Robust mediation analysis based on median regression

Psychological Methods

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-20

  Yuan, Ying ^a   MacKinnon, David P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heavy tailed; Heteroscedastic; Mediation effect; Ordinary least squares; Outlier

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIOLOGY; STATISTICS;

HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL SCIENCES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84897953061     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0033820     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in statistical data (3rd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
4. Biesanz, J. C., Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 661-701.
5. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115-140.
6. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1988). Heterogeneity of variance in experimental studies: A challenge to standard interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 396-404.
7. Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., & Flaherty, B. P. (1998). An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 295-312.
8. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
9. Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 171-185.
10. Elashoff, J. D., & Elashoff, R. M. (1978). Effects of errors in statistical assumptions. In W. H. Kruskal & J. M. Tanur (Eds.), International encyclopedia of statistics (pp. 229-250). New York, NY: Free Press.
11. Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods. American Psychologist, 63, 591-601.
12. Finch, J. F., West, S. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87-107.
13. Geraci, M., & Bottai, M. (2007). Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Biostatistics, 8, 140-154.
14. Grissom, R. J. (2000). Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 155-165.
15. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2001). Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. Psychological Methods, 6, 135-146.
16. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/ process2012.pdf
18. Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroscedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 709 -722.
19. Hill, M., & Dixon, W. J. (1982). Robustness in real life: A study of clinical laboratory data. Biometrics, 38, 377-396.
20. Hogg, R. V. (1974). Adaptive robust procedures: A partial review and some suggestions for future applications and theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 909-923.
21. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15, 309-334.
23. Jo, B., Stuart, E. A., MacKinnon, D. P., & Vinokur, A. D. (2011). The use of propensity scores in mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 425-452.
24. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, 233-265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
25. Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115-128.
26. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
27. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., Wilcox, R. R., & Deering, K. (2008). A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychological Methods, 13, 110- 129.
28. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
29. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33-50.
31. Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in RCTs. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877-883.
32. Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23, 418-444.
33. Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
34. Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579-619.
35. Lockwood, C. M. (1999). Effects of nonnormality on tests of mediation (Unpublished master's thesis). Arizona State University, Tempe.
36. Lockwood, C. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1998). Bootstrapping the standard error of the mediated effect. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 997-1002). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
37. Lomnicki, Z. A. (1967). On the distribution of products of random variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. Methodological, 29, 513-524.
38. Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. American Statistician, 54, 217-224.
39. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
40. MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediating effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144 -158.
41. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
42. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Brown, C. H., Wang, W., & Hoffman, J. M. (2007). The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit regression. Clinical Trials, 4, 499 -513.
43. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
44. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128.
45. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
46. Meeker, W. Q., Jr., Cornwell, L. W., & Aroian, L. A. (1981). Selected tables in mathematical statistics: Vol. 7. The product of two normally distributed random variables. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
47. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
48. Muthén, B. (2011). Applications of causally defined direct and indirect effects in mediation analysis using SEM in Mplus. Unpublished manuscript.
49. Pearl, J. (2010). The mediation formula: A guide to the assessment of causal pathways in non-linear models (Tech. Rep. R-363). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
50. Powell, J. L. (1991). Estimation of monotonic regression models under quantile restrictions. In W. A. Barnett, J. Powell, & G. Tauchen (Eds.), Nonparametric and semiparametric methods in econometrics: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics (pp. 357-384). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
53. Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
54. SAS Institute. (2003). SAS (Version 9.1) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
55. Schrader, R. M., & Hettmansperger, T. P. (1980). Robust analysis of variance. Biometrika, 67, 93-101.
56. Serlin, R. C., & Harwell, M. R. (2004). More powerful tests of predictor subsets in regression analysis under nonnormality. Psychological Methods, 9, 492-509.
57. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
58. Tomarken, A. J., & Serlin, R. C. (1986). Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 90 -99.
59. VanderWeele, T. J. (2010). Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology, 21, 540-551.
60. VanderWeele, T. J., & Vansteelandt, S. (2009). Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statistics and Its Interface, 2, 457-468.
61. Verbeke, G., & Lesaffre, E. (1997). The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 23, 541-556.
62. Vinokur, A. D., & Schul, Y. (1997). Mastery and inoculation against setbacks as active ingredients in the JOBS intervention for the unemployed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 867-877.
63. Wegman, E. J., & Carroll, R. J. (1977). A Monte Carlo study of robust estimators of location. Communications in Statistics: Series A. Theory and Methods, 6, 795-812.
64. West, S. G. (2011). Editorial: Introduction to the special section on causal inference in cross sectional and longitudinal mediational models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 812-815.
65. Wilcox, R. R. (1998). How many discoveries have been lost by ignoring modern statistical methods? American Psychologist, 53, 300-314.
66. Wilcox, R. R., & Keselman, H. J. (2003). Modern robust data analysis methods: Measures of central tendency. Psychological Methods, 8, 254- 274.
67. Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 301-322.
68. Yuan, Y., & Yin, G. (2010). Bayesian quantile regression for longitudinal studies with nonignorable missing data. Biometrics, 66, 105-114.
69. Zu, J., & Yuan, K. (2010). Local influence and robust procedures for mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 1-44.