The medium is the metamessage: Conversational style in new media interaction

Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 99-118

  Tannen, Deborah ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897606922     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Baron, Naomi. 2004. See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23, no. 4:397–423.
2. Bateson, Gregory. 1972. A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an ecology of mind, 177–93. New York: Ballantine.
3. Bright, William. 1982. Literature: Written and oral. In Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, ed. Deborah Tannen, 271–83. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, ed. Deborah Tannen, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Crystal, David. 2008. Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Eisenstein, Elizabeth. 2011. Divine art, infernal machine: The reception of printing in the West from first impressions to the sense of an ending. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Gershon, Ilana. 2010. The breakup 2.0: Disconnecting over new media. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Herring, Susan C. 1995. Men’s language on the internet. Nordlyd 23:1–20.
10. Herring, Susan C. 2003. Gender and power in on-line communication. In The handbook of language and gender, eds. Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 202–28. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11. Herring, Susan C. 2010. Computer-mediated conversation: Introduction and overview. Language@Internet 7, article 2. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2801.
12. Herring, Susan C., and Asta Zelenkauskaite. 2009. Symbolic capital in a virtual heterosexual market: Abbreviations and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. Written Communication 26, no. 1:5–31.
13. Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness, or minding your p’s and q’s. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, eds. Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 292–305. Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Linguistics.
14. Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
15. Shapira, Ian. 2010. Texting generation doesn’t share boomers’ taste for talk. Washington Post, August 8. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/07/AR2010080702848.html.
16. Tannen, Deborah. 1982a. Introduction. In Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, ed. Deborah Tannen, ix–xii. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
17. Tannen, Deborah. 1982b. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58, no. 1:1–21.
18. Tannen, Deborah. 1986. That’s not what I meant!: How conversational style makes or breaks your relations with others. New York: William Morrow.
19. Tannen, Deborah. 2005. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Rev. ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Thurlow, Crispin. 2006. From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, no. 3, article 1.
21. Waseleski, Carol. 2006. Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 11, no. 4, article 6.