An interface redesign for the feed-water system of the advanced boiling water reactor in a nuclear power plant in Taiwan

Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 720-729

  Hsieh, Min Chih ^a   Chiu, Ming Chuan ^a   Hwang, Sheue Ling ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

ecological interface design; human computer interface; interface design; nuclear power plant

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED BOILING WATER REACTORS; COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN; EMERGENCY CONDITIONS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERFACES; INTERFACE DESIGNS; LEVELS OF AUTOMATION; OPERATOR PERFORMANCE;

BOILERS; BOILING WATER REACTORS; ECOLOGY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NASA; WATER; WATERWORKS;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 84897634566     PISSN: 00223131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2014.889584     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chuang CF., Chou HP. Design development and implementation of the human-system interface for Lungmen nuclear project. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008; 55 (5): 2654-2661.
2. OHara J., Higgins J., Kramer J. Advanced information systems: technical basis and human factors review guidance. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2000. (. Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-6633).
3. Ujita H. Human error classification and analysis in nuclear power plants. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1985; 22 (6): 496-498.
4. Hwang SL., Liang SF., Yeh Liu TY., Yang YJ., Chen PY., Chuang CF. Evaluation of human factors in interface design in main control room. Nucl Eng Des. 2009; 239 (12): 3069-3075.
5. Jou YT., Yenn TC., Lin CJ., Yang CW., Chiang CC. Evaluation of operators mental workload of human-system interface automation in the advanced nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Des. 2009; 239 (11): 2537-2543.
6. Ponsa P., Vilanova R., Amante B. Human intervention and interface design in automation system. Int J Comput Commun. 2011; 6 (1): 166-174.
7. Kirwan B. Incident reduction and risk migration. Safety Sci. 2011; 49: 11-20.
8. Rogers ML., Sockolow PS., Bowles KH., Hand KE., George J. Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care. Int J Med Inform. 2013; 82 (11): 1068-1074.
9. Kitamura M., Fujita Y., Yoshikawa H. Review of international standards related to the design for control rooms on nuclear power plant. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2005; 42 (4): 406-417.
10. Carvalho PVR., dos Santos IL., Gomes JO., Borges MRS., Guerlain S. Human factors approach for evaluation and redesign of human-system interfaces of a nuclear power plant simulator. Display. 2008; 29 (3): 273-284.
11. OHara J., Brown WS., Lewis PM., Persensky JJ. Human-system interface design review guidelines. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2002. (. Tech. Rep. NUREG-0700 Rev. 2).
12. OHara JM., Higgins JC., Persensky JJ., Lewis PM., Bongarra JP. Human factors engineering program review model. Washington (DC): U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2004. (. Tech. Rep. NUREG-0711 Rev. 2).
13. Burns CM., Hajdukiewicz JR. Ecological interface design. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2004; p. 47-82.
14. Lau N., Jamieson GA., Skranning G Jr., Burns CM. Ecological interface design in the nuclear domain: an empirical evaluation of ecological displays for the secondary subsystems of a boiling water reactor plant simulator. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008; 55 (6): 3597-3610.
15. Vicente KJ., Rasmussen J. Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybernetics. 1992; 22 (4): 1-18.
16. St-Cyr O., Jamieson GA., Vicente KJ. Ecological interface design and sensor noise. Int J Human-Computer Studies. 2013; 71 (11): 1056-1068.
17. Young MS., Birrell SA. Ecological IVIS design: using EID to develop a novel in vehicle information system. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2012; 13 (2): 225-239.
18. Pawlak WS., Vicente KJ. Inducing effective operator control through ecological interface design. Int J Human-Computer Studies. 1996; 44 (5): 653-688.
19. Vicente KJ. Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Human Factors. 2002; 44 (1): 62-78.
20. Burns C., Jamieson G., Skraaning G., Lau N., Kwok J. Supporting Situation Awareness Through Ecological Interface Design. Proceeding of the human factors and ergonomics society 51st annual meeting; 2007 Oct 1-5; Maryland, USA.
21. Welch R., Braseth AO., Nihlwing C., Skraaning A Jr., Teigen A., Veland O., Lau N., Jamieson GA., Burns CM., Kwok J. The 2005 Ecological Interface Design Process and the Resulting Displays. Norway: OECD Halden Reactor Project. 2007. HWR-847. Available from: http://gypsy.mie.utoronto.ca/publications/files/ tech-reports/CEL07-01.pdf.
22. Kim SK., Suh SM., Jang GS., Hong SK., Park JC. Empirical research on an ecological interface design for improving situation awareness of operators in an advanced control room. Nucl Eng Des. 2012; 235: 226-237.
23. Boy GA., Schmitt KA. Design for safety: a cognitive engineering approach to the control and management of nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 2013; 52: 125-136.
24. Christoffersen K., Hunter CN., Vicente KJ. A longitudinal study of the effects of ecological interface design on fault management performance. Int J Cognit Ergonom. 1997; 1: 1-24.
25. Christoffersen K., Hunter CN., Vicente KJ. A longitudinal study of the effects of ecological interface design on deep knowledge. Int J Human-Computer Studies. 1998; 48 (6): 729-762.
26. Jamieson GA. Ecological interface design for petrochemical process control: an empirical assessment. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybernetics A. 2007; 37 (6): 906-920.
27. Jamieson GA., Miller CA., Ho WH., Vicente KJ. Integrating task- and work domain-based work analyses in ecological interface design: a process control case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cybernetics A. 2007; 37 (6): 887-905.
28. Lau N., Veland O., Kwok J., Jamieson GA., Burns CM., Braseth AO., Welch R. Ecological interface design in the Nuclear Domain: an application the secondary subsystems of a boiling water reactor plant simulator. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2008; 55 (6): 3579-3596.
29. Endsley MR., Selcon SJ., Hardiman TD., Croft DG. A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. Proc Human Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1998; 42 (1): 82-86.
30. Endsley MR. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference; 1988 May 23-27; Dayton, OH.
31. Wickens CD., Hollands JG. Engineering psychology and human performance. Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 2000.
32. Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2012.
33. Wickens CD. Processing resources and attention. London: Taylor & Francis; 1991.
34. Loftus GR., Mackworth NH. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. J Exp Psychol Human. 1978; 4 (4): 565-572.
35. Henderson JM., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999; 50: 243-271.