Joint modelling rationale for chained equations

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Hughes, Rachael A ^a   White, Ian R ^b   Seaman, Shaun R ^b   Carpenter, James R ^c,d   Tilling, Kate ^a   Sterne, Jonathan A C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d MRC CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chained equations imputation; Gibbs sampling; Joint modelling imputation; Multiple imputation; Multivariate missing data

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84897646212     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-28     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rubin DB, Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc 1987
2. Schafer JL, Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data London: Chapman & Hall 1997
3. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. van Buuren S, Stat Methods Med Res 2007 16 219 242 10.1177/0962280206074463 17621469
4. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P, Surv Methodol 2001 27 85 95
5. [Conditionally specified distributions: An introduction]: comment. Gelman A, Raghunathan TE, Stat Sci 2001 16 268 269
6. Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL, Statist Med 1999 18 681 694 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<681::AID-SIM71>3.0.CO;2-R
7. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, J Stat Softw 2011 45 1 67
8. School-based alcohol education: Results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Morgenstern M, Wiborg G, Isensee B, Hanewinkel R, Addiction 2009 104 402 412 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02471.x 19207348
9. Injuries of the head, face, and neck in relation to ski helmet use. Mueller B, Cummings P, Rivara F, Brooks M, Terasaki R, Epidemiology 2008 19 270 276 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318163567c 18277163
10. Long-term immunologic response to antiretroviral therapy in low-income countries: A collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Nash D, Katyal M, Brinkhof M, Keiser O, May M, Hughes R, Dabis F, Wood R, Sprinz E, Schechter M, Egger M, AIDS 2008 22 2291 2302 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283121ca9 18981768
11. Multiple imputation of missing genotype data for unrelated individuals. Souverein O, Zwinderman A, Tanck T, Ann Hum Genet 2006 70 372 381 16674559
12. Parity and breastfeeding are protective against breast cancer in nigerian women. Huo D, Adebamowo C, Ogundiran T, Akang E, Campbell O, Adenipekun A, Cummings S, Fackenthal J, Ademuyiwa F, Ahsan H, Olopade O, Br J Cancer 2008 98 992 996 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604275 18301401
13. Physical activity and emotional problems amongst adolescents. Wiles N, Jones G, Haase A, Lawlor D, Macfarlane G, Lewis G, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 2008 43 765 772 10.1007/s00127-008-0362-9
14. Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? Azur M, Stuart E, Frangakis C, Leaf P, Int J Methods Psychiatric Res 2011 20 40 49 10.1002/mpr.329
15. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. White IR, Royston P, Wood A, Stat Med 2011 30 377 399 10.1002/sim.4067 21225900
16. Compatible conditional distributions. Arnold BC, Press SJ, J Am Statist Assoc 1989 84 152 156 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478750
17. Dependency networks for inference, collaborative filtering, and data visualization. Heckerman D, Chickering DM, Meek C, Rounthwaite R, Kadie C, J Mach Learn Res 2000 1 49 75
18. Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. van Buuren S, Brand JPL, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Rubin DB, J Stat Comput Simulat 2006 76 1049 1064 10.1080/10629360600810434
19. On the stationary distribution of iterative imputations. Liu J, Gelman A, Hill J, Su Y, Kropko J, Biometrika 2013 doi: 10.1093/biomet/ast044
20. Little RJA, Rubin DB, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2002
21. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Tanner MA, Wong WH, J Am Statist Assoc 1987 82 528 540 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458
22. Conditionally specified distributions an introduction. Arnold B, Castillo E, Sarabia J, Stat Sci 2001 16 249 265 10.1214/ss/1009213728
23. Kirkwood B, Sterne J, Essential Medical Statistics Hoboken, New Jersey, US: Wiley-Blackwell 2003
24. Albert J, Bayesian computation with R Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer 2009
25. The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Efron B, J Am Statist Assoc 1975 70 892 898 10.1080/01621459.1975. 10480319
26. Cox D, Snell E, Analysis of Binary Data. second edition London, UK: Chapman and Hall 1989
27. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn C, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (Mice V1.0 User's Manual) 2000 http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/publications/MICE\ %20V1.0\%20Manual\%20TNO00038\%202000.pdf
28. Whittaker J, Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc 1990
29. Collapsibility and response variables in contingency tables. Asmussen S, Edwards D, Biometrika 1983 70 567 578 10.1093/biomet/70.3.567
30. Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables. Olkin I, Tate RF, Ann Math Stat 1961 32 448 465 10.1214/aoms/ 1177705052
31. Compatibility of partial or complete conditional probability specifications. Arnold B, Castillo E, Sarabia J, J Stat Plann Inference 2004 123 133 159 10.1016/S0378-3758(03)00137-X
32. Canonical representation of conditionally specified multivariate discrete distributions. Ip E, Wang Y, J Multivariate Anal 2009 100 1282 1290 10.1016/j.jmva.2008.11.010
33. A unified method for checking compatibility and uniqueness for discrete conditional distributions. Tian G, Tan M, Ng K, Tang M, Commun Stat: Theory Methods 2009 38 115 129
34. Compatibility of conditionally specified models. Chen H, Stat Probability Lett 2010 80 670 677 10.1016/j.spl.2009.12.025
35. A simple algorithm for checking compatibility among discrete distributions. Kuo K, Wang Y, Comput Stat Data Anal 2011 55 2457 2462 10.1016/j.csda.2011.02.017
36. Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models. Horton N, Kleinman K, Am Stat 2007 61 79 90 10.1198/000313007X172556 17401454
37. Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data. Yu LM, Burton A, Rivero-Arias O, Stat Methods Med Res 2007 16 243 258 10.1177/0962280206074464 17621470
38. Multiple imputation: current perspectives. Kenward M, Carpenter J, Stat Methods Med Res 2007 16 199 218 10.1177/0962280206075304 17621468