Analogy, cognitive architecture and universal construction: A tale of two systematicities

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Phillips, Steven ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOGY; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY;

COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84897747929     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089152     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fodor JA, Pylyshyn ZW (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.
2. Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci 7: 47-59.
3. Phillips S, Wilson WH (2010) Categorial compositionality: A category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000858.
4. Phillips S, Wilson WH (2011) Categorial compositionality II: Universal constructions and a general theory of (quasi-)systematicity in human cognition. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002102.
5. Phillips S, Wilson WH (2012) Categorial compositionality III: F-(co)algebras and the systematicity of recursive capacities in human cognition. PLoS ONE 7: e35028.
6. Phillips S, Wilson WH (2014) A category theory explanation for systematicity: Universal constructions. In: Calvo P, Symons J, editors, Systematicity and Cognitive Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, chapter 9. p. xx. In press.
7. Mac Lane S (2000) Categories for the working mathematician. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York, NY: Springer, 2nd edition.
8. McLaughlin BP (2009) Systematicity redux. Synthese 170: 251-274.
9. Fodor JA, McLaughlin BP (1990) Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work. Cognition 35: 183-204.
10. Aizawa K (2003) The systematicity arguments. Studies in Mind and Brain. New York: Kluwer Academic.
11. van Gelder T (1990) Compositionality: A connectionist variation on a classical theme. Cognitive Sci 14: 355-384.
12. Fodor JA (2008) LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Goguen J (1991) A categorical manifesto. Math Structures Comput Sci 1: 49-67.
14. Bird R, de Moor O (1997) Algebra of programming. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.
15. Crole RL (1993) Categories for types. New York: NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Manes EG, Arbib MA (1986) Algebraic approaches to program semantics. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
17. Walters RFC (1991) Categories and computer science. Cambridge Computer Science Texts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Awodey S (2006) Category theory. Oxford Logic Guides. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Halford GS, Wilson WH, Phillips S (1998) Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behav Brain Sci 21: 803-831.
20. Halford GS, Baker R, McCredden JE, Bain JD (2005) How many variables can humans process? Psychol Sci 16: 70-76. (Pubitemid 40176530)
21. Halford GS, Phillips S, Wilson WH, McCredden J, Andrews G, et al. (2007) Relational processing is fundamental to the central executive and is limited to four variables. In: Osaka N, Logie R, D'Esposito M, editors, The Cognitive Neuroscience of working memory, New York: Oxford University Press, chapter 16. pp. 261-280.
22. Bird R (1998) Introduction to functional programming using Haskell. Prentice Hall Series in Computer Science. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall, 2nd edition.
23. Phillips S, Wilson WH, Halford GS (2009) What do Transitive Inference and Class Inclusion have in common? Categorical (co)products and cognitive development. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000599.
24. Forbus KD, Gentner D, Law K (1995) A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Sci 19: 141-205.
25. Doumas LA, Hummel JE, Sandhofer CM (2008) A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychol Rev 115: 1-43.
26. Eilenberg S, Mac Lane S (1945) General theory of natural equivalences. T Am Math Soc 58: 231-294.
27. Bird R, de Moor O (1993) Solving optimisation problems with catamorphisms, Berlin, Germany: Springer, volume 669 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 45-66.
28. Gentner D, Forbus KD (2010) Computational models of analogy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2: 266-276.
29. Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ (1997) Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychol Rev 104: 427-466.
30. Clark S, Coecke B, Sadrzadeh M (2008) A compositional distributional model of meaning. In: Bruza P, Lawless W, van Rijsbergen K, Sofge D, Coecke B, et al editors, Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Quantum Interaction. Oxford, England: College Publications, pp. 133-140.
31. Gentner D (2003) Why we're so smart. In: Gentner D, Goldin-Meadow S, editors, Language in mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Advances in the study of language and thought, chapter 8. pp. 195-235.