Integration of field and laboratory spectral data with multi-resolution remote sensed imagery for asphalt surface differentiation

Remote Sensing

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 2765-2781

  Mei, Alessandro ^a   Salvatori, Rosamaria ^a   Fiore, Nicola ^b   Allegrini, Alessia ^a   D'Andrea, Antonio ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Asphalt; Ikonos; MIVIS; Quickbird; Spectral angle mapper

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION/VALIDATION; IKONOS; LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS; MIVIS; PSEUDO-INVARIANT TARGETS; QUICKBIRD; ROAD NETWORK MANAGEMENT; SPECTRAL ANGLE MAPPERS;

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; NETWORK MANAGEMENT; REMOTE SENSING;

ASPHALT;

EID: 84898077190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs6042765     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Themistocleous, K.; Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Retalis, A.; Chrysoulakis, N.; Michaelides, S. Precipitation effects on the selection of suitable non-variant targets intended for atmospheric correction of satellite remotely sensed imagery. Atmos. Res. 2012, 131, 73-88.
2. Gao, B.C.; Montes, M.J.; Davis, C.O.; Goetz, A.F.H. Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 17-24.
3. Karpouzli, E.; Malthus, T. The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 1143-1150.
4. Vassilakis, E. Remote sensing of environmental change in the Antirio Deltaic Fan region, Western Greece. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 2547-2560.
5. Novack, T.; Esch, T.; Kux, H.; Stilla, U. Machine learning comparison between worldview-2 and quickbird-2-simulated imagery regarding object-based urban land cover classification. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2263-2282.
6. Wang, C.; Hu, Q.; Lu, Q. Research on a novel low modulus OFBG strain sensor for pavement monitoring. Sensors 2012, 12, 10001-10013.
7. Skoglar, P.; Orguner, U.; Tornqvist, D.; Gustafsson, F. Road target search and tracking with gimballed vision sensor on an unmanned aerial vehicle. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 2076-2111.
8. Mohammadi, M. Road classification and condition determination using hyperspectral imagery. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2012, XXXIX-B7, 141-146.
9. Italos, C.; Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Alexakis, D.D.; Themistocleous, K.; Agapiou, A.; Nisantzi, A.; Papoutsa, C.; Papadavid, G. Integrated Use of Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS for the Development of a Sophisticated Sustainability Index for Urban Areas: A Case Study of Paphos City (Cyprus). In Proceedings of the 32nd EARSeL Symposium Advances in Geosciences, Mykonos Island, Greece, 21-24 May 2012; pp. 587-593.
10. Gomez, R.B. Hyperspectral imaging: A useful technology for transportation analysis. Opt. Eng. 2002, 41, 2137-2143 .
11. Herold, M.; Roberts, D.A.; Gardner, M.E.; Dennison, P.E. Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing-development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2400 nm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 91, 304-319.
12. Andreou, C.; Karathanassi, V.; Kolokoussis, P. Investigation of hyperspectral remote sensing for mapping asphalt road conditions. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 6315-6333.
13. Herold, M.; Roberts, D.; Noronha, V.; Smadi, O. Imaging spectrometry and asphalt road surveys. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2008, 16, 153-166.
14. Pascucci, S.; Bassani, C.; Palombo, A.; Poscolieri, M.; Cavalli, R. Road asphalt pavements analyzed by airborne thermal remote sensing: Preliminary results of the venice highway. Sensors 2008, 8, 1278-1296.
15. Mei, A.; Salvatori, R.; Allegrini, A. Analysis of paved areas with field data and MIVIS hyperspectral images. Ital. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 43, 147-159.
16. Mei, A.; Salvatori, R. Urban mapping using IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. Geosci. 2013, 2, 55-58.
17. Lin, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shen J. Combining multiple algorithms for road network tracking from multiple source remotely sensed imagery: A practical system and performance evaluation. Sensors 2009, 9, 1237-1258.
18. Cavalli, R.M.; Fusilli, L.; Pascucci, S.; Pignatti, S.; Santini, F. Hyperspectral sensor data capability for retrieving complex urban land cover in comparison with multispectral data: Venice city case study (Italy). Sensors 2008, 8, 3299-3320.
19. Herold, M.; Roberts, D.A. Spectral characteristics of asphalt road aging and deterioration: Implications for remote-sensing applications. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 4327-4334.
20. Cloutis, A.E. Spectral reflectance properties of hydrocarbons: Remote-sensing implications. Science 1989, 245, 165-168.
21. Claine, P.J. Chemical Composition of Asphalt as Related to Asphalt Durability, 1st ed.; Transportation Research Record: Washington, DC, USA, 1984.
22. Wentworth, C.K. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments, J. Geol. 1922, 30, 377-392.
23. Powers, M.C. A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1953, 23, 117-119.
24. Munsell, A.H. A pigment color system and notation. Am. J. Psychol. 1912, 23, 236-244.
25. Shvetsov, M.S. Concerning Some Additional Aids in Studying Sedimentary Formations; Moscow University Bulletin: Moscow, Russia, 1954; Volume 29, pp. 61-66. Available online: http://msupublishing.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=356&Itemid=100123 (accessed on 21 March 2014).
26. Bitelli, G.; Simone, A., Girardi, F.; Lantieri, C. Laser scanning on road pavements: A new approach for characterizing surface texture. Sensors 2012, 12, 9110-9128.
27. Bruno, L.; Parla, G.; Celauro, C. Image analysis for detecting aggregate gradation in asphalt mixture from planar images. Construct. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 21-30.
28. Bessa, I.S.; Castelo Branco, V.T.F.; SOARES, J.B. Evaluation of different digital image processing software for aggregates and hot mix asphalt characterizations. Construct. Build. Mater. 2012, 37, 370-378.
29. Mack, C. Physical Chemistry, Bituminous Materials; Hoiberg, A.J., Ed.; Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1964; Volume 1.
30. Mei, A.; Fiore, N.; Salvatori, R.; D'Andrea, A.; Fontana, M. Spectroradiometric laboratory measures on asphalt concrete: Preliminary results. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 53, 514-523.
31. Kruse, F.A.; Lefkoff, A.B.; Boardman, J.B.; Heidebrecht, K.B.; Shapiro, A.T.; Barloon P.J.; Goetz, A.F.H. The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS)-interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1993, 44, 145-163.
32. Small, C. High spatial resolution spectral mixture analysis of urban reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 88, 170-186.
33. Roger, R.E. Arnold, J.F. Reliability estimating the noise in AVIRIS hyperspectral images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1996, 17, 1951-1962.
34. Green, A.A.; Berman, M.; Switzer, P.; Craig, M.D. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1988, 26, 65-74.
35. Stein, A; der Meer, F.V.; Gorte, B. Spatial statistics for remote sensing: Remote sensing and digital image processing. Image Classif. Spectr. Unmix. 1999, 1, 185-193.
36. Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986.
37. Lillesand, T.M.; Kiefer, R.W.; Chipman, J.W. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
38. Congalton, R.G.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, 1st ed.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999.
39. Cohen, J.A. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 1960, 20, 37-46.