The social construction of a land cover map and its implications for Geographical Information Systems (GIS) as a management tool

Land Use Policy

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 44-53

  Straume, Kjersti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Area class map; Experiential categories; GIS; Grounded theory; Land cover; Land use

Indexed keywords

GIS; LAND COVER; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; MAPPING; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

NORWAY;

EID: 84897931298     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aase T.H., Fossåskaret E. Skapte virkeligheter: kvalitativt orientert metode 2007, 197. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
2. Ahlqvist O. Semantic issues in land-cover analysis: representation, analysis, and visualization. Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover: Principles and Applications 2012, 25-33. CRC Press, New York. C.P. Giri (Ed.).
3. Axelsen B., Jones M. Are all maps mental maps?. Geo Journal 1987, 14:447-464.
4. Bjørdal I., Bjørkelo K. AR5 klassifikasjonssystem: klassifikasjon av arealresurser. Håndbok fra Skog og Landskap 01 2006, 25. Skog og Landskap, Ås, Norge.
5. Burrough P.A., Mcdonnell R.A. Principles of Geographical Information Systems 1998, 333. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Børve K., Hjukse O. Totalkalkylen for jordbruket. Jordbrukets totalregnskap 2010 og 2011. Budsjett 2012 2012, 201. Budsjettnemnda for jordbruket, Oslo.
7. Chrisman N. Exploring Geographic Information Systems 1997, 305. Wiley, New York.
8. Comber A., Fisher P., Wadsworth R. Actor-network theory: a suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop?. Land Use Policy 2003, 20:299-309.
9. Comber A.J. The separation of land cover from land use using data primitives. J. Land Use Sci. 2008, 3:215-229.
10. Comber A.J., Wadsworth R.A., Fisher P.F. Using semantics to clarify the conceptual confusion between land cover and land use: the example of 'forest'. J. Land Use Sci. 2008, 3:185-198.
11. Crang M., Cook I. Doing Ethnographies 2007, 244. Sage, Los Angeles.
12. Di Gregorio A. Land Cover Classification System: Classification Concepts and User Manual (LCCS) 2005, 190. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
13. Dunn C.E. Participatory GIS - a people's GIS?. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2007, 31:616-637.
14. Engan G. 3Q Instruks for flybildetolking. NIJOS rapport 2004, Norsk institutt for jord- og skogkartlegging, Ås, Norge, 52 pp.
15. Fisher P., Comber A.J., Wadsworth R. Land use and land cover: contradiction or complement. Re-presenting GIS 2005, 85-98. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK. P. Fisher, D. Unwin (Eds.).
16. Gobo G. Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. Qualitative Research Practice 2006, 405-426. Sage, London. C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium, D. Silverman (Eds.).
17. Habermas J. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, The Theory of Communicative Action 1987, vol. 2:457. Beacon Press, Boston.
18. Harvey F., Chrisman N. Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environ. Plan. A 1998, 30:1683-1694.
19. Jansen L.J.M., Di Gregorio A. Parametric land cover and land-use classifications as tools for environmental change detection. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 91:89-100.
20. Jones M., Stenseke M. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 27-44. Springer, Dordrecht.
21. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind 1987, 614. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Landbruks og Matdepartementet Statsbudsjettet 2009 - Tildelingsbrev til Norsk Institutt for Skog og Landskap 2009, http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/LMD/Vedlegg/Brev/Tildelingsbrev_Skog_og_landskap_2009.pdf (accessed 27.06.13).
23. Mark D.M., Csillag F. The nature of boundaries on 'area-class' maps. Cartographica 1989, 26:65-78.
24. Mccall M.K., Minang P.A. Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: claiming community forests in Cameroon. Geogr. J. 2005, 171:340-356.
25. Refsgaard K., Prestegard S. Modelling policies for multifunctional agriculture and rural development - a Norwegian approach. Presentation at the 107th EAA Seminar Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies 2008.
26. Rhoads B.L., Wilson D. Observing our world. Research Methods in Geography: A Critical Introduction 2010, 26-40. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA. B. Gomez, J.P. Jones (Eds.).
27. Robbins P. Fixed categories in a portable landscape: the causes and consequences of land-cover categorization. Environ. Plan. A 2001, 33:161-179.
28. Statens Landbruksforvaltning Tildeling av midler for 2009 til produksjon og vedlikehold av DMK, rapport fra resultatkontroll, og kompetansesenter for skogbruksplanlegging 2009, Statens Landbruksforvaltning, Oslo, Norge, 1 pp.
29. Statens Landbruksforvaltning Arealtilskudd 2012, https://www.slf.dep.no/no/miljo-og-okologisk/areal-og-jordvern/arealtilskudd#arealtilskudd (accessed 24.05.12).
30. Statistics Norway Jordbruk: Utviklinga i jordbruket 2010, http://www.ssb.no/jordbruk/ (accessed 10.12.12).
31. Stokstad G., Puschmann O. Status og utvikling i jordbrukets kulturlandskap Hordaland, Sogn og Fjordane, Møre og Romsdal, Sør-Trøndelag og Nord-Trøndelag 2011, Norsk Institutt for Skog og Landskap, Rapport fra Skog og Landskap, Ås, 96 pp.
32. Strand G.-H., Eriksen R. Markslag og skogstatistikk: Jordbrukets kulturlandskap 2008, Skog og Landskap, Ressursoversikt fra Skog og landskap 01, Ås, 49 pp.
33. Straume K. Monitoring Norwegian farmland loss through periodically updated land cover map data. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Nor. J. Geogr. 2013, 67:36-48.
34. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 1998, 312. Sage, California, USA.
35. Verburg P.H., Neumann K., Nol L. Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17:974-989.
36. Wright D.J., Duncan S.L., Lach D. Social power and GIS technology: a review and assessment of approaches for natural resource management. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2009, 99:254-272.