Tangible autonomous interfaces (TAIs): Exploring autonomous behaviours in TUIs

TEI 2014 - 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-8

  Nowacka, Diana ^a   Kirk, David ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autonomous user interfaces; Design framework; Tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

DESIGN FRAMEWORKS; INTERFACE INTERACTION; SMART OBJECTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR; TANGIBLE OBJECTS; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES; USER PERFORMANCE;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84897531605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2540930.2540942     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bartindale, T., Sheikh, A., Taylor, N., Wright, P., and Olivier, P. Storycrate: Tabletop storyboarding for live film production. In Proc. of CHI 2012, 169-178.
2. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O., and Mahmud, A. A. Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 2 (2009), 195-204.
3. Braitenberg, V. Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. Bradford Books. University Press Group Limited, 1986.
4. Breazeal, C. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002.
5. Dautenhahn, K. The role of interactive conceptions of intelligence and life in cognitive technology. In Proc. CT 1997, 33-43.
6. Dautenhahn, K. Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots. In Proc. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2002), 192-197.
7. Dennett, D. Consciousness Explained. Penguin, 1993.
8. Dillon, A. Designing Usable Electronic Text: Ergonomic Aspects of Human Information Usage. Taylor & Francis, 1994.
9. Dolske, J. Roomba posse on Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/dolske/ 3384646728/, 2013. [Online; accessed 21-November-2013].
10. Fishkin, K. P. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5 (2004), 347-358.
11. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proc. of CHI 2003, 233-240.
12. Heider, F., and Simmel, M. An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 57, 2 (1944), 243-259.
13. Helmes, J., Taylor, A. S., Cao, X., Höök, K., Schmitt, P., and Villar, N. Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy. In Proc. of TEI 2011, 145-152.
14. Ishii, H., and Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. of CHI 1997, 234-241.
15. Krzywinski, A., Mi, H., Chen, W., and Sugimoto, M. Robotable: a tabletop framework for tangible interaction with robots in a mixed reality. In Proc. of ACE 2009, 107-114.
16. Levy, D. Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. HarperCollins, 2007.
17. Maes, P. Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (Nov. 1995), 108-114.
18. Nowacka, D., Ladha, K., Hammerla, N. Y., Jackson, D., Ladha, C., Rukzio, E., and Olivier, P. Touchbugs: Actuated tangibles on multi-touch tables. In Proc. of CHI 2013, 759-762.
19. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
20. Roe, D. B., and Jay G. Wilpon, E. f. t. N. A. o. S. Voice Communication Between Humans and Machines. The National Academies Press, 1994.
21. Romero, M., Pousman, Z., and Mateas, M. Tableau machine: an alien presence in the home. In Proc. of CHI 2006, 1265-1270.
22. Satyanarayanan, M. Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges. Personal Communications, IEEE 8, 4 (2001), 10-17.
23. Schmitz, M. Concepts for life-like interactive objects. In Proc. of TEI 2011, 157-164.
24. Sung, J.-Y., Guo, L., Grinter, R. E., and Christensen, H. I. "my roomba is rambo": intimate home appliances. In Proc. of UbiComp 2007, 145-162.
25. Taylor, A. S. Machine intelligence. In Proc. of CHI 2009, 2109-2118.
26. Usher, N. Pareidolic Robot. http://www.di12.rca.ac.uk/projects/ pareidolic-robot, 2012. [Online; accessed 30-June-2013].
27. Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Lankes, M., and Tscheligi, M. The usus evaluation framework for human-robot interaction. 11-26.
28. Wyeth, P. Agency, tangible technology and young children. In Proc. of IDC 2007, 101-104.