Allometry of phloem thickness and resin flow and their relation to tree chemotype in a southwestern ponderosa pine forest

Forest Science

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 270-274

  Davis, Thomas S ^a   Hofstetter, Richard W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conifer; Oleoresin; Terpenoids; Tree traits; Vascular tissue

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESINS;

CONIFER; OLEORESIN; TERPENOIDS; TREE TRAITS; VASCULAR TISSUE;

FORESTRY;

BIOLOGY; EQUATIONS; FORESTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SYNTHETIC POLYMERS;

EID: 84897553980     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.12-155     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, C.D., M. Savage, D.A. Falk, K.F. Suckling, T.W. Swetnam, T. Schulke, P.B. Stacey, P. Morgan, M. Hoffman, and J.T. Klingel. 2002. Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: A broad perspective. Ecol. Appl. 12:1418-1433.
2. Amman, G.D. 1972. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relation to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. J. Econ. Entomol. 65:138-140.
3. Crafts, A.S. 1932. Phloem anatomy, exudation, and transport of organic nutrients in curcubits. Plant Physiol. 7:183-225.
4. Cooper, C.F. 1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern ponderosa pine forests since white settlement. Ecol. Monogr. 30:129-164.
5. Coulson, R.N. 1979. Population dynamics of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24:417- 447.
6. Coyne, J.F., and L.H. Lott. 1976. Toxicity of substances in pine oleo-resin to southern pine beetles. J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 11:301-305.
7. Davis, T.S., and R.W. Hofstetter. 2012. Plant secondary chemistry mediates the performance of a nutritional symbiont associated with a tree-killing herbivore. Ecology 93:421-429.
8. Davis, T.S., K. Jarvis, K. Parise, and R.W. Hofstetter. 2011. Oleo-resin exudation quantity increases and viscosity declines following a fire event in a ponderosa pine ecosystem. J. Ariz. Nev. Acad. Sci. 43:6-11.
9. Ellison, A.M., M.S. Bank, B.D. Clinton, E.A. Colburn, K. Elliott, C.R. Ford, D.R. Foster, et al. 2005. Loss of foundation species: Consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3:479-486.
10. Gaylord, M.L. 2004. Bark beetle and tree physiology seasonal patterns in Northern Arizona. MS thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ. 110 p.
11. Gaylord, M.L., R.W. Hofstetter, T.E. Kolb, and M.R. Wagner. 2011. Limited response of ponderosa pine bole defenses to wounding and fungi. Tree Physiol. 31:428-437.
12. Gaylord, M.L., T.E. Kolb, K.F. Wallin, and M.R. Wagner. 2007. Seasonal dynamics of tree growth, physiology, and resin defenses in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Can. J. For. Res. 37:1173-1181.
13. Haack, R.A., R.C. Wilkinson, and J.L. Foltz. 1987. Plasticity in life history traits of the bark beetle Ips calligraphus as influenced by phloem thickness. Oecologia 72:32-38.
14. Huisinga, K.D., D.C. Laughlin, P.Z. Fulé, J.D. Springer, and C.M. McGlone. 2005. Effects of an intense prescribed fire on understory vegetation in a mixed conifer forest. J. Torr. Bot. Soc. 132:590-601.
15. Klepzig, K.D., E.L. Kruger, E.B. Smalley, and K.F. Raffa. 1995. Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:601-626.
16. Kolb, T.E., K.A. Holmberg, M.R. Wagner, and J.E. Stone. 1998. Regulation of ponderosa pine foliar physiology and insect resistance mechanisms by basal area treatments. Tree Physiol. 18:375-381.
17. Kolb, T.E., N. Guerard, R.W. Hofstetter, and M.R. Wagner. 2006. Attack preference of Ips pini on Pinus ponderosa in northern Arizona: Tree size and bole position. Agr. For. Entomol. 8:295-303.
