Expectations and experiences with mylabourparty: From right to know to right to participate?

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 446-462

  Lüders, Marika ^a   Følstad, Asbjørn ^a   Waldal, Espen ^b  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

^b Karenslyst allé 20   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; Innovation; Political communication; Social media

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CITIZEN'S PARTICIPATIONS; INNOVATION; LABOR PARTY; POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL COMMUNICATION; RIGHT-TO-KNOW; SOCIAL MEDIA; SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS; USER PRACTICES;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84898021989     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12047     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Calhoun, C. (1992). Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 1-48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
3. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
4. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162.
5. Di Gangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303-312.
6. Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (2007). Reconfiguring government-public engagements: Enhancing the communicative power of citizens. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
7. Eggers, W. D. (2005). Government 2.0: Using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Enzensberger, H. M. ([1970] 2003). Constituents of a theory of the media. In N. Montfort & N. Wardrip-Fruin (eds.), The new media reader (pp. 259-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426.
10. Habermas, J. ([1962] 1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity.
11. Hanssen, G. S., & Askim, J. (2008). Councillors' receipt and use of citizen input: Experience from Norwegian local government. Public Administration, 86(2), 387-409.
12. Henman, P. (2010). Governing electronically: E-government and the reconfiguration of public administration, policy, and power. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). Virtually democratic: Online communities and internet activism. In D. Barney & A. Feenberg (eds.), Community in the digital age: Philosophy and practice (pp. 183-200). Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
14. Kvale, S. (1997). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
15. Leadbeater, C. (2009). The Art of With. Retrieved 21 September, 2010, from http://www.cornerhouse.org/media/Learn/The%20Art%20of%20With.pdf
16. Lüders, M. (2008) Conceptualizing personal media. New Media and Society, 10(5), 683-702.
17. Lüders, M. (2007) Converging forms of communication? In Storsul, T. and Stuedahl, D. (Eds.), Ambivalence towards convergence (pp. 179-198). Göteborg: Nordicom.
18. Mayo, E., & Steinberg, T. (2007). The power of information: An independent review. Retrieved 2 February, 2011, from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/upload/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/strategy/power_information.pdf
19. Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
20. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in government: Why and how? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
21. Ruma, L., & Lathrop, D. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Beijing: O'Reilly Media.
22. Sevland, L. J., Berg, D. H., Brosvik, T., Kvaløy, et al. (2006). Det lokale folkestyret i endring? Om deltaking og engasjement i lokalpolitikken. Oslo: Dep. Servicesenter.
23. Skogerbø, E., & Winsvold, M. (2008). Nettet som debattarena. In G. Enli & E. Skogerbø (eds.), Digitale dilemmaer: nye medieformer, nye utfordringer (pp. 39-60). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
24. Stromer-Galley, J., & Wichowski, A. (2011). Political discussion online. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (eds.), The handbook of internet studies (pp. 168-187). Wiley-Blackwell.
25. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic 2.0. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
26. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.
27. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2010). Macrowikinomics: Rebooting business and the world. New York: Portfolio.
28. Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research intentory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 787-810.
29. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.
30. Vitale, D. (2006). Between deliberative and participatory democracy: A contribution on Habermas. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 32(6), 739-766.
31. West, D. M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.