A critical view on the eco-friendliness of small hydroelectric installations

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 481, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 638-643

  Premalatha, M ^a   Tabassum Abbasi, ^a   Abbasi, Tasneem ^a,b   Abbasi, S A ^a  

^a PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental impacts; Global warming; Large hydro; Methane mining; Renewable energy; Small hydro

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOSSIL FUELS; GLOBAL WARMING; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; METHANE;

ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES; HYDROELECTRIC INSTALLATIONS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECTS; LARGE HYDRO; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SMALL HYDRO;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

METHANE;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GLOBAL WARMING; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; INSTALLATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECO-FRIENDLINESS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HABITAT QUALITY; HYDROPOWER; LARGE HYDROPOWER PROJECT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY; WATER FLOW;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; GLOBAL WARMING; LARGE HYDRO; METHANE MINING; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SMALL HYDRO;

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENERGY-GENERATING RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; GLOBAL WARMING; POWER PLANTS; WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 84897958873     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.047     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abbasi S.A., Abbasi N. The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources. Appl Energy 2000, 65:121-144.
2. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. The expertise and the practice of loss prevention in the Indian process industry. Process Saf Environ Prot 2005, 83(B5):413-420.
3. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:2134-2143.
4. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Water quality modeling: A primer. International Journal of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Systems. 2011, 2:23-35.
5. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Water and wetlands. International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering Research. 2011, 2:36-46.
6. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Renewable hydrogen: prospects and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:3034-3040.
7. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Decarbonization of fossil fuels as a strategy to control global warming. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:1828-1834.
8. Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Is the use of renewable energy sources an answer to the problems of global warming and pollution?. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2012, 42:99-154.
9. Abbasi T., Sagar Babu K., Abbasi S.A. Contribution of paddy fields to methane emissions and the strategies to control it: the Indian scenario. Int J Environ Sci Eng Res 2011, 2:1-7.
10. Abbasi T., Premlatha M., Abbasi S.A. The return to renewables: Will it help in global warming control?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011, 15:891-894.
11. Anderson E.P., Freeman M.C., Pringle C.M. Consequences of hydropower development in Central America: impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages. River Res Appl 2006, 22:397-411.
12. Bambace L.A.W., Ramos F.M., Lima I.B.T., Rosa R.R. Mitigation and recovery of methane emissions from tropical hydroelectric dams. Energy 2007, 32:1038-1046.
13. Boustani F. An assessment of the small hydropower potential of sisakht region of Yasuj, World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology. 2009, 57:2009.
14. Cada G., Ahlgrimm J., Bahleda M., Bigford T., Stavrakas S.D., Hall D., Moursund R., Sale M. Potential Impacts of Hydrokinetic and Wave Energy Conversion Technologies on Aquatic Environments. Fisheries. 2007, 32:174-181.
15. Carvajal-Quintero S.X., Marín-Jiménez J.D., Arango-Aramburo S. Feasibility of intentional islanding operation with small hydropower plants. Proceedings of the 2012 6th IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution: Latin America Conference and Exposition, T and D-LA 2012 2012, [art. no. 6319066].
16. Chari K.B., Sharma Richa, Abbasi S.A. Comprehensive environmental impact assessment of water resources projects 2005, volume 1. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, [xvi+580 pages].
17. Chari K.B., Sharma Richa, Abbasi S.A. Comprehensive environmental impact assessment of water resources projects 2005, volume 2. Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, [xvi+581-724 pages].
18. Cortes R.M.V., Ferreira M.T., Oliveira S.V., Godinho G. Contrasting impact of small dams on the macroinvertebrates of two Iberian mountain rivers. Hydrobiologia. 2002, 389:51-61.
19. Darmawi R.S., Siti M.B., Momon S.I. Renewable energy and hydropower utilization tendency worldwide. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 17:213-215.
