Extrema, accuracy and monotonicity reserving methods for Compressible flow

16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Rider, William J ^a   Greenough, Jeff A ^b   Kamm, James R ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EFFICIENCY GAIN; GODUNOV METHOD; HIGH-RESOLUTION METHODS; MEASURING ERRORS; MONOTONICITY; PIECEWISE LINEAR; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; EFFICIENCY;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 84897688325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Harten, A., High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 49, 193, pp. 357-393.
2. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S., Uniformly High Order Accurate Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes, III, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 1, 1987 pp. 231-303.
3. Huynh, H. T., Accurate Upwind Methods for the Eu-ler Equations, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 32, 199, pp. 1565-1619.
4. Suresh, A. and Huynh, H. T., Accurate Monotonicity-Preserving Schemes with Runge-Kutta Time Stepping, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 136, 199, pp. 3-99.
5. Majda, A. and Osher, S., Propogation of Error into regions of smoothness for accuracte difference approximations to hyperbolic equations, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 30, 1977, pp. 61-70
6. Greenough, J. and Rider, W. J., A Quantitative Comparison of Numerical Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations. Part I: Fifth-order WENO and Piecewise-Linear Godu-nov, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. Submitted for review, 2003, Los Alamos Unlimited Release Report, LA-UR-02-640.
7. Colella, P. and Woodward, P., The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 4, 194, pp 4-201.
8. Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., and Chan, T., Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 11, 1994, pp. 200-212.
9. Jiang, G.-S. and Shu, C.W., Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 126, 1996, pp. 202-228.
10. Marquina, A. and Mulet, P., A flux-split algorithm applied to conservative models for multicomponent compressible flows, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 185, 2002, pp. 120-133
11. Sod, G., A Survey of Several Finite Difference Methods for Systems of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 2, 1978, pp. 1-31.
12. Woodward, P. and Colella, P., The Numerical Simulation of Two-Dimensional Fluid Flow with Strong Shocks, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 4, 194, pp. 115-13.
13. Shu, C.W. and Osher, S., Efficient Implementation of Essentially Non-oscillatory Shock-Capturing Schemes II, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 3, 199, pp. 32-78
14. Rightley, P. M., Vorobieff, P., Martin, R., and Benjamin R. F., Experimental observations of the mixing transition in a shock-accelerated gas curtain Physics of Fluids, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1999, pp. 16-200.
15. Prestridge, K., Vorobieff, P., Rightley, P. M., and Benjamin, R. F., Validation of an instability growth model using particle image velocimetry measurements, Physical Review Letters, Vol 4, No. 19, 2000, pp. 433-4356.
16. Jacobs, J.W., The Dynamics of Shock-Accelerated Light and Heavy Gas-Cylinders, Physics of Fluids: A, Vol., No. 9, 1993, pp. 2239-2247
17. Greenough, J. A., Rider, W. J., Zoldi, C. A., and Kamm, J. R., Code-to-code comparisons for the problem of shock acceleration of a diffuse dense gas cylinder, 2001, Americal Physical Society Division of Fluid Dynamics Annual Meeting, San Diego CA.