. Muresan and T. W. Parks. Adaptive principal components and image denoising. In ICIP, pages 101-104, 2003.
15. J. Salmon and Y. Strozecki. From patches to pixels in non-local methods: Weighted-Average reprojection. In ICIP, pages 1929-1932, 2010.
16. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 13(4):600-612, 2004.
17. L. Zhang, W. Dong, D. Zhang, and G. Shi. Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping. Pattern Recogn., 43(4):1531-1549, 2010.