Technological arbitrage opportunities and interindustry differences in entry rates

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 437-452

  Anokhin, Sergey ^a,b   Wincent, Joakim ^c,d,e  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VORONEZH STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VAASA   (Finland)

^e HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Appropriability regime; Arbitrage opportunity; Start up rates

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897592829     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Acs Z., Audretsch D., Braunerhjelm P., Carlsson B. The missing link: the knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. CEPR Discussion Paper # 4783 2004.
2. Acs Z., Braunerhjelm P., Audretsch D., Carlsson B. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 2009, 32:15-30.
3. Alvarez S.A., Barney J.B. Organizing rent generation and appropriation: toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19:621-635.
4. Amit R., Muller E., Cockburn I. Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing 1995, 10:95-106.
5. Anokhin S. Venture migration: a quest for a low-hanging fruit?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 2013, 25:423-445.
6. Anokhin S., Schulze W. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing 2009, 24:465-476.
7. Anokhin S., Wincent J. Start-up rates and innovation: a cross-country examination. Journal of International Business Studies 2012, 43:41-60.
8. Anokhin S., Troutt M., Wincent J., Brandyberry A. Measuring arbitrage opportunities: a minimum performance inefficiency estimation technique. Organizational Research Methods 2010, 13:55-66.
9. Anokhin S., Troutt M., Wincent J. Measuring arbitrage opportunities across industries with frontier-based estimates of efficiency: methodological implications for time series data. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association conference, St. Pete's Beach, FL, October 2010 2010.
10. Anokhin S., Wincent J., Autio E. Operationalizing opportunities in entrepreneurship research: use of data envelopment analysis. Small Business Economics 2011, 37:39-57.
11. Anokhin S., Wincent J., Frishammar J. A conceptual framework for misfit technology commercialization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78:1060-1071.
12. Anyadike-Danes M., Hart M., O'Reilly M. Watch that space! The county hierarchy in firm births and deaths in the U.K., 1980-1999. Small Business Economics 2005, 25:273-292.
13. Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Invention Activity 1962, 609-626. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
14. Audretsch D. Innovation and Industry Evolution 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge.
15. Audretsch D., Keilbach M. The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 44:1242-1254.
16. Audretsch D., Keilbach M. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and economic growth. Paper presented at the AEA annual meeting 2008, (Retrieved on 7/12/2012 at http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2008/2008_192.pdf).
17. Audretsch D., Keilbach M., Lehmann E. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth 2006, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.
18. Audretsch D., Litan R., Strom R. Entrepreneurship and Openness: Theory and Evidence 2009, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., Northampton, MA.
19. Baltagi B., Wu P. Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Economic Theory 1999, 15:814-823.
20. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17(1):99-120.
21. Baron R.A. The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review 2008, 33:328-340.
22. Bator F. The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1958, 72:351-379.
23. Beck N., Katz J.N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 1995, 89:634-647.
24. Bhide A. The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Bosma N., Stam E., Schutjens V. Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries. Small Business Economics 2011, 36:401-418.
26. Bradley M., Brav A., Goldstein I., Jiang W. Activist arbitrage: a study of open-ending attempts of closed-end funds. Journal of Financial Economics 2010, 95:1-19.
27. Chang E., Chrisman J., Kellermanns F. The relationship between prior and subsequent new venture creation in the United States: a county level analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 2011, 26:200-211.
28. Choi Y.R., Lévesque M., Shepherd D.A. When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation. Journal of Business Venturing 2008, 23:333-355.
29. Chuang Y., Lin C. Foreign direct investment, R&D and spillover efficiency: evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Studies 1999, 35:117-137.
30. Cohen W., Levin R. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam: North Holland 1989, R. Schmalensee, R. Willing (Eds.).
31. Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:128-152.
32. Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER working paper # 7552 2000.
33. Daraio C., Simar L. Advanced Robust and Nonparametrical Methods in Efficiency Analysis-Methodology and Applications 2007, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
34. Davidsson P. The domain of entrepreneurship research: some suggestions. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth 2003, 6:315-372. Emerald Group Publishing. J.E. Katz, D.A. Shepherd (Eds.).
35. Dean T., Meyer G. Industry environments and new venture formations in U.S. manufacturing: a conceptual and empirical analysis of demand determinants. Journal of Business Venturing 1996, 11:107-132.
36. Delmas M., Tokat Y. Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector. Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26:441-460.
37. Dimov D. Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2007, 5:713-731.
38. Dosi G., Marengo L., Pasquali C. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: on the relations between appropriability, opportunities, and rates of innovation. Research Policy 2006, 35:1110-1121.
39. Driscoll J., Kraay A.C. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80:549-560.
