Risk-based standards: Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches

Environment Systems and Decisions

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 134-137

  Linkov, Igor ^a   Anklam, Elke ^b   Collier, Zachary A ^a   DiMase, Daniel ^c   Renn, Ortwin ^d  

^a US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)   (United States)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^c Society of Automotive Engineers   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cybersecurity; Nanotechnology; Policy; Resilience; Risk assessment; Risk management; Security

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; PRIVATE SECTOR; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL POLICY; STATE ROLE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84897656644     PISSN: 21945403     EISSN: 21945411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-014-9488-3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aebi U, Anklam E, Baun A, Donaldson K, Fadeel B, Fears R, Gehr P, Kreyling W, Krug H, Kuhlbusch TAJ, Monard D, Riediker M, Stamm H (2011) Joint JRC-EASAC Report impact of engineered nanomaterials on health: Considerations for benefit-risk assessment. EUR 24847 EN.
2. Aven T, Renn O (2009) The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism risk. Risk Anal 29(4): 587-600.
3. Executive Order 13636-Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity (2013) http://www. gpo. gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-19/pdf/2013-03915. pdf.
4. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1: 11-17.
5. Linkov I, Moberg E (2012) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
6. Linkov I, Bates ME, Canis LJ, Seager TP, Keisler JM (2011) A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 784-787.
7. Park J, Seager TP, Rao PSC, Convertino M, Linkov I (2012) Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Anal 33(3): 356-367.
8. Renn O (2008) Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London.
9. U. S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2012) Guide for conducting risk assessments. NIST Special Publication, USA, pp 800-830.
10. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012) A proposed risk management regulator framework. NUREG-2150.