Relationship between event-related desynchronization and cortical excitability in healthy subjects and stroke patients

Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 123-128

  Aono, Koji ^a   Miyashita, Shotaro ^b   Fujiwara, Yosuke ^b   Kodama, Mitsuhiko ^a   Hanayama, Kozo ^a   Masakado, Yoshihisa ^a   Ushiba, Junichi ^b  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Corticospinal excitability; Event related desynchronization; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; IMAGERY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NEUROMONITORING; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ADULT; AGED; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898418907     PISSN: 03850005     EISSN: 21852243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1629-37.
2. Izumi S, Kondo T, Shindo K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation synchronized with maximal movement effort of the hemiplegic hand after stroke: a double-blinded controlled pilot study. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 49-54.
3. Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 2006; 29: 536-46.
4. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 674-79.
5. Takahashi M, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Osu R, Hanakawa T, Gouko M, et al. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 56.
6. Matsumoto J, Fujiwara T, Takahashi O, Liu M, Kimura A, Ushiba J. Modulation of mu rhythm desynchronization during motor imagery by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 7: 27.
7. Brignani D, Manganotti P, Rossini PM, Miniussi C. Modulation of cortical oscillatory activity during transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 603-12.
8. Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 10: 1-16.
9. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97-113.
10. Pfurtscheller G. Functional brain imaging based on ERD/ERS. Vision Res 2001; 41: 1257-60.
11. Formaggio E, Storti SF, Avesani M, Cerini R, Milanese F, Gasparini A, et al. EEG and fMRI coregistration to investigate the cortical oscillatory activities during finger movement. Brain Topogr 2008; 21: 100-11.
12. Moosmann M, Ritter P, Krastel I, Brink A, Thees S, Blankenburg F, et al. Correlates of alpha rhythm in functional magnetic resonance imaging and near infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 145-58.
13. Lepage JF, Saint-Amour D, Theoret H. EEG and neuronavigated single-pulse TMS in the study of the observation/execution matching system: are both techniques measuring the same process? J Neurosci Methods 2008; 175: 17-24.
14. Maki H, Ilmoniemi RJ. EEG oscillations and magnetically evoked motor potentials reflect motor system excitability in overlapping neuronal populations. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 492-501.
15. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 284-88.
16. Mitchell WK, Baker MR, Baker SN. Muscle responses to transcranial stimulation in man depend on background oscillatory activity. J Physiol 2007; 583: 567-79.
17. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KS, Ang BT, Kuah CW, Wang C, et al. A clinical evaluation of non-invasive motor imagery-based brain-computer interface in stroke. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008: 4178-81.
18. de Vries S, Tepper M, Otten B, Mulder T. Recovery of motor imagery ability in stroke patients. Rehabil Res Pract 2011; 2011: 283840.
19. Meng F, Tong K, Chen S, Wong W, Lui K, Tang K, et al. BCI-FES Training System Design and Implementation for Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. Proceedings of the IJCNN 2008; 4102-05.
20. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Combination of Brain-Computer Interface Training and Goal-Directed Physical Therapy in Chronic Stroke: A Case Report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair September 2010; 24: 674-79.