Designing complex web information systems: Integrating evolutionary process engineering

Designing Complex Web Information Systems: Integrating Evolutionary Process Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-364

  Paiano, Roberto ^a   Guido, Anna Lisa ^a   Pandurino, Andrea ^a   Paolini, Paolo ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898338651     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-300-5     Document Type: Book

References (95)

1. Ambler, S. (2002). Agile modeling: Effective practices for extreme programming and the unified process. John Wiley & Son, Ltd.
2. Cardoso, J. (2007). The semantic Web Vision: Where are We?. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22-26.
3. Galbraith, J.R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
4. Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.
5. Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (1995). The reengineering revolution. New York, NY: Harper Business.
6. IEEE Std 1320.1-1998. (1998). IEEE Standard for Functional Modeling Language-Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0. New York: IEEE.
7. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
8. Paiano, R., Pandurino, A., & Guido A. (2006). Conceptual design of Web application families: The BWW approach. Proceedings from the 6th ACM OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, (pp. 23-32). Portland, OR.
9. Paiano, R., Sánchez-Ruíz, A., Motoshi S., & Langlois, N. (2007). Domain-specific software development terminology: Do we all speak the same language. Proceedings from the 7th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM'07). Montreal, Canada.
10. Pighin, M., & Marzona, A. (2005). Sistemi informativi aziendali. Pearson Education.
11. Porter, M.E., & Millar V.E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-161.
12. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson I., & Booch, G. (2004). Unified modeling language reference manual. Addison-Wesley.
13. Van der Aalst W.M.P., der Hofstede, A.H.M., & Weske, M. (2003). Business process management: A survey. Proceedings from the First International Conference in Business Process Management, (pp. 1-12) Eindhoven, PAYS-BAS.
14. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference.
15. Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.
16. Cleland, D.I., & King W.E. (1983). Systems analysis and project management. McGraw-Hill.
17. Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183 (1993) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0).
18. Eriksson, H. E., & Penker M. (2000). Business modeling with UML: Patterns at work. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson I., & Booch, G. (2004). Unified modeling language reference manual. Addison-Wesley.
20. Sparks, G. (2000). An introduction to UML: The business process model. Retrieved January 2007, from http://www.uml.co.il/WhitePapers/The_Business_Process_Model.pdf
21. Baresi, L., Garzotto, F., Mainetti, L., & Paolini, P. (2002). Meta-modeling techniques meet Web application design tools. Proceedings from 5th International Conference FASE 2002 (part of ETAPS 2002) (pp. 294-307).
22. Beck, K., & Cunningham, W. (1989). A laboratory for teaching object-oriented thinking. Proceedings from OOPSLA 198 (pp. 7-10).
23. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P. (2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design technique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
24. Brambilla, M. (2003). Extending hypertext conceptual models with process oriented primitives WebML. Proceedings from ER 2003 (pp. 246-262). Chicago, IL.
25. Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., & Bongio, A. (2000). Web modeling language (WebML): A modeling language for designing Web sites. Proceeding from the 9th World Wide Web Conference (WWW9) (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam.
26. Conallen, J. (2002). Building Web applications with UML (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
27. Koch, N., & Kraus, A. (2002). The expressiveness power of UML-based Web engineering. Second Int. Workshop on Web-Oriented SoftwareTechnology (IWWOST'02). CYTED (pp. 105-119). Malaga, Spain.
28. Koch, N., Kraus, A., Cachero, C. & Meliá S. (2004). Integration of business processes in Web applications models. Journal of Web Engineering, 3, 22-49. Rinton Press.
29. Kraus, A., & Koch, N. (2003). A meta-model for UWE. (Tech. Rep. 0301). Institut für Informatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
30. Paolini, P., Mainetti L., & Bolchini, D. (2006) Progettare siti Web e applicazioni mobili. McGraw-Hill Companies.
31. Perrone, V., Bolchini, D., & Paolini P. (2005). A stakeholders-centered approach for conceptual modeling of communication-intensive applications. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on design of communication: Documenting & designing for pervasive information (pp. 25-33).
32. Rossi, G., Schmid, H., & Lyardet, F. (2003). Engineering business processes in Web applications: Modeling and navigation issues. Third Int. Workshop on Web- Oriented Software Technology (pp. 1677-1682). Oviedo.
33. Rumbaugh, J., Booch, G., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The unified software development process. Prentice Hall.
34. Schwabe, D., & Rossi, G. (1998). Developing hypermedia applications using OOHDM. Workshop on Hypermedia Development Processes, Methods and Models, Hypertext, (pp. 18-34). Pittsburgh, USA.
35. Baresi, L., Garzotto, F., Mainetti, L., & Paolini, P., (2002). Meta-modeling techniques meet Web application design tools. Proceedings from the 5th International Conference FASE 2002 (part of ETAPS 2002), (pp. 294-307).
36. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P.(2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design technique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
37. Paolini, P., Mainetti L., & Bolchini, D. (2006). Progettare siti Web e applicazioni mobili. McGraw-Hill Companies.
38. Perrone, V., Bolchini, D., & Paolini P. (2005). A stakeholders centered approach for conceptual modeling of communication-intensive applications. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: Documenting & Designing for Pervasive Information, (pp. 25-33).
39. Cardoso, J. (2007). The semantic Web vision: Where are we?. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(5), 84-88.
40. Corcho, O.R., Mariano, F., Gómez-Pérez, A., & López-Cima, A. (2005). Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE. In: R. Benjamins, P. Casanovas, J. Breuker, & A. Gangemi, Law and the Semantic Web, (pp. 142-157). Springer-Verlag.
41. Grüninger, M., & Fox, M.S. (1995). Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. Proceedings From IJCAI'95, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. Montreal Canada.
42. Mariano F. L., Gómez-Pérez, A. & Juristo, N. (1997). Methontology: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. Proceedings of the Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI, (pp. 33-40). Stanford Universusty, CA.
43. Noy, D., & McGuinness, D. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. (Tech. Rep. KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics
44. Technical Report SMI-2001-0880) Stanford University: Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory.
45. OMG. (1997). Object constraint language specification, (version 1.1). Recommendation.
46. Uschold, M., & King, M. (1995). Towards a methodology for building ontologies. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95. Montreal, Canada.
47. W3C. (2004). RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema.
48. W3C. (2004). RDF/XML syntax specification W3C recommendation.
49. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P.(2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design techinique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
50. Booch, G., Jacobson, I., & Rumbaugh, J. (1998). The unified modeling language user guide. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Readings.
51. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., & Fickas, S. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition, In Science of Computer Programming, 20, 3-50. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland Inc.
52. De la Vara, J. L. (2006). Requirements models derivation from organizational models. MC Thesis. Valencia: University of Technology.
53. González, J., & Sánchez Díaz, J. (2007). Business process-driven requirements engineering: A goal-based approach. Proceedings of 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support in conjunction with Caise 07.
54. Jackson, M. (1995). The world and the machine. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, (pp. 283-292). New York, NY: ACM Press.
55. Kavakli, E., & Loucopoulos, P. (2004). Goal modeling in requirements engineering: Analysis and critique of current methods. Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies, 102-124. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
56. Regev, G., & Wegmann, A. (2004). Defining early IT system requirements with regulation principles: The light switch approach. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International, 6(11), 144- 153. IEEE Computer Society Press.
57. UWA Consortium. (2001). General definition of the UWA framework. (Tech. rep. EC IST) UWA project (IST-2000-25131).
58. van Lamsweerde, A. (2000). Requirements engineering in the year 00: A research perspective. Proceedings of ICSE'2000 - 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, (pp. 5-19). New York: ACM Press.
59. Yu, E. (1995). Modeling strategic relationships for process reengineering. Doctoral thesis. Toronto, University of Toronto.
60. Yue, K. (1997). What does it mean to say that a specification is complete?. Proceedings of IWSSD-4 - the Fourth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design. Monterey, USA. IEEE Computer Society Press.
61. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P.(2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design technique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
62. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
63. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P.(2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design techinique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
64. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
65. Diaz, O., & Paz, I. (2005) Turning Web applications into Portlets: Raising the issues. Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT'05), (pp. 31-37). Trento, Italy.
66. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
67. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
68. Atzeni, P., Masci, A., Mecca, G., Merialdo, P., & Sindoni, G. (1998). The araneus Web-based management system. ACM SIGMOD Record, 2 (2), 544-546.
69. Bochicchio, M., & Paiano, R. (2000). Prototyping Web applications. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM symposium on Applied computing, (pp 978-983).Como, Italy.
70. Booch, G., Jacobson, I., & Rumbaugh, J. (1998). The unified modeling language user guide. Boston: MA: Addison-Wesley Readings.
71. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and technique of adaptive hypermedia. User modeling and user adaptive interaction, 6(2-3), 87-129.
72. Conallen, J. (1999). Modeling Web application architectures with UML. Communication of the ACM, 42(10), 63-70.
73. McConnell, S. (1998). Software project survival guide. Microsoft Press.
74. Mendelzon, A., Mecca, G., Merialdo, M. (1999). Efficient queries over Web views. Araneus Project Working Report.
75. Oreizy, P., Gorlick, M.M., Taylor, R.N., Heimbigner, D., Johnson, G., Medvidovic, et al. (1999). An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intelligent System, 14(3), 54-62.
76. Szekely, P. (1994). User interface prototyping: Tool and techniques. Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Engineering and Human Computer Interaction.
77. W3C. (2004). RDF/XML Syntax Specification W3C Recommendation.
78. Zhang, J., & Chung, J (2003). Mockup-driven fast-prototyping methodology for Web application development. Software: Practice and Experience, 33(13), 1251-1272.
79. Booch, G., Jacobson, I., & Rumbaugh, J. (1998). The unified modeling language user guide. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Readings.
80. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference.
81. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.
82. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference.
83. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P.(2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design technique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
84. Engelberg, D., & Seffah A. (2002). A framework for rapid mid-fidelity prototyping of Web sites. Proceeding of the IFIP 17th World Computer Congress-TC13 Stream on Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge, (pp. 203-215).
85. Isensee, S., & Rudd, J. (1996). The art of rapid prototyping. International Thomson Computer Press.
86. Jung, R., & Winter, R. (1998). Case for Web sites. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (pp. 726-731). Atlanta, GA.
87. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (2004). Unified modeling language reference manual. Addison-Wesley
88. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference.
89. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P. (2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design techinique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
90. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., & Fickas, S. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20, 3-50. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland Inc.
91. UWA Consortium. (2001). General definition of the UWA framework. (Tech. rep. EC IST) UWA project (IST-2000-25131).
92. W3C. (2004). OWL Web ontology language reference.
93. Bolchini, D., & Paolini, P. (2006). Interactive dialogue model: A design techinique for multichannel applications. IEEE Transaction on multimedia, 8(3), 529-541.
94. Lui, K.M., & Chan, K.C.C. (2008). Software development rhythms: Harmonizing agile practices for synergy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
95. OMG. (2006). Business process modeling notation specification.