Generic object recognition via shock patch fragments

BMVC 2007 - Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Özcanli, Özge C ^a   Kimia, Benjamin B ^a  

^a Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION;

GENERIC OBJECT RECOGNITION; MINIMAL TRAINING; NATURAL IMAGES; OBJECT FRAGMENTS; RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; SHOCK GRAPHS; STATE OF THE ART;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 84898449299     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5244/C.21.104     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. S. Agarwal, A. Awan, and D. Roth. Learning to detect objects in images via a sparse, part-based representation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 20(11):1475-1490, 2004.
2. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 24(4):509-522, 2002.
3. D. Crandall, P. Felzenszwalb, and D. Huttenlocher. Spatial priors for part-based recognition using statistical models. In CVPR, San Diego, CA, 2005.
4. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. One-shot learning of object categories. PAMI, 28(4):594-611, 2006.
5. L. Fei-Fei and P. Perona. A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In CVPR, pages 524-531, 2005.
6. R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In CVPR, Madison, WI, 2003.
7. R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A visual category filter for google images. In ECCV, 2004.
8. P. J. Giblin and B. B. Kimia. On the local form and transitions of symmetry sets, medial axes, and shocks. IJCV, 54(Issue 1-3):143-157, August 2003.
9. F. Jurie and C. Schmid. Scale-invariant shape features for recognition of object categories. In CVPR, 2004.
10. M. F. Kelly and M. D. Levine. Annular symmetry operators: A method for locating and describing objects. In ICCV, 1995.
11. B. B. Kimia, A. R. Tannenbaum, and S. W. Zucker. Shapes, shocks, and deformations, I: The components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space. IJCV, 15(3):189-224, 1995.
12. M. P. Kumar, P. H. S. Torr, and A. Zisserman. Extending pictorial structures for object recognition. In BMVC, pages 789-798, 2004.
13. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, 2004.
14. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27(10):1615-1630, 2005.
15. K. Mikolajczyk, T. Tuytelaars, C. Schmid, A. Zisserman, J. Matas, F. Schaffalitzky, T. Kadir, and L. J. V. Gool. A comparison of affine region detectors. IJCV, 65(1-2):43-72, 2005.
16. R. C. Nelson and A. Selinger. A cubist approach to object recognition. In ICCV, pages 614-621, 1998.
17. A. Opelt, A. Pinz, and A. Zisserman. A boundary-fragment-model for object detection. In ECCV, 2006.
18. A. Opelt, A. Pinz, and A. Zisserman. Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet. In CVPR, 2006.
19. O. C. Ozcanli, A. Tamrakar, B. B. Kimia, and J. L. Mundy. Augmenting shape with appearance in vehicle category recognition. In CVPR, 2006.
20. M. A. Ruzon and C. Tomasi. Edge, junction, and corner detection using color distributions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 23(11):1281-1295, 2001.
21. F. Schaffalitzky and A. Zisserman. Multi-view matching for unordered image sets, or "how do i organize my holiday snaps?". In ECCV, volume 1, pages 414-431, 2002.
22. C. Schmid and R. Mohr. Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE PAMI, 19(5):530-535, 1997.
23. T. Sebastian, P. Klein, and B. Kimia. Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. PAMI, 26:551-571, May 2004.
24. A. Selinger and R. C. Nelson. A perceptual grouping hierarchy for appearance-based 3d object recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 76(1):83-92, 1999.
25. J. Shotton, A. Blake, and R. Cipolla. Contour-based learning for object detection. In ICCV, 2005.
26. K. Siddiqi and B. B. Kimia. A shock grammar for recognition. In Proc. CVPR, pages 507-513, 1996.
27. K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. J. Shokoufandeh, and S. W. Zucker. Shock graphs and shape matching. In ICCV, pages 222-229, 1998.
28. J. Sivic, B. C. Russell, A. A. Efros, A. Zisserman, and W. T. Freeman. Discovering objects and their localization in images. In ICCV, pages 370-377, 2005.
29. E. B. Sudderth, A. B. Torralba,W. T. Freeman, and A. S.Willsky. Learning hierarchical models of scenes, objects, and parts. In ICCV, pages 1331-1338, 2005.
30. A. Tamrakar and B. B. Kimia. Medial visual fragments as an intermediate image representation for segmentation and perceptual grouping. In Proc. of POCV, page 47, 2004.
31. A. Tamrakar and B. B. Kimia. No grouping left behind: From edges to curve fragments. In sub. to ICCV, 2007.
32. H. Tek and B. B. Kimia. Symmetry maps of free-form curve segments via wave propagation. In ICCV, 1999.
33. D. Tell and S. Carlsson. Combining appearance and topology for wide baseline matching. In ECCV, 2002.
34. M. Vidal-Naquet and S. Ullman. Object recognition with informative features and linear classification. In ICCV, pages 281-288, Nice, France, 2003.
35. G. Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Fei-Fei. Using dependent regions for object categorization in a generative framework. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 1597-1604, 2006.