The Use of systematic reviews in clinical trials and narrative reviews in dermatology: Is the best evidence being used?;Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible?

Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 295-299

  Conde Taboada, A ^a   Aranegui, B ^b   Garcia Doval I ^c   Davila Seijo P ^c   Gonzalez Castro U ^d  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL MONTECELO   (Spain)

^d Cochrane Skin Group ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Dermatology; Evidence based medicine; Review literature as topic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DERMATOLOGY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NARRATIVE REVIEW; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LITERATURE;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DERMATOLOGY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84897972789     PISSN: 00017310     EISSN: 15782190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2013.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. M. Clarke Doing new research? Don't forget the old PLoS Med 1 2004 e35
2. S. Ladhani, and H.C. Williams The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: A comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs systematic reviews Br J Dermatol 139 1998 66 72
3. The Cochrane Library [consultado 20 Abr 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/0/index.html
4. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS) [consultado 20 Abr 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/
5. K.F. Schulz, D.G. Altman, and D. Moher CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials BMJ 340 2010 c332
6. Z. Samaan, L. Mbuagbaw, D. Kosa, V. Borg Debono, R. Dillenburg, and S. Zhang et al. A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature J Multidiscip Healthc 6 2013 169 188
7. M. Clarke, S. Hopewell, and I. Chalmers Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting Lancet 376 2010 20 21
8. M. Clarke, S. Hopewell, and I. Chalmers Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: A status report J R Soc Med 100 2007 187 190
9. A.C. Tricco, J. Tetzlaff, B. Pham, J. Brehaut, and D. Moher Non-Cochrane vs Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: Cross-sectional study J Clin Epidemiol 62 2009 380 3860
10. E.R. Parker, L.M. Schilling, V. Diba, H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is insufficient evidence J Am Acad Dermatol 50 2004 635 639
11. H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care J Invest Dermatol 132 2012 1008 1017
12. A.N. Atallah Systematic reviews followed by clinical trials, followed by systematic reviews: This is how the uncertainties in medicine are reduced Sao Paulo Med J 125 2007 71 72