20. Delsontro T., Mcginnis M., Sobek S., Ostrovsky I., Wehrli B. Extreme methane emissions from a Swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments. Environ Sci Tech 2010, 44:2419-2425.
21. Deshpande-Dandekar P. Neither small, nor green. The Hindu 2013, 136:7.
22. Doukas H., Karakosta C., Psarras J. RES technology transfer within the new climate regime: a "helicopter" view under the CDM. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(5):1138-1143.
23. Draisey I. Working together: understanding the effects of small hydropower. Refocus 2002, 3(4):58-59.
24. Duchemin E., Lucotte M., Canuel R. Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions form an old tropical reservoir with those from other reservoirs worldwide. Verh Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol 2000, 27:1391-1395.
25. Dudhan S., Sinha A.K., Inamdar S.S. Assessment of small hydropower potential using remote sensing data for sustainable development in India. Energy Policy 2006, 34:3195-3205.
26. Egre D., Milewski J.C. The diversity of hydropower projects. Energy Policy 2002, 30:1225-1230.
27. Fearnside P.M. Greenhouse gas emissions from hydroelectric dams in tropical forests. The Encyclopedia of Energy 2011, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
28. Fearnside P.M. Do hydroelectric dams mitigate global warming? The case of Brazil's Curuá-Una Dam. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2005, 10:675-691.
29. Fearnside P. Belo Monte Dam: a spearhead for Brazil's dam-building attack on Amazonia? GWS Discussion Paper 1210. Energy environment 2012, 1-6. [http://www.globalwaterforum.org/2012/03/19/belo-monte-dam-a-spearhead-for-brazils-dam-building-attack-on-amazonia/].
30. Forster P., et al. Changes in atmospheric constituents and radiative forcing. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 129-234. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, [996 pp.]. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
31. Giles J. Methane quashes green credentials of hydropower. Nature 2006, 444:524-525.
32. Gorshkov V.G., Makarieva A.M., Mackey B., Gorshkov V. How valid are the biological and ecological principles underpinning Global Change science?. Energy and Environment. 2002, 13:299-310.
33. Grumbine R.E., Pandit M.K. Threats from India's Himalaya Dams. Science 2013, 339:36-37.
34. Guérin F., Abril G., Tremblay A., Delmas R. Nitrous oxide emissions from tropical hydroelectric reservoirs. Geophys Res Lett 2008, 35(6):71-79.
35. Hanley B. Providing clean power through micro hydro 2012, [http://www.wwf.or.id/en/news_facts/new_articles/?24140/Providing-clean-power-through-micro-hydro; last accessed June 2012].
36. Harrison D., Opperman J., Richter B. Can hydropower be sustainable?. Int J Water Power Dam Constr 2007, 59(10):22-25.
37. Harte J., Jassby A. Energy technologies and natural environments: the search for compatibility. Annu Rev Energy 1978, 3(1):101-146.
38. Hoffert-Hay D. Small dam removal in Oregon [last accessed June 2012]. http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB.
39. Huang H., Yan Z. Present situation and future prospect of hydropower in China. Renew Sustain Energy 2009, 13:1652-1656.
40. Huesemann M.H. The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2003, 5:21-34.
41. Huesemann M.H. Can advances in science and technology prevent global warming? A critical review of limitations and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 2006, 11:539-577.
42. Huesemann M.H., Huesmann J.A. Will progress in science and technology avert or accelerate global collapse? A critical analysis and policy recommendations. Environ Dev Sustain 2008, 10:787-825.
43. IEA Benign energy? The environmental implications of renewables 1998, 128. International Energy Agency.
44. International Energy Agency (IEA) Hydropower and the environment: present context and guidelines for future action [182 pp.]. http://www.ieahydro.org/reports/HyA3S5V2.pdf.
45. IPCC Summary for policymakers. IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (Eds.).
46. Jansson R., Nilsson C., Renofalt B. Fragmentation of riparian floras in rivers with multiple dams. Ecology 2000, 81:899-903.
47. Kibler K.M., Tullos D.D. Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China. Water Resour Res 2013, 49:1-15.
48. Kingsford R.T., Thomas R.F. Destruction of wetlands and waterbird populations by dams and irrigation on the Murrumbidgee River in arid Australia. Environ Manage 2004, 34(3):383-396.
49. Kosnik L. The potential of water power in the fight against global warming in the US. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3252-3265.
50. Lessard J., Hayes D.B. Effects of elevated water temperature on fish and macroinvertebrate communities below small dams. River Res Appl 2003, 10.1002/rra.713.
51. Leung P. The development of a novel hydro-electric plant for rivers and oceans. IMechE Event Publications 2004, 51-58.
52. Lima I.B.T., Ramos F.M., Bambace L.A.W., Rosa R.R. Methane emissions from large dams as renewable energy sources: a developing nation perspective. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 2008, 13(2):193-206.
