Weak states, state making, and humanitarian intervention: With a view from the People’s Republic of China

International Intervention in the Post-Cold War World: Moral Responsibility and Power Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 104-122

  Evans, Mark D ^a  

^a International Pacific College   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898154316     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315498171-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Danesh Sarooshi, Humanitarian Intervention and International Humanitarian Assistance: Law and Practice, Wilton Park Paper, no. 86 (London: HMSO, 1994), p. 1.
2. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1995), pp. 9, 13.
3. Kalevi J. Holsti, The State, War, and the State of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 28-40.
4. Mohammed Ayoob, The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict and the International System (Boulder, Colo.: Rienner, 1995).
5. Barry Buzan, “International Society and International Security,” in Rick Fawn and Jeremy Larkins, eds., International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered (London: Macmillan, 1996), p. 261.
6. Ralph Pettman, World Politics: Rationalism and Beyond (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave, 2001).
7. Ralph Pettman, “Making Sense of International Relations Theory: The Metaphysics of World Affairs” (unpublished manuscript), appendix 1.
8. Barry Buzan, “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organisation 47, no. 3 (Summer 1993): 347.
9. Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd ed. (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), chapter 8.
10. Nicholas J. Wheeler and Justin Morris, “Humanitarian Intervention and State Practice at the End of the Cold War,” in Rick Fawn and Jeremy Larkins, eds., International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 135-136.
11. Jack Donnelly, “Human Rights, Humanitarian Crises and Humanitarian Intervention,” International Journal 15, no. 2 (Autumn 1993): 610-611.
12. Bhikhu Parekh, Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory (New York: Macmillan, 2000).
13. Rick Fawn and James May all, “Recognition, Self-Determination and Secession in Post Cold War International Society,” in Rick Fawn and Jeremy Larkins, eds., International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 194-195.
14. Ivor Jennings, James Mayall, Nationalism in International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 40.
15. Thomas E. Ricks, “U.S. Urged to Embrace an ‘Imperialist’ Role,” International Herald Tribune, 22 August 2001.
16. Zaibang Wang, “Guanyu beiyue xin zhanlue yu kongxi nanlianmeng wenti de sikao” (“Pondering the Problems of NATO’s New Strategy and Its Air Attacks on the Serbian Federation”), Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi (World Economics and Politics) 6 (1999): 21-25.
17. Ping Pu, “Guoji ganyu yu xin ganshe zhuyi” (“International Intervention and New Interventionism”), Jiaoyu yu yanjiu (Education and Research) 5 (2000): 38-42.
18. Nanlai Liu, “Yi Meiguo wei shou de beiyue cubao jianta guoji fa” (“U.S. Led NATO Crudely Violates International Law”), Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi (World Economics and Politics) 6 (1999): 26.
19. Chris Brown, “Universal Human Rights: A Critique,” in Tim Dunne and Nicholas Wheeler, eds., Human Rights in Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 107-120.
20. Jack Donnelly, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1989), pp. 187-188.
21. David Shambaugh, ed., Is China Unstable? (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 2000), pp. 160-161.
22. Yongjin Zhang, China in International Society since 1949: Alienation and Beyond (London: Macmillan, 1998).
23. Lewis Fretz, “Bill Clinton’s New World Order Takes Shape,” New Zealand International Review 22, no. 6 (November-December 1997): 16-21.