Erratum: Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring decreases EEG burst suppression ratio during deep general Anesthesia (Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (2014) 31 (133-137) DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000034);Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring decreases EEG burst suppression ratio during deep general anesthesia

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 133-137

  Cǎlin, Alexandru ^a,b   Kumaraswamy, Vishakhadatta M ^b,c   Braver, Diana ^b   Nair, Dinesh G ^b   Moldovan, Mihai ^a,d   Simon, Mirela V ^a,b  

^a CAROL DAVILA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; EEG burst suppression; SSEP monitoring

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; KETAMINE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BURST SUPPRESSION RATIO; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPH ELECTRODE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MONITOR; MONITORING; NERVE STIMULATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PATIENT MONITORING; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD; ULNAR NERVE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; REACTION TIME; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898433034     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: 15371603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000450     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Akrawi WP, Drummond JC, Kalkman CJ, Patel PM. A comparison of the electrophysiologic characteristics of EEG burst-suppression as produced by isoflurane, thiopental, etomidate, and propofol. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1996;8:40-46.
2. Allison T, Goff WR, Abrahamian HA, Rosner BS. The effects of barbiturate anesthesia upon human somatosensory evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1963;(suppl 24):68-75.
3. American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1984;1:3-53.
4. Amzica F. Basic physiology of burst-suppression. Epilepsia 2009;50(suppl 12):38-39.
5. Amzica F, Kroeger D. Cellular mechanisms underlying EEG waveforms during coma. Epilepsia 2011;52(suppl 8):25-27.
6. Beydoun A, Yen CE, Drury I. Variance of interburst intervals in burst suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;79:435-439.
7. Boisseau N, Madany M, Staccini P, et al. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:785-789.
8. Bruhn J, Bouillon TW, Shafer SL. Bispectral index (BIS) and burst suppression: revealing a part of the BIS algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput 2000;16:593-596.
9. Chiappa KH, Ropper AH. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (second of two parts). N Engl J Med 1982;306:1205-1211.
10. Ching S, Purdon PL, Vijayan S, et al. A neurophysiological-metabolic model for burst suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:3095-3100.
11. Clark DL, Rosner BS. Neurophysiologic effects of general anesthetics. I. The electroencephalogram and sensory evoked responses in man. Anesthesiology 1973;38:564-582.
12. Concas A, Santoro G, Mascia MP, et al. The general anesthetic propofol enhances the function of gamma-aminobutyric acid-coupled chloride channel in the rat cerebral cortex. J Neurochem 1990;55:2135-2138.
13. Conradsen I, Moldovan M, Jennum P, et al Dynamics of muscle activation during tonic-clonic seizures. Epilepsy Res 2013;104:84-93.
14. Constantinescu AO, Ilie A, Ciocan D, et al. Endogenous adenosine A1 receptor activation underlies the transient post-ischemic rhythmic delta EEG activity. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:1117-1126.
15. Dawson GD. A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1954;6:65-84.
16. Ferron JF, Kroeger D, Chever O, Amzica F. Cortical inhibition during burst suppression induced with isoflurane anesthesia. J Neurosci 2009;29:9850-9860.
17. Hartikainen K, Rorarius M, Makela K, et al. Visually evoked bursts during isoflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1995a;74:681-685.
18. Hartikainen KM, Rorarius M, Perakyla JJ, et al. Cortical reactivity during isoflurane burst-suppression anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995b;81:1223-1228.
19. Henry CE, Scoville WB. Supression-burst activity from isolated cortex in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1952;4:1-22.
20. Hughes Jr. Extreme stereotypy in the burst suppression pattern. Clin Electroencephalogr 1986;17:162-168.
21. Huotari AM, Koskinen M, Suominen K, et al. Evoked EEG patterns during burst suppression with propofol. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:18-24.
22. Ilie A, Ciocan D, Constantinescu AO, et al. Endogenous activation of adenosine A1 receptors promotes post-ischemic electrocortical burst suppression. Neuroscience 2009;159:1070-1078.
23. Jantti V, Sonkajarvi E, Mustola S, et al. Single-sweep cortical somatosensory evoked potentials: N20 and evoked bursts in sevoflurane anaesthesia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:320-324.
24. Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, et al. Comparability of Narcotrend index and bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:235-240.
25. Kristiansen K, Courtois G. Rhythmic electrical activity from isolated cerebral cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1949;1:265-272.
26. Kroeger D, Amzica F. Hypersensitivity of the anesthesia-induced comatose brain. J Neurosci 2007;27:10597-10607.
27. Liu EH, Wong HK, Chia CP, et al. Effects of isoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during comparable depth of anaesthesia as guided by bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:193-197.
28. Lukatch HS, Kiddoo CE, MacIver MB. Anesthetic-induced burst suppression EEG activity requires glutamate-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:1322-1331.
29. Nuwer MR, Emerson RG, Galloway G, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 2012;29:101-108.
30. Rampil IJ, Laster MJ. No correlation between quantitative electroencephalographic measurements and movement response to noxious stimuli during isoflurane anesthesia in rats. Anesthesiology 1992;77:920-925.
31. Rampil IJ, Weiskopf RB, Brown JG, et al. I653 and isoflurane produce similar dose-related changes in the electroencephalogram of pigs. Anesthesiology 1988;69:298-302.
32. Rytky S, Huotari AM, Alahuhta S, et al. Tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials during EEG suppression in sevoflurane anaesthesia. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:1655-1658.
33. Simon MV, Michaelides C, Wang S, et al. The effects of EEG suppression and anesthetics on stimulus thresholds in functional cortical motor mapping. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:784-792.
34. Steriade M, Amzica F, Contreras D. Cortical and thalamic cellular correlates of electroencephalographic burst-suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:1-16.
35. Swank RL, Watson CW. Effects of barbiturates and ether on spontaneous electrical activity of dog brain. J Neurophysiol 1949;12:137-160.
36. Timofeev I, Grenier F, Bazhenov M, et al. Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cereb Cortex 2000;10:1185-1199.
37. Yli-Hankala A, Jantti V, Pyykko I, Lindgren L. Vibration stimulus induced EEG bursts in isoflurane anaesthesia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;87:215-220.