E-government and opportunities for participation: The case of the mexican state web portals

Politics, Democracy and E-Government: Participation and Service Delivery

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 56-74

  Gil Garcia, J Ramon ^a,c   Miranda, Fernando González ^b  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898300672     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-933-0.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Aguilar, L. F. (2003). La hechura de las políticas. México: Porrúa.
2. Aguilar, L. F. (2003). Problemas públicos y agenda de gobierno. México: Porrúa.
3. Alvarez, R., & Hall, T. (2004). Point, Clic, and Vote: The future of Internet voting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Amoretti, F. (2007). International Organizations ICTs Policies: E-Democracy and EGovernment for Political Development. Review of Policy Research, 24(4). doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00286.x
5. Arendt, H. (2003). La condición humana. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
6. Bajjaly, S. T. (1999). Managing Emerging Information Systems in the Public Sector. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1).
7. Berntzen, L., & Winsvold, M. (2005). Webbased tools for policy evaluation en M. Böhlen, J. Gamper, W. Polasek & M. A. Wimmer (Eds.) E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy. Italia: International Conference, TCGOV2005.
8. Birch, S., & Watt, B. (2004). Remote Electronic Voting: Free, Fair and Secret? The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. London: Sage Publications.
9. Bolgherini, S. (2007). The Technology Trap and the Role of Political and Cultural Variables: A Critical Analysis of the E-Government Policies. Review of Policy Research. 24(3). The Policy Studies Organization.
10. Bonney, N. (2004). Local democracy renewed? The Political Quarterly Publishing., 75(1), 43-51.
11. Booth, W., Colomb, G., & Williams, J. (2003). The craft of research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Bretschneider, S. (2003). Information Technology, E-Government, and Institutional Change. Public Administration Review, 63(6). doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00337
13. Brown, M. M. (2001). The Benefits and Costs of Information Technology Innovations: An Empirical Assessment of a Local Government Agency. Public Performance & Management Review, 24, No. (4). Sage Publications.
14. Browning, G. (1996). Electronic Democracy: using the Internet to influence American Politics. Wilton, CT: Pemberton Press.
15. Calderón, E., & Cazés, D. (1994). Tecnología ciudadana para la democracia. México: UNAM.
16. Chappelet, J., & Kilchenmann, P. (2005). Interactive Tools for e-Democracy: Examples from Switzerland en Böhlen, M., Gamper, J., Polasek, W., & Wimmer, M. A. (Eds.) E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy. Italia: International Conference, TCGOV2005.
17. Chutimaskul, W., & Funilkul, S. (2004). The Framework of e-Democracy Development en Traunmüller, Roland, Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
18. Cooper, P. J. (1998). Public Administration for the twenty-first century. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
19. Cunill, N. (2004). Balance de la participación ciudadana en las políticas sociales. Propuesta de un marco analítico en Ziccardi, A. (Coord.) Participación ciudadana y políticas sociales en el ámbito local. México: UNAM-IIS.
20. E-Participate. (2006). The eParticipation Trans-European Network for Democratic Renewal & Citizen Engagement. Retrieved March 23, 2008, from www.eparticipate.eu
21. Eifert, M., & Püschel, J. O. (2004). National Electronic Government: Comparing governance structures in multi-layer administrations. London: Routledge.
22. Fernandez, R., Fernández-Collado, F., & Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
23. Ferro, E., Helbig, N., & Gil-García, J. R. (2006). The Digital Divide Metaphor: Understanding Paths to IT Literacy. NCDG Working Paper No. 07-001. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
24. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview: from neutral stance to political involvement en Denzin, Norman y Lincoln, Yvonna S. (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Fountain, J. (2006). Challenges to Organizational Change: Multi-Level Integrated Information Structures (MIIS). NCDG Working Paper No. 06-001 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Gil-García, J. R. (2005). Enacting State Websites: A Mixed Method Study Exploring E-Government Success in Multi-Organizational Settings. Nelson A. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy. University at Albany.
27. Gil-García, J. R. & Martínez-Moyano. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The evolution of systems of rues on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 266-290. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005
28. Gil-García, J. R., & Helbig, N. (2007). Exploring E-Government Benefits and Success Factors. Encyclopedia of Digital Government (Vol. 2). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
29. Gil-García, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2006). Encyclopedia of E-Commerce, E-Government, and Mobile Commerce. Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Reference.
30. Gil-García, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2007). Modelo Multi-Dimensional de Medición del Gobierno Electrónico para América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL-Colección Documentos de Proyectos. Publicación de las Naciones Unidas.
31. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187-216. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
32. Grönlund, A. (2004). State of the art in e-Gov research: A survey, en Traunmüller, R. (Ed.) Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
33. Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing government in the information age: international practice in IT-enabled public sector reform. London: Routledge.
34. Holden, S., Norris, D. & Fletcher, P. (2003). Electronic Government at the Local Level: progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review. 26(4).
35. Huang, W., Siau, K., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Electronic government strategies and implementation. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
36. Kröll, H. (2000). El método de los estudios de caso, en Tarrés, Ma. Luisa (ed.) Escuchar, observar y comprender: sobre la investigación cualitativa en la investigación social. México: Porrúa: COLMEX/FLACSO.
37. Macintosh, A., McKay-Hubbard, A., & Shell, D. (2005b). Using Weblogs to Support Local Democracy, en Böhlen, Gamper, Polasek & Wimmer (Eds.) E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy. Italia: International Conference, TCGOV2005.
