Can we trust peer-reviewed science?;Pouvons-nous nous fier à la science évaluée par les pairs?

Canadian Veterinary Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 109-111

  Gyles, Carlton ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ETHICS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STANDARD; STATISTICS; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

EID: 84897784560     PISSN: 00085286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Beall J. List of publishers: Beall's List. Available from: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ Last Accessed December 14, 2013.
2. Anonymous. Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab. The Economist. Available from: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists- think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Last Accessed December 14, 2013.
3. Second response to the Bohannon article 2013-10-18. Available from: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=news&nId=317&uiLanguage=en Last Accessed December 14, 2013.
4. Meagher P. Why the Economist is wrong about science reproducibility. Available from: http://www.jove.com/blog/2013/10/21/the-medium-is-the-massage- what-the-economist-failed-to-mention-on-reproducibility Last Accessed December 14, 2013.