DnaJ-promoted binding of DnaK to multiple sites on σ32 in the presence of ATP

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 196, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1694-1703

  Noguchi, Aki ^a   Ikeda, Ayami ^a   Mezaki, Moeka ^a   Fukumori, Yoshihiro ^a   Kanemori, Masaaki ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN DNAJ; PROTEIN DNAK; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR DELTA 32; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEL FILTRATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; WILD TYPE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP40 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; SIGMA FACTOR;

EID: 84897518742     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: 10985530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01197-13     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Mayer MP, Bukau B. 2005. Hsp70 chaperones. Cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62:670-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6.
2. Genevaux P, Georgopoulos C, Kelley WL. 2007. The Hsp70 chaperone machines of Escherichia coli: a paradigm for the repartition of chaperone functions. Mol. Microbiol. 66:840-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05961.x.
3. Kampinga HH, Craig EA. 2010. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11: 579-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2941.
4. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. 2011. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475:324-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10317.
5. Liberek K, Marszalek J, Ang D, Georgopoulos C, Zylicz M. 1991. Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:2874-2878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.7.2874.
6. Langer T, Lu C, Echols H, Flanagan J, Hayer MK, Hartl FU. 1992. Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding. Nature 356:683-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/356683a0.
7. Szabo A, Langer T, Schröder H, Flanagan J, Bukau B, Hartl FU. 1994. The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system-DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:10345-10349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.22.10345.
8. Suzuki H, Ikeda A, Tsuchimoto S, Adachi K, Noguchi A, Fukumori Y, Kanemori M. 2012. Synergistic binding of DnaJ and DnaK chaperones to heat shock transcription factor σ32 ensures its characteristic high metabolic instability. Implications for heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70)-Hsp40 mode of function. J. Biol. Chem. 287:19275-19283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.331470.
9. Straus DB, Walter WA, Gross CA. 1987. The heat shock response of E. coli is regulated by changes in the concentration of σ32. Nature 329:348-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/329348a0.
10. Yura T, Kanemori M, Morita MT. 2000. The heat shock response: regulation and function, p 3-18. In Storz G, Hengge-Aronis R (ed), Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
11. Guisbert E, Yura T, Rhodius VA, Gross CA. 2008. Convergence of molecular, modeling, and systems approaches for an understanding of the Escherichia coli heat shock response. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72:545-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00007-08.
12. Gottesman S. 2003. Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19:565-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.110701.153228.
13. Herman C, Thévenet D, D'Ari R, Bouloc P. 1995. Degradation of σ32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:3516-3520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.8.3516.
14. Tomoyasu T, Gamer J, Bukau B, Kanemori M, Mori H, Rutman AJ, Oppenheim AB, Yura T, Yamanaka K, Niki H, Hiraga S, Ogura T. 1995. Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent protease which degrades the heat-shock transcription factor σ32. EMBO J. 14: 2551-2560.
15. Kanemori M, Nishihara K, Yanagi H, Yura T. 1997. Synergistic roles of HslVU and other ATP-dependent proteases in controlling in vivo turnover of σ32 and abnormal proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179: 7219-7225.
16. Kanemori M, Yanagi H, Yura T. 1999. Marked instability of the σ32 heat shock transcription factor at high temperature. Implications for heat shock regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22002-22007.
17. Tilly K, Spence J, Georgopoulos C. 1989. Modulation of stability of the Escherichia coli heat shock regulatory factor σ32. J. Bacteriol. 171:1585-1589.
18. Straus D, Walter W, Gross CA. 1990. DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE heat shock proteins negatively regulate heat shock gene expression by controlling the synthesis and stability of σ32. Genes Dev. 4:2202-2209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.4.12a.2202.
19. Gamer J, Bujard H, Bukau B. 1992. Physical interaction between heat shock proteins DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE and the bacterial heat shock transcription factor σ32. Cell 69:833-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90294-M.
20. Liberek K, Galitski TP, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. 1992. The DnaK chaperone modulates the heat shock response of Escherichia coli by binding to the σ32 transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:3516-3520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.8.3516.
21. Liberek K, Georgopoulos C. 1993. Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli heat shock response by the DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90:11019-11023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.23.11019.
22. Liberek K, Wall D, Georgopoulos C. 1995. The DnaJ chaperone catalytically activates the DