The interplay of teaching conceptions and course management system design: Research implications and creative innovations for future designs

Course Management Systems for Learning: Beyond Accidental Pedagogy

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 57-68

  Apedoe, Xornam S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898362675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-512-2.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Boettcher, J.V. (2003). Course management systems and learning principles: Getting to know each other. Syllabus, July. Retrieved Jul. 10, 2004, from http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7888
2. Brown, G. (2000). Where do we go from here? The Technology Source. January/February. Retrieved June 19, 2004, from http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/default.asp?show=article&id=667
3. Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning environments. Educause Review, 37(6), 27-34.
4. Carmean, C. & Haefner, J. (2003). Next-generation course management systems. Educause Quarterly, 26(1), 10-13. Available online: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0311.pdf
5. Cohn, E. R. & Stoehr, G.P. (2003). Multidisciplinary applications of CourseInfo course management software to motivate students in traditional course settings. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of ComputerEnhanced Learning, 2(1). Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/1/index.asp
6. Ehrman, S.C. & Gilbert, S.W. (2003). Better off with or without your CMS? 5 kinds of assessment that can really help. Syllabus. Retrieved July 10, 2004, from http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7889
7. Hafner, K. & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8. Hannafin, M.J., & Land, S.M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
9. Howard, B.C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 455-465.
10. Katz, R.N. (2003). Balancing technology and tradition: The example of course management systems. Educause Review, 38(4), 48-59.
11. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255-275.
12. Kember, D. & Kwan, K. (2002). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear, (Eds.). Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 219-239). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Kuriloff, P.C. (2001). One size will not fit all. The Technology Source, July/August. Retrieved June 19, 2004, from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=899
14. McCray, G. (2000). An introduction to special section. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2(1). Retrieved July10, 2004, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/1/intro01/index.asp
15. Morgan, G. (2003). Faculty use of course management systems. Boulder, CO: ECAR Research Publication.
16. Oliver, K. (2001). Recommendations for student tools in online course management systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13, 47-70.
17. Pittinsky, M.S., (Ed.). (2003). The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the Internet on higher education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Pratt, D.D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 203-220.
19. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J.D. (2001). Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299-325.
20. Twigg, C.A. (1994). The need for a national learning infrastructure. Educom Review, 29(4, 5, 6). Retrieved June 19, 2004, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/nli0001.html