53. Mantel S.K., Hughes D.A., Muller N.W.J. Ecological impacts of small dams on South African rivers part 1: drivers of change-water quantity and quality. Water SA 2010, 36(3):351-360.
54. Melack J.M., Hess L.L., Gastil M., Forsberg B.R., Hamilton S.K., Lima I.B.T., Noro E.M.L.M. Regionalization of methane emission in the Amazon Basin with microwave 645 remote sensing. Glob Chang Biol 2004, 10:530-544.
55. Miller V.B., Landis A.E., Schaefer L.A. A benchmark for life cycle air emissions and life cycle impact assessment of hydrokinetic energy extraction using life cycle assessment. Renew Energy 2011, 36:1040e1046.
56. Ministry of Water Resources (MWR) Small hydropower station design specifications Ref. No.: GB50071-2002 2002, Chinese Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, China.
57. MNRE 2013, Ministry of New Renewable Energy, http://www.mnre.gov.in/ last accessed November 2013.
58. Montes G.M., del Mar Serrano López M., del Carmen Rubio Gámez M., Ondina A.M. An overview of renewable energy in Spain. The small hydro-power case. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2005, 9(5):521-534.
59. Nilsson C., Reidy C.A., Dynesius M., Reveng A.C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science. 2005, 308:405-408.
60. Ortolano L., Cushing K.K. Grand Coulee dam 70 years later: what can we learn?. International Journal of Water Resource Development. 2010, 18:373-390.
61. Paish O. Small hydro power: technology and current status. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2002, 6(6):537-556.
62. Park J.H., Lee N.J., Wata J.V., Hwang Y.C., Kim Y.T., Lee Y.H. Analysis of a pico tubular-type hydro turbine performance by runner blade shape using CFD. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2012, 15 (PART 4). [art. no. 042031].
63. Pascale A., Urmee T., Moore A. Life cycle assessment of a community hydroelectric power system in rural Thailand. Renew Energy 2011, 36(11):2799-2808.
64. Phillips T. Amazon tribes fear disaster, Guardian Newspapers Limited, Reproduced by the Hindu: 7, 2009.
65. Poff N.L., Olden J.D., Merritt D.M., Pepin D.M. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104:5732-5737.
66. Qiu J. Trouble on the Yangtze. Science 2012, 336:288-291.
67. Ramaswamy M., Iyer R.R. A damage report. The Hindu 2009, 9.
68. Ramos F.M., Bambace L.A.W., Lima I.B.T., Rosa R.R., Mazzi E.A., Fearnside P.M. Methane stocks in tropical hydropower reservoirs as a potential energy source: an editorial essay. Clim Change 2009, 93(1):1-13.
69. Reddy V.R., Uitto J.I., Frans D.R., Matin N. Achieving global environmental benefits through local development of clean energy? The case of small hilly hydel in India. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):4069-4080.
70. Restrepo J.D., Cantera J.R. Discharge diversion in the Patía River delta, the Colombian Pacific: geomorphic and ecological consequences for mangrove ecosystems. JS Am Earth Sci 2013, 46:183-198.
71. Ribeiro F.M., Silva G.A. Life-cycle inventory for hydroelectric generation: a Brazilian cast study. J Clean Prod 2010, 18:44-54.
72. Ronayne M. The cultural and environmental impact of large dams in southeast Turkey. The cultural and environmental impact of large dams in southeast Turkey 2005, 1-159.
73. Rupasinghe B.W.H.A., de Silva S.N.E. Environmental impacts of mini hydropower projects in Sri Lanka. International Conference on Small Hydropower-Hydro Sri Lanka, Colombo 2007, 22-24.
74. Sanchez P.A. Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa. Nat Geosci 2010, 3:299-300.
75. Santos M.A., Rosa L.P., Sikard B., Sikarb E., Santos E.O. Gross greenhouse gas fluxes from hydro-power reservoir compared to thermo-power plants. Energy Policy 2006, 34:481-488.
76. Shindell D.T., Faluvegi G., Koch D.M., Schmidt G.A., Unger N., Bauer S.E. Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 2009, 326:716-718.
77. Sinclair A.J. Assessing the impacts of micro-hydro development in the Kullu District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Mt Res Dev 2003, 23:11-13.
78. Sukumaran C.V. The curse of scientific fundamentalism. The Hindu 2012, 135:10.
79. Tauseef S.M., Premalatha M., Abbasi T., Abbasi S.A. Methane capture from livestock manure. J Environ Manage 2013, 117:187-207.
80. Taylor S., Upadhyay D., Laguna M. Flowing to the east-small hydro in developing countries. Renew Energy World 2006, 23:11-15.
81. Varun Prakash R., Bhat I.K. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions estimation for small hydropower schemes in India. Energy 2012, 44:498-508.
82. WCD (WORLD Commission On Dams) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making 2000, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London and Sterling, [URL: http://www.dams.org/report/contents.htm. last accessed June 2012].
83. Yüksel I. Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 2010, 35:1469-1476.
84. Zhou X., Xiao B., Ochieng R., Yang J. Utilization of carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass for energy in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(2):479-485.
85. Ziv G., Baran E., Nam S., Rodríguez-Iturbed I., Levina S.A. Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012, 109:5609-5614.