Naturally emerging decision criteria in product concept evaluation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED

Volumn 7 DS75-07, Issue , 2013, Pages 257-266

  Nikander, Jan B ^a   Liikkanen, Lassi A ^a   Laakso, Miko ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Concept evaluation; Decision making; Early design phases; Human behaviour in design

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT EVALUATION; DECISION CRITERIONS; EARLY DESIGN PHASIS; HUMAN BEHAVIOUR IN DESIGNS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT CONCEPT EVALUATIONS; PROFESSIONAL DESIGNERS; VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

DESIGN;

EID: 84897627382     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Akay D., Kulak O. and Henson B., (2011). Conceptual Design Evaluation Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Information Axiom. Computers in Industry, 62, 138-146.
2. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76, August, 77-87.
4. Asiedu, Y. and Gu, P. (1998). Product Life Cycle Cost Analysis: State of the Art Review. International Journal of Production Research, 36(4), 883-908.
5. Atman, C.J. and Bursic, K.M. (1998). Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 121-132.
6. Beggan, J.K. (1992). On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229-237.
7. Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
8. Ditto, P.H. and Lopez, D.F. (1992). Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568-584.
9. Design Council (2006). Double Diamond Design Process. Available from: http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/webdav/harmonise?Page/@id.53&Session/@id. D-4jaHtwk0Hj7ve5elIToe&Document/@id.10149
10. Holm, I. (2006). Ideas and beliefs in architecture and industrial design: How attitudes, orientations, and underlying assumptions shape the built environment. Oslo School of Architecture and Design. PhD thesis.
11. Hsee, C.K., Loewenstein, G.F., Blount, B. and Bazerman, M.H. (1999). Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576-590.
12. Ericsson, K.A. and Simon H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Kihlander, I. (2011). Managing Concept Decision Making in Product Development Practice. KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Machine Design. Doctoral thesis.
14. Koen, P.A., Ajamian, G.M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., Johnson, A., Puri, P. and Seibert, R. (2002). Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools, and Techniques. In. Belliveau, P., Griffin, A. and Somermeyer, S. (Eds.): PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 5-35.
15. Laakso, M. and Liikkanen, L.A. (2012) Dubious Role of Formal Creativity Techniques in Professional Design. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity ICDC2012, Sep 18-20, Glasgow, UK.
16. López-Mesa, B. and Bylund, N. (2011). A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company. Research in Engineering Design, 22, 7-27.
17. Mattson, C.A. and Messac, A. (2005). Pareto Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, With Visualization. Optimization and Engineering, 6(1), 85-115.
18. Mattson, C.A., Muller, A.A. and Messac, A. (2009). Case Studies in Concept Exploration and Selection With s-Pareto Frontiers. International Journal of Product Development, Special Issue on Space Expoloration and Design Optimization, 9(1-3), 32-59.
19. Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., & Grote K. H. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Berlin: Springer.
20. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J. R., Coupey, E. and Johnson, E. J. (1992). A Constructive Process View of Decision Making: Multiple Strategies in Judgement and Choice. Acta Psychologica, 80, 107-141.
21. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a Theory of Psycholgical Ownership in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.
22. Pugh, S. 1991. Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Workingham, Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.
23. Rittel, H.W. J. and Webber, M.M. (1984) Planning Problems Are Wicked Problems. Cross, N. (ed) Developments in design methodology (pp. 135-144). New York, NY: John Wiley & sons.
24. Rosenman, M. A. (1993). Qualitative Evaluation for Topological Specification in Conceptual Design. Applications and Techniques of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 2, 311-326.
25. Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. New york: Basic Books.
26. Stanovich, K.E. (2006). How to think straight about psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
27. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2003). Product Design and Development, Third Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
28. Vinodh, S. and Girubha R.J. (2011). Sustainable concept selection using ELECTRE. Clean Technologies and Enviromental Policy, 14(4), 1-6.
29. Yang, M. (2010). Consensus and Single Leader Decision Making in Teams Using Structured Design Methods. Design Studies, 31(4), 345-362. tional section. Please remember that this document should not exceed 9 pages.