Economic benefits from promoting linseed in the diet of dairy cows for reducing methane emissions and improving milk quality

Food Policy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 140-149

  Marette, Stéphan ^a   Millet, Guy ^a  

^a INRA ALISS   (France)

Author keywords

Experiment; Milk; Quality; Regulation

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; CROP PLANT; DAIRY FARMING; DIET; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION; METHANE; MILK PRODUCTION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

FRANCE;

EID: 84897567797     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aldy J.E., Krupnick A.J., Newell R.G., Parry I.W.H., Pizer W.A. Designing climate mitigation policy. J. Econ. Lit. 2010, 48(4):903-934.
2. Ariely D., Lowenstein G., Prelec D. Coherent arbitrariness: stable demand curves without stable preferences. Q. J. Econ. 2003, 118(1):73-105.
3. Becker G.M., DeGroot M.H., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 1964, 9(3):226-232.
4. Blanc Bleu Coeur Association, 2012. , Paris, France. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/bleu_blanc_coeur.pdf.
5. Chan K.Y., Heenan D.P. The influence of crop rotation on soil structure and soil physical properties under conventional tillage. Soil Till. Res. 1996, 37:113-125.
6. Chang J.B., Lusk J.L., Norwood F.B. How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict field behavior?. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2009, 91:518-534.
7. Dennis C. Vaccine targets gut reaction to calm livestock wind. Nature 2004, 429:119.
8. Disdier A.C., Marette S. Taxes, minimum-quality standards and/or product labeling to improve environmental quality and welfare: experiments can provide answers. J. Regul. Econ. 2012, 41:337-357.
9. Disdier A.C., Marette S., Millet G. Are consumers concerned about palm oil? Evidence from a lab experiment?. Food Policy 2013, 43:180-189.
10. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization, 2012. Global impact domain: methane emissions. http://www.fao.org/WAIRDOCS/LEAD/X6116E/X6116E00.HTM.
11. Glasser F., Ferlay A., Chilliard Y. Oilseed lipid supplements and fatty acid composition of cow milk: a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4687-4703.
12. Hasson R., Löfgren A., Visser M. Climate change in a public goods game: investment decision in mitigation versus adaptation. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70(2):331-338.
13. Lentschner, K., 2012. Candia se bat pour sa survie (Candia struggles for its survival). Le Figaro, Web edition, November 27 2012.
14. Lusk J.L., Marette S. Welfare effects of food labels and bans with alternative willingness to pay measures. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2010, 32:319-337.
15. Lusk J.L., House L.O., Valli C., Jaeger S.R., Moore M., Morrow B., Traill W.B. Consumer welfare effects of introducing and labeling genetically modified food. Econ. Lett. 2005, 88:382-388.
16. Lusk J.L., Pruitt J.R., Norwood B. External validity of a framed field experiment. Econ. Lett. 2006, 93:285-290.
17. Marette S. Consumer confusion and multiple equilibria. Econ. Bull. 2010, 30:1120-1128.
18. Marette S. The strategy of one firm offering a new product with willingness to pay elicited in the lab. Agribusiness 2013, 29:361-376.
19. Marette S., Roosen J., Blanchemanche S. Taxes and subsidies to change eating habits when information is not enough: an application to fish consumption. J. Regul. Econ. 2008, 34:119-143.
20. Marette S., Roosen J., Blanchemanche S. The combination of lab and field experiments for benefit-cost analysis. J. Benefit-Cost Anal. 2011, 2(3):1-35.
21. Marette S., Messéan A., Millet G. Consumers' willingness to pay for eco-friendly apples under different labels: evidences from a lab experiment. Food Policy 2012, 37:151-161.
22. Martin C., Rouel J., Jouany J.P., Doreau M., Chilliard Y. Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2642-2650.
23. Nguyen T.T.H., van der Werf H.M.G., Eugène M., Veysset P., Devun J., Chesneau G., Doreau M. Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems. Livestock Sci. 2012, 145(1):239-251.
24. Roosen J., Marette S. Making the 'right' choice based on experiments: regulatory decisions for food and health. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2011, 38(3):361-381.
25. Rousu M.C., Huffman W.E., Shogren J.F., Tegene A. Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food. Econ. Inq. 2007, 45(3):409-432.
26. Verger P., Khalfi N., Roy C., Blanchemanche S., Marette S., Roosen J. Balancing the risk of dioxins and PCBs and the benefit of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids of the n-3 variety for French fish consumers in western coastal area. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25(6):765-771.
27. Wansink B., Sonka S., Hasler C. Front-label health claims: when less is more. Food Policy 2004, 29:659-667.