On optimal recovery from terminal understeer

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

Volumn 228, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 412-425

  Klomp, Matthijs ^a   Lidberg, Mathias ^b   Gordon, Timothy J ^c  

^a EAAM Drivline Systems   (Sweden)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automotive systems; braking dynamics; passenger vehicles; vehicle braking systems; vehicle control systems; Vehicle dynamics; vehicle engineering; vehicle safety systems

Indexed keywords

BRAKES; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROLLERS; FRICTION; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; SAFETY ENGINEERING; VEHICLES;

AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS; BRAKING DYNAMICS; PASSENGER VEHICLES; VEHICLE BRAKING; VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM; VEHICLE DYNAMICS; VEHICLE ENGINEERING; VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS;

BRAKING;

EID: 84897713177     PISSN: 09544070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954407013511796     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Liu C and Subramanian R. Factors related to fatal single-vehicle run-off-road crashes. Report NHTSA DOT HS 811 232, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 2009
2. Liu C and Ye TJ. Run-off-road crashes: an on-scence perspective. Report NHTSA DOT HS 811 500, National Highway Traffic Safery Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 2011
3. Shibahata Y, Shimada K, Tomari T. Improvement of vehicle maneuverability by direct yaw moment control. Veh System Dynamics. 1993 ; 22: 465-481
4. van Zanten A, Erhardt R, Pfaff G, Kost F. Control aspects of the Bosch-VDC. 3rd international symposium on advanced vehicle control ; Aachen, Germany ;. 573.
5. Ghoneim YA, Lin WC, Sidlosky DM, et al. Integrated chassis control system to enhance vehicle stability. Int J Veh Des. 2000 ; 23: 124-144 (Pubitemid 30596435)
6. Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Center fm Stistics and Analysis. Final regulatory impact analysis, FMVSS No. 126, Electronic stability control systems. National Highss ay Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
7. Antonov S Model-based vehicle dynamics control. Aachen: Shaker Verlag ; 2008 :
8. Yamakado M, Takahashi J, Saito S, et al. Improvement in vehicle agility and stability by G-vectoring control. Veh System Dynamics. 2010 ; 48: 231-254
9. Blank M, Margolis DL. Minimizing the path radius of curvature for collision avoidance. Veh System Dynamics. 2000 ; 33 (3). 183-201 (Pubitemid 30584864)
10. Nozad A, Lidberg M, Gordon T, Klomp M. Optimal path recovery from terminal understeer. 22nd IAVSD symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks ; Manchester, UK ;..
11. Gordon TJ, Klomp M, Lidberg M. Strategies for minimizing maximum off-tracking resulting from over-speed in curves. 11th international symposium on advanced vehicle control ; The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, Seoul, Republic of Korea ;..
12. Klomp M. Longitudinal force distribution using quadratically constrained linear programming. Veh System Dynamics. 2011 ; 49 (12). 1823-1836
13. Pacejka HB Tyre and vehicle dynamics. 2 nd edition.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann ; 2006 :
14. Rutquist PE, Edvall MM PROPT - Matlab optimal control software. Pullman, Washington: Tomlab Optimization Inc. ; 2010 :
15. Fahroo F, Ross IM. Trajectory optimization by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method. J Guidance, Control, Dynamics. 2002 ; 25: 160-166 (Pubitemid 34109525)
16. Bryson AE, Ho YC Applied optimal control. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation ; 1975 :