European highly cited scientists' presence in the social web

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 1966-1969

  Mas Bleda, Amalia ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^b   Kousha, Kayvan ^b   Aguillo, Isidro F ^a  

^a Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897635988     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1350-1367.
2. Barjak, F., Li., X. & Thelwall, M. (2007). Which factors explain the web impact of scientists' personal homepages? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 200-211.
3. Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, S., Shema, H. and Terliesner, J. Beyond Citations: Scholars' Visibility on the Social Web. In Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 98-109), Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.
4. Chen, C., Sun, K., Wu, G., Tang, Q., Qin, J., Chiu, K. et al (2009). The impact of internet resources on scholarly communication: a citation analysis. Scientometrics, 81(2), 459-474.
5. Mas-Bleda, A. & Aguillo, I. (in press). Can a personal website be useful as an information source to assess individual scientists? The case of European highly cited researchers. Scientometrics.
6. Mas-Bleda, A. Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. & Aguillo, I. (in press). Successful researchers publicizing research online: an outlink analysis of European highly cited scientists' personal websites. Journal of Documentation.
7. Nicholas, D. & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services & Use, 31, 61-83.
8. Pitzek, S. (2002). Impact of onlineavailability of science literature. Retrieved March 7, 2013 from: http://www. vmars. tuwien. ac. at/cours es/proseminar/doc/paperserver. pdf.
9. Ponte, D. & Simon, J. (2011). Scholarly communication 2. 0: Exploring researchers' opinions on Web 2. 0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials Review, 37(3), 149-156.
10. Procter, R., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A. & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010). Adoption and use of Web 2. 0 in scholarly communications. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A, 368(1926), 4039-4056.