Uncertainty of soil reflectance retrieval from SPOT and rapideyemultispectral satellite images using a per-pixel bootstrappedempirical line atmospheric correction over an agricultural region

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 217-234

  Vaudour, E ^a,b   Gilliot, J M ^a,b   Bel, L ^c   Brechet L ^a,b   Hamiache, J ^c   Hadjar, D ^a,b   Lemonnier, Y ^a,b  

^a UMR 1402 ECOSYS   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c AgroParisTech   (France)

Author keywords

ATCOR2; Atmospheric correction accuracy; Per pixel empirical line; RapidEye; Soil reflectance; SPOT

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL LAND; ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PIXEL; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL SURFACE; SPOT; TOPSOIL;

EID: 84897586324     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, K., Milton, E.J., 2006. On the temporal stability of ground calibrationtargets: implications for the reproducibility of remote sensing methodologies.International Journal of Remote Sensing 27 (15-16), 3365-3374.
2. Atkinson, P.M., Sargent, I.M., Foody, G.M., Williams, J., 2007. Exploring thegeostatistical method for estimating the signal-to-noise ratio of images. Pho-togrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 73 (7), 841-850.
3. Baugh, W.M., Groeneveld, D.P., 2008. Empirical proof of the empirical line. Interna-tional Journal of Remote Sensing 29 (3), 665-672.
4. Bellon-Maurel, V., McBratney, A., 2011. Near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR)spectroscopic techniques for assessing the amount of carbon stock in soils.Critical review and research perspectives. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 43,1348-1420.
5. Ben-Dor, E., 2002. Quantitative remote sensing of soil properties. Advances in Agron-omy 75, 173-243.
6. Ben-Dor, E., Chabrillat, S., Demattê, J.A.M., Taylor, G.R., Hill, J., Whiting, M.L., Sommer,S., 2009. Using imaging spectroscopy to study soil properties. Remote Sensingof Environment 113, S38-S55.
7. Ben-Dor, E., Kindel, B., Goetz, A.F.H., 2004. Quality assessment of several methods torecover surface reflectance using synthetic imaging spectroscopy data. RemoteSensing of Environment 90, 389-404.
8. Berck, A., Bernstein, L.S., Acharya, P.K., Robertson, D.C., Chetwynd, J.H., Adler-Golden,S.M., 1998. MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with applicationto AVIRIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 65, 367-375.
9. Biggar, S.F., Slater, P.N., Gellman, D.I., 1994. Uncertainties in the in-flight calibrationof sensors with reference to measured ground sites in the 0.4-1.1 μm range.Remote Sensing of Environment 48, 245-252.
10. Chang, C.W., Laird, D.A., Mausbach, M.J., Hurburgh, C.R., 2001. Near infraredreflectance spectroscopy: principal components regression analysis of soil prop-erties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 480-490.
11. Chavez, P.S., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections revisited and improved.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62, 1025-1036.
12. Clark, B., Suomalainen, J., Pellikka, P., 2011. The selection of appropriate spectrallybright pseudo-invariant ground targets for use in empirical line calibration ofSPOT satellite imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66, 429-445.
13. Clark, R.N., Swayze, G.A., Livo, K.E., Kokaly, R.F., King, T.V.V., Dalton, J.B., Vance, J.S.,Rockwell, B.W., Hoefen, T., McDougal, R.R., 2002. Surface Reflectance Calibrationof Terrestrial Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Tutorial Using AVIRIS, online source:http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov/PAPERS.calibration.tutorial
14. Crahet, M., 1992. Soil Map of the Versailles Plain. Scale 1:50 000. Institut NationalAgronomique Paris-Grignon, Grignon, Internal report.
15. Croft, H., Anderson, K., Kuhn, N.J., 2009. Characterizing soil surface roughness usinga combined structural and spectral approach. European Journal of Soil Science60, 431-442.
16. De Vries, C., Danaher, T., Denham, R., Scarth, P., Phinn, S., 2007. An operational radio-metric calibration procedure for the Landsat sensors based on pseudo-invarianttarget sites. Remote Sensing of Environment 107, 414-429.
17. Dinguirard, M., Slater, P.N., 1999. Calibration of space-multispectral imaging sen-sors: a review. Remote Sensing of Environment 68, 194-205.
18. Escadafal, R., 1993. Remote sensing of soil color: principles and applications. RemoteSensing Reviews 7, 261-279.
19. Farrand, W.H., Singer, R.B., Merényi, E., 1994. Retrieval of apparent surfacereflectance from AVIRIS data: a comparison of empirical line, radiative trans-fer and spectral mixture methods. Remote Sensing of Environment 47,311-321.
20. Ferrier, G., 1995. Evaluation of apparent surface reflectance estimation methodolo-gies. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16, 2291-2297.
21. Gao, B.C., Heidebrecht, K.B., Goetz, A.F.H., 1993. Derivation of scaled sur-face reflectances from AVIRIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 44,165-178.
22. Gilliot, J.M., Michelin, J., Vaudour, E., 2012. Une chaîne de traitement automatiquepour l'estimation de la rugosité des sols agricoles par photogrammétrie 3D àpartir de photographies prises sans contraintes pour le suivi radiométrique dessols. Colloque des 11èmes Journées d'étude des sols, INRA Versailles, 244-245[in French].
23. Hadjimitsis, D.G., Clayton, C.R.I., Hope, V.S., 2004. An assessment of the effec-tiveness of atmospheric correction algorithms through the remote sensingof some reservoirs. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (18),3651-3674.
