Systems genetics: A paradigm to improve discovery of candidate genes and mechanisms underlying complex traits

Plant Science

Volumn 223, Issue , 2014, Pages 45-48

  Feltus, F Alex ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Co expression network; EQTL; Genotype phenotype; Systems genetics

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETICS; PLANT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; PLANTS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84897906978     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Farber C.R. Systems genetics: a novel approach to dissect the genetic basis of osteoporosis. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2012, 10:228-235.
2. Nadeau J.H., Dudley A.M. Systems genetics. Science 2011, 331:1015-1016.
3. Li H., Deng H. Systems genetics, bioinformatics and eQTL mapping. Genetica 2010, 138:915-924.
4. Brem R.B., Yvert G., Clinton R., Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 2002, 296:752-755.
5. West M.A., et al. Global eQTL mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2007, 175:1441-1450.
6. Wang J., et al. A global analysis of QTLs for expression variations in rice shoots at the early seedling stage. Plant J. 2010, 63:1063-1074.
7. Liu F., et al. Gene expression profiles deciphering rice phenotypic variation between Nipponbare (Japonica) and 93-11 (Indica) during oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8632.
8. Faraji F., et al. An integrated systems genetics screen reveals the transcriptional structure of inherited predisposition to metastatic disease. Genome Res. 2014, 24:227-240.
9. Goff S.A., et al. The iPlant collaborative: cyberinfrastructure for plant biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:34.
10. Butte A.J., Tamayo P., Slonim D., Golub T.R., Kohane I.S. Discovering functional relationships between RNA expression and chemotherapeutic susceptibility using relevance networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:12182-12186.
11. Barrett T., et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets - 10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D1005-D1010.
12. Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 2011, 333:601-607.
13. Feltus F.A., Ficklin S.P., Gibson S.M., Smith M.C. Maximizing capture of gene co-expression relationships through pre-clustering of input expression samples: an Arabidopsis case study. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013, 7:44.
14. Miyao A., et al. A large-scale collection of phenotypic data describing an insertional mutant population to facilitate functional analysis of rice genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63:625-635.
15. Ayroles J.F., et al. Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:299-307.
16. Ficklin S.P., Feltus F.A. A systems genetics approach and data mining tool to assist in the discovery of genes underlying complex traits in Oryza sativa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e68551.
17. Plaisier C.L., et al. A systems genetics approach implicates USF1, FADS3, and other causal candidate genes for familial combined hyperlipidemia. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000642.
18. Zhang Y., et al. Systematic analysis, comparison, and integration of disease based human genetic association data and mouse genetic phenotypic information. BMC Med. Genomics 2010, 3:1.
19. McMullen M.D., et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 2009, 325:737-740.
20. Mace E.S., Hunt C.H., Jordan D.R. Supermodels: sorghum and maize provide mutual insight into the genetics of flowering time. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:1377-1395.