18. Latta, R.G., and Y.B. Linhart. 1997. Path analysis of natural selection on plant chemistry: The xylem resin of ponderosa pine. Oecologia 109:251-258.
19. Latta, R.G., Y.B. Linhart, M.A. Snyder, and L. Lundquist. 2003. Patterns of variation and correlation in the monoterpene composition of xylem oleoresin within populations of ponderosa pine. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31:451- 465.
20. Laughlin, D.C., J.D. Bakker, M.T. Stoddard, M.L. Daniels, J.D. Springer, C.N. Gildar, A.M. Green, and W.W. Covington. 2004. Toward reference conditions: Wildfire effects on flora in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 199:137-152.
21. Lombardero, M.J., M. Alonso-Rodríguez, and E.P. Roca-Posada. 2012. Tree insects and pathogens display opposite tendencies to attack native vs. non-native pines. For. Ecol. Manage. 281:121-129.
22. Lombardero, M.J., M.P. Ayres, P.L. Lorio Jr., and J.J. Ruel. 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible defenses of Pinus taeda. Ecol. Lett. 3:329-339.
23. Lorio, P.L. Jr., R.A. Sommers, C.A. Blanche, J.D. Hodges, and T.E. Nebeker. 1990. Modeling pine resistance to bark beetles based on growth and differentiation balance principles. P. 402-409 in Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress, Dixon, R.K., R.S. Meldahl, G.A. Ruark, and W.G. Warren (eds.). Timber Press, Portland OR. 8 p.
24. McDonald, P.M., and C.N. Skinner. 1989. Local volume tables for young-growth conifers on a high-quality site in the northern Sierra Nevada. USDA For. Serv., Res. Note PSW-404.
25. McDowell, N.G., H.A. Adams, J.D. Bailey, and T.E. Kolb. 2007. The role of stand density on growth efficiency, leaf area index, and resin flow in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Can. J. For. Res. 37:343-355.
26. Monserud, R.A., and J.D. Marshall. 1999. Allometric crown relations in three northern Idaho conifer species. Can. J. For. Res. 29:521-535.
27. Neary, D.G., S.T. Overby, and S.M. Haase. 2003. Effects of fire interval restoration on carbon and nitrogen in sedimentary- and volcanic-derived soils of the Mogollon Rim, Arizona. USDA For. Serv., Proc. RMRS-P-29.
28. Paine, T.D., K.F. Raffa, and T.C. Harrington. 1997. Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and love host conifer. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:179-206.
29. Raffa, K.F., and A.A. Berryman. 1982. Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environ. Entomol. 11:486-492.
30. Raffa, K.F., and A.A. Berryman. 1983. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 53:27-49.
31. Shrimpton, D.M., and A.J. Thomson. 1985. Relationship between phloem thickness and lodgepole pine growth characteristics. Can. J. For. Res. 15:1004-1008.
32. Squillace, A.E. 1971. Inheritance of monoterpene composition in cortical oleoresin of slash pine. For. Sci. 17:381-387.
33. Swetnam, T.W., C.D. Allen, and J.L. Betancourt. 1999. Applied historical ecology: Using the past to manage for the future. Ecol. Appl. 9:1189-1206.
34. Veenhuis, J.E. 2002. Effects of wildfire on the hydrology of Capulin and Rito de los Frijoles canyons, Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico. US Geol. Surv., WRIR-02-4152.
35. Warren, J.M., H.L. Allen, and F.L. Booker. 1999. Mineral nutrition, resin flow, and phloem phytochemistry in loblolly pine. Tree Physiol. 19:655-663.
36. Wilcox, B.P., B.D. Newman, D. Brandes, D.W. Davenport, and K. Reid. 1997. Runoff from a semi-arid ponderosa pine hillslope in New Mexico. Water Resource Res. 33:2301-2314.
37. Zausen, G.L., T.E. Kolb, J.D. Bailey, and M.R. Wagner. 2005. Long-term impacts of stand management on ponderosa pine physiology and bark beetle abundance in northern Arizona: A replicated landscape study. For. Ecol. Manage. 218:291-305.