40. Durand R., Vargas V. Ownership, organization, and private firms' efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24:667-675.
41. Eckhardt J.T., Shane S.A. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 2003, 29:333-349.
42. Eddleston K., Kellermanns F., Sarathy R. Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning, and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies 2008, 45:26-50.
43. Evans L., Siegfried J. Empirical studies of entry and exit: a survey of the evidence. Review of Industrial Organization 1994, 9:121-156.
44. Index Numbers: Essays in Honor of Sten Malmquist 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, R.R. Russell (Eds.).
45. Ferguson C. From the people who brought you voodoo economics. Harvard Business Review 1988, 66:55-62.
46. Fritsch M., Falck O. New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies 2007, 41:1-16.
47. Gaglio C.M. The role of mental simulations and counterfactual thinking in the opportunity identification process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28:533-552.
48. Gagnon L., Karolyi A. Multi-market trading and arbitrage. Journal of Financial Economics 2010, 97:53-80.
49. Gartner W. "Who is an entrepreneur?" is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1989, 13:47-68.
50. Geroski P. What do we know about entry?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 1995, 13:421-440.
51. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2000, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
52. Griliches Z. R&D, Patents, and Productivity 1984, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
53. Hayek F. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 1945, 35:519-530.
54. Hitt M., Ireland D., Camp M., Sexton D. Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:479-491.
55. Hoechle D. Robust standard errors for panel regression with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal 2007, 7:281-312.
56. Hoff A. Second stage DEA: comparison of approaches for modeling the DEA score. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 181:425-435.
57. Kao J. Tapping the world's innovation hotspots. Harvard Business Review 2009, 87:109-114.
58. Katila R., Mang P. Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research Policy 2003, 32:317-332.
59. Kirzner I. Competition and Entrepreneurship 1973, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
60. Kirzner I. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature 1997, 35:60-85.
61. Kirzner I. The alert and creative entrepreneur: a clarification. Small Business Economics 2009, 32:145-152.
62. Klevorick A., Levin R., Nelson R., Winter S. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 1995, 24:185-205.
63. Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit 1921, Augustus Kelley, New York.
64. Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987, 3:783-820.
65. Lipschitz L., Lane T., Mourmouras A. Capital flows to transition economies: master or servant?. International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/02/11 2002.
66. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 1997, 6:83-117.
67. Markman G., Phan P., Balkin D., Gianiodis P. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20:241-263.
68. Marquardt D. You should standardize the predictor variables in your regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1980, 75:87-91.
69. McDonald J. Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 197:792-798.
70. Minniti M., Lévesque M. Entrepreneurial types and economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing 2010, 25:305-314.
71. Mitchell M., Pulvino T., Stafford E. Limited arbitrage in equity markets. Journal of Finance 2002, 57:551-584.
72. Moules J. The Rebel Entrepreneur: Rewriting the Business Rulebook 2012, Kogan Page, London.
73. Mueller D. The persistence of profits above the norm. Economica 1977, 44:369-380.
74. Papke L., Wooldridge J. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1996, 11(6):619-632.
75. Posen H., Lee J., Yi S. The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management Journal 2013, 34:149-164.
76. Rivkin J. Reproducing knowledge: replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science 2001, 12:274-293.
77. Schnaars S.P. Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers 1994, Free Press, New York.
78. Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of Economic Development 1934, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
79. Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 1942, Harper and Brothers, New York.
80. Shackle G. Foreword. The Entrepreneur: Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques 1982, Praeger Publishers, New York. R.F. Hebert, A. Link (Eds.).
81. Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 2000, 11(4):448-469.
82. Shane S. Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science 2001, 47:1173-1190.
83. Shane S. Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics 2009, 33:141-149.
84. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25:217-226.
85. Shleifer A., Vishny R. The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance 1997, 52:35-55.
86. Stevenson H., Jarillo C. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal 1990, 11:17-27.
87. Stiglitz J. Markets, market failures and development. American Economic Review 1989, 79:197-203.
88. Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 1986, 15:285-305.
89. Teece D. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 1998, 40:55-79.
90. Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science 2002, 48:90-104.
91. Tulkens H., Eeckaut P.V. Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: methodological aspects. European Journal of Operational Research 1995, 80:474-499.
92. Utterback J.M. Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science 1974, 183:658-662.
93. Williamson O. The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations. American Economic Review 1971, 61:112-123.
94. Zahra S. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing 1993, 8:319-340.
95. Zahra S. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal 1996, 39:1713-1735.
96. Zahra S., Bogner W. Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15:135-173.