24. Hagolle, O., Dedieu, G., Mougenot, B., Debaecker, V., Duchemin, B., Meygret, A., 2008.Correction of aerosol effects on multi-temporal images acquired with constantviewing angles: application to Formosat-2 images. Remote Sensing of Environ-ment 112, 1689-1701.
25. Hamm, N.A.S., Atkinson, P.M., Milton, E.J., 2012. A per-pixel, non-stationary mixedmodel for empirical line atmospheric correction in remote sensing. RemoteSensing of Environment 124, 666-678.
26. Hesterberg, T., Monaghan, S., Moore, D., Clipson, A., 2003. Bootstrap methods andpermutation tests. In: Companion Chapter 18 to The Practice of Business Statis-tics. Freeman and Company, New York, pp. 74.
27. Jacquemoud, S., Baret, F., Hanocq, J.F., 1992. Modeling spectral and bidirectional soilreflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 41, 123-132.
28. Karpouzli, E., Malthus, T., 2003. The empirical line method for the atmosphericcorrection of IKONOS imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24 (5),1143-1150.
29. Mather, P., Koch, M., 2011. Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images. JohnWiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, Great Britain, pp. 460.
30. Moran, M.S., Bryant, R., Thome, K., Ni, W., Nouvellon, Y., Gonzalez-Dugo, M.P., Qi,J., Clarke, T.R., 2001. A refined empirical line approach for reflectance factorretrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environ-ment 78, 71-82.
31. Moran, M.S., Jackson, R.D., Hart, G.F., Slater, P.N., Bartell, R.J., Biggar, S.F., Gellman,D.I., Santer, R.P., 1990. Obtaining surface reflectance factors from atmosphericand view angle corrected SPOT-1 HRV data. Remote Sensing of Environment 32,203-214.
32. Moran, M.S., Jackson, R.D., Slater, P.N., Teillet, P.M., 1992. Evaluation of simplifiedprocedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensoroutput. Remote Sensing of Environment 41, 169-184.
33. Popp, R.A.T., 1995. Correcting atmospheric masking to retrieve the spectral albedoof land surfaces from satellite measurements. International Journal of RemoteSensing 16 (18), 3483-3508.
34. Rahman, H., Dedieu, G., 1994. SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric cor-rection of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum. International Journal ofRemote Sensing 15 (1), 123-143.
35. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for StatisticalComputing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/
36. Richter, R., Schläpfer, D., 2002. Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imagingspectrometry data. Part 2: atmospheric/topographic correction. InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing 23, 2631-2649.
37. Richter, R., Schläpfer, D., 2012. ATCOR-2/3 User Guide, Version 8.2.0., pp. 223.
38. Santer, R., Gu, F., Guyot, G., Deuzé, J.L., Devaux, C., Vermote, E., Verbrugghe, M., 1992.SPOT calibration at the La Crau test site (France). Remote Sensing of Environment41, 227-237.
39. Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M.E., Painter, T.H., Dangel, S., Martonchik, J.V. 2006. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and casestudies. Remote Sensing of Environment 103, 27-42.
40. Schott, J.R., 1997. Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach. Oxford UniversityPress, USA, New York, pp. 184.
41. Smith, G.M., Curran, P.J., 1999. Methods for estimating image signal-to-noise ratio(SNR). In: Atkinson, P.M., Tate, N.J. (Eds.), Advances in Remote Sensing and GISAnalysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, pp. 61-74.
42. Smith, G.M., Milton, E.J., 1999. The use of the empirical line method to calibrateremotely sensed data to reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20(13), 2653-2662.
43. Switzer, P., Kowalik, W.S., Lyon, R.J.P., 1981. Estimation of atmospheric path-radiance by the covariance matrix method. Photogrammetric Engineering andRemote Sensing 47, 1469-1476.
44. Tanré, D., Deroo, C., Duhaut, P., Herman, M., Morcette, J.J., Perbos, J., Deschamps, P.Y. 1990. Description of a computer code to simulate the satellite signal in the solarspectrum: 5S. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11, 659-668.
45. Thome, K.J., 2001. Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat7 ETM+ using thereflectance-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment 78, 27-38.
46. Vaudour, E., Gilliot, J.M., Bel, L., De Junet, A., Michelin, J., Hadjar, D., Cambier, P., Houot,S., Coquet, Y., 2012. Performance degradation in predicting topsoil organic car-bon contents using reflectance spectra from lab, field to SPOT scales over aperiurban region. EGU 2012, Vienna (Austria), 1 p.
47. Vaudour, E., Moeys, J., Gilliot, J.M., Coquet, Y., 2008. Spatial retrieval of soil reflectancefrom SPOT multispectral data using the empirical line method. InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing 29 (19), 5571-5584.
48. Vermote, E., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J.L., Herman, M., Morcrette, J.J., 1997. Second sim-ulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: an overview. IEEETransactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35 (3), 675-686.
49. Viscarra Rossel, R.A., Walvoort, D.J.J., Mc Bratney, A.B., Janik, L.J., Skjemstad, J.O. 2006. Visible near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spec-troscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma 131,59-75.
50. World Reference Base (WRB), 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. AFramework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 128.