Local cattle movements in response to ongoing bovine tuberculosis zonation and regulations in Michigan, USA

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 114, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 201-212

  Grear, Daniel A ^a   Kaneene, John B ^b   Averill, James J ^c   Webb, Colleen T ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Michigan Dept of Agriculture and Rural Development   (United States)

Author keywords

Accreditation zone; Bovine tuberculosis; Cattle movement; Dynamic network; Michigan; Mycobacterium bovis

Indexed keywords

BOS; BOVINAE; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS;

ANIMAL; BOVINE; DEER; DISEASE CARRIER; LAW; TIME; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE; UNITED STATES; WILD ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; CATTLE; DEER; DISEASE RESERVOIRS; LEGISLATION, VETERINARY; MICHIGAN; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPORTATION; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE;

EID: 84897957633     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Azner M.N., Stevenson M.A., Zarich L., Leon E.A. Analysis of cattle movements in Argentina, 2005. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 98:119-127.
2. Bajardi P., Barrat A., Natale F., Savini L., Colizza V. Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19869.
3. Bigras-Poulin M., Thompson R.A., Chriel M., Mortensen S., Griener M. Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 76:11-39.
4. Buhnerkempe M.G., Grear D.A., Portacci K., Miller R.S., Lombard J.E., Webb C.T. A national-scale picture of U.S. cattle movements obtained from Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection data. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 112:318-329.
5. Christley R.M., Robinson S.E., Lysons R., French N.P. Network analysis of cattle movement in Great Britain. Proc. Soc. Vet. Epidemiol. Prev. Med. 2005, 234-243.
6. Christly R.M., Robinson S.E., Moore B., Setzkorn C., Donald I. Responses of farmers to introduction in England and Wales of pre-movement testing for bovine tuberculosis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 100:126-133.
7. Conlan A.J.K., McKinley T.J., Karolemeas K., Brooks-Pollock E., Goodchild A.V., Mitchell A.P., Birch C.P.D., Clifton-Hadley R.S., Wood J.L.N. Estimating the hidden burden of bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. PLoS Comp. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002730.
8. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
9. DEFRA Extract of the Executive Summary and Figures From the Annual Surveillance Report for the Period January-December 2010 2010, (accessed on 29.07.13). http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/Surveillance-annual-report-2010.pdf.
10. DEFRA Extract of the Executive Summary and Figures From the Annual Surveillance Report for the Period January-December 2011 2011, (accessed on 29.07.13). http://www.defra.gov.uk/ahvla-en/files/pub-survreport-tb11.pdf.
11. Dubé C., Ribble C., Kelton D., McNab B. Comparing network analysis measures to determine potential epidemic size of highly contagious exotic diseases in fragmented monthly networks of dairy cattle movements in Ontario, Canada. Trans. Emerg. Dis. 2008, 55:382-392.
12. Dubé C., Ribble C., Kelton D., McNab B. Introduction to network analysis and its implications for animal disease modeling. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2011, 30:425-436.
13. Gopal R., Goodchild A., Hewinson G., Domenech R., Clifton-Hadley R. Introduction of bovine tuberculosis to northeast England by bought-in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2006, 159:265-271.
14. Handcock M.S., Hunter D.R., Butts C.R., Goodreau S.M., Morris M. Statnet: software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis, and simulation of network data. J. Stat. Soft. 2008, 24:1-11.
15. Humblet M.F., Boschiroli M.L., Saegerman C. Classification of worldwide bovine tuberculosis risk factors in cattle: a stratified approach. Vet. Res. 2009, 40:50. 10.1051/vetres/2009033.
16. Kaneene J.B., Bruning-Fann C.S., Granger L.M., Miller R., Porter-Spalding B.A. Environmental and farm management factors associated with tuberculosis on cattle farms in northeastern Michigan. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2002, 221:837-842.
17. Kao R.R., Green D.M., Johnson J., Kiss I.Z. Disease dynamics over very different time-scales: foot-and-mouth disease and scrapie on the network of livestock movements in the UK. J. Roy. Soc. Inter. 2007, 4:907-916.
18. Karolemeas K., McKinley T.J., Clifton-Hadley R.S., Goodchild A.V., Mitchell A., Johnston W.T., Conlan A.J.K., Donnelly C.A., Wood J.L.N. Predicting prolonged bovine tuberculosis breakdowns in Great Britain as an aid to control. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 97:183-190.
19. León E.A., Stevenson M.A., Duffy S.J., Ledesma M., Morris R.S. A description of cattle movements in two departments of Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 76:109-120.
20. MDARD Bovine TB Split State Status and Zoning Rules, Information for Michigan Cattlemen 2011, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Available at: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/emergingdiseases/bovine_TB_SSS__Zoning_Final_as_of_9-26-11_364559_7.pdf (accessed on 29.07.13).
21. Miller R.S., Sweeney S.J. Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141:1357-1370.
22. Mweu M.M., Fournie G., Halasa T., Toft N., Nielsen S.S. Temporal characterization of the network of Danish cattle movements and its implication for disease control: 2000-2009. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 110:379-387.
23. Newman M.E.J. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67:1-13.
24. Noremark M., Hakansson N., Sternberg-Lewerin S., Lindberg A., Jonsson A. Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 99:78-90.
25. O'Brien D.J., Schmitt S.M., Fitzgerald S.D., Berry D.E., Hickling G.J. Managing the wildlife reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis: the Michigan, USA, experience. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 112:313-323.
26. Okafor C.C., Grooms D.L., Brunning-Fann C.S., Averill J.J., Kaneene J.B. Descriptive epidemiology of bovine tuberculosis in Michigan (1975-2010): lessons learned. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, Article ID 874924. 10.4061/2011/874924.
27. Ortiz-Palaez A., Pfieffer D.U., Soares-Magalhaes R.J., Guitan F.J. Use of social network analysis to characterize the pattern of animal movements in the initial phases of the 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 76:40-55.
28. Robinson S.E., Christly R.M. Exploring the role of auction markets in cattle movements within Great Britain. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 81:21-37.
29. Schmitt S.M., Fitzgerald S.D., Cooley T.M., Brunning-Fann C.S., Sullivan L., Berry D., Carlson T., Minnis R.B., Payeur J.B., Sikarskie J. Bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging white-tailed deer from Michigan. J. Wild. Dis. 1997, 33:749-758.
30. Skuce R.A., Allen A.R., McDowell W.M.J. Herd-level risk factors for bovine tuberculosis: a literature review. Vet. Med. Int. 2012, Article ID 621210. 10.1155/2012/621210.
31. USDA APHIS Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication: Uniform Methods and Rules, Effective 2005, January, http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/tuberculosis/downloads/tb-umr.pdf.
32. Van Schaik G., Schukken Y.H., Dijkhuizen A.A., Barkema H.W., Benedictus G. Probability of and risk factors for introduction of infectious diseases into Dutch SPF dairy farms: a cohort study. Prev. Vet. Med. 2002, 54:279-289.