38. Macintosh, A., Whyte, A., & Renton, A. (2005a). From the Top Down: An evaluation of e-Democracy Activities Initiated by Councils and Government. Local e-Democracy National Project. Bristol, UK: Bristol City Council.
39. Mahrer, H., & Krimmer, R. (2005). Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: identifying the notion of the 'middle man paradox'. Information Systems Journal, 15, 27-42. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00184.x
40. Margain, J. (2001). e-México: la estrategia del gobierno. Política Digital, 1, 48-51.
41. Márquez, M. (2006). Una gran oportunidad para la democracia. Política Digital., 27, 56-57.
42. Masters, Z., Macintosh, A., & Smith, E. (2004). Young People and e-Democracy: Creating a culture of participation, en Traunmüller, R. Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
43. Meijer, A. (2006). ICTs and Political Accountability: An assessment of the impact digitization in government on political accountability in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New York State. National Center for Digital Government Working Paper No. 06-002. USA.
44. Morgan, D. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. New York: Sage Publications.
45. Moynihan, D. (2004). Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security and Systems Theory. Public Administration Review, 64(5). doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00400.x
46. Murray, G. (2005). Democracy in the Information Age. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2).
47. Naciones Unidas. (2005). Global e-government readiness report 200: from e-government to e-inclusion. Retreived (n.d.), from www.unpan.org/egovernment5.asp
48. Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-Government and E-Democracy: A comparison of the opportunitiesin the North and South. The International Journal for Communication Studies, 64, 467-477.
49. Norris, D., Fletcher, P., & Holden, S. (2001). Is your local government plugged in? Highlights of the 2000 electronic government survey. Washington, DC: International City/Council Management Association.
50. Nugent, S. (2002). Digital Democracy in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Seminar Presentation on Trinity College.
51. OECD. (2003a). Promise and Problems of E-democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
52. OECD. (2003b). The e-Government Imperative. OECD e-Government Studies. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
53. OECD. (2005a). Evaluating public participation in policy making. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
54. OECD. (2005b). OECD Government Studies: México. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
55. OECD. (2005c). e-Government for Better Government. OECD e-Government Studies. Washington DC: OECD Publishing.
56. OECD. (2005d). Governance of Innovation Systems.: Vol. 3. Case Studies in Cross-Sectorial Policies. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
57. OECD. (2007). Participative Web and User-created Content. Washington, DC: OECD Publishing.
58. Olsson, A. (2004). Electronic Democracy and Power, en Traunmüller, R. (Ed) Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
59. Oseguera, J. (2003). Democracia y tecnología. Política Digital, 10, 58-59.
60. Pardo, T., & Kumar, T. (2007). Interorganizational Information Integration: A Key Enabler for Digital Government. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 691-715. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.004
61. Rabotnikof, N. (2005). En busca de un lugar común. México: UNAM.
62. Ramadan-Mamata, M., Lerberghe, F., & Best. (2005). European eDemocracy Award Report. Brussels, Belgium: POLITECH Institute.
63. Ranerup, A. (1999). Internet-enabled applications for local government democratization: Contradictions of the Swedish experience, en Heeks, R. (Ed.) Reinventing Government in the Information Age. London: Rutledge.
64. Rech, A. (2005). E-Citizen: Why Waiting for e-Governments? en Böhlen, Gamper, Polasek & Wimmer (Eds.) E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy. International Conference, TCGOV2005. Italia: Springer.
65. Rivera, E. (2006). Un problema de innovación institucional. Política Digital, 27, 60-61.
66. Rivera, J. (2001). e-gobierno: ¿estrategia política o tecnológica? Política Digital, 1, 24-29.
67. Rocheleau, B. (2003). Politics, Accountability and Governmental Information Systems en Garson, D. (ed.), Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
68. Roeder, S., Poppenborg, Michaelis, Märker, & Salz. (2005). Public Budget Dialogue: An innovative approach to e-Participation, en Böhlen, Gamper, Polasek & Wimmer (Eds.) E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy. International Conference, TCGOV2005. Italia: Springer.
69. Sæbo, O., & Nilsen, H. (2004). The support for different democracy models by the use of a web-based discussion board, en Traunmüller, R. (ed.) Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
70. Saward, M. (2000). Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, representation and association. London: Routledge.
71. Scott, J. (2006). "E" the people: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341-353. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00593.x
72. Scully, D. (2004). (Manuscript submitted for publication). E-democracy [Institute of Technology Tallaght. Irlanda.]. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution.
73. Smith, G. (2000). Toward deliberative Institutions, en Saward, M. (ed.) Democratic Innovation. London: Routledge.
74. Sotelo, A. (2006). México: un gobierno digital en expansión. México: Abraham Sotelo.
75. Thomas, J. (1995). Public Participation in public decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
76. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusión: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does E-Government promote accountability? A Comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability, en Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administrations and Institutions, 17, No. (2).
78. Xenakis, A., & Macintosh, A. (2004). Levels of Difficulty in Introducing e-Voting, en Traunmüller, R. (Ed.) Electronic Government: Third International Conference, EGOV2004. España: Springer.
79. Ziccardi, A. (2004a). Claves para el análisis de la participación ciudadana y las políticas sociales en el espacio local, en Ziccardi, A. (Coord.) Participación ciudadana y políticas sociales en el ámbito local. México: UNAM-IIS.
80. Ziccardi, A. (2004b). Espacios e instrumentos de participación ciudadana para las políticas sociales del ámbito local, en Ziccardi, A. (Coord.) Participación ciudadana y políticas sociales en el ámbito local. México: UNAM-IIS.