Patient results and laboratory test accuracy

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 65-70

  Katayev, Alexander ^a   Fleming, James K ^a  

^a LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical performance; Bias; Laboratory tests; Quality control; Reference interval; United States of America

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

BLOOD; BLOOD ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; LABORATORY; METHODOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CALCIUM; CLINICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84898414949     PISSN: 09526862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2012-0092     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Fraser, C.G. (2001), Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice, American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, DC.
2. Katayev, A., Balciza, C., Seccombe, D.W. (2010), "Establishing reference intervals for clinical laboratory test results: is there a better way" in American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 133, pp. 180-186.
3. Klee, G.G. (2010), "Establishment of outcome-related analytic performance goals" in Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 56, No. 7, pp. 14-22.
4. Miller, W.G., Erek, A., Cunningham, T.D., Oladipo, O., Scott, M.G., Johnson, R.E. (2011), "Commutability limitations influence quality control results with different reagent lots" in Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 76-83.