CME congress, simulation technology, and the relationship between means and ends

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 277-229

  Olson, Curtis A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES;

EID: 84898018507     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.21149     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Scalese RJ, Obeso VT, Issenberg SB. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education [Review]. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(Suppl 1):46-49. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0283-4
2. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):783-788.
3. Cervero, RM, Wilson AL. Planning Responsibly for Adult Education: A Guide to Negotiating Power and Interests. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1994.
4. Caffarella R. Planning Programs for Adult Learners: A Practical Guide for Educators, Trainers, and Staff Developers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
5. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.
6. Fox RD. Discrepancy analysis in continuing medical education: a conceptual model. Mobius. 1983; 3:37-44.
7. Janesick, VJ. The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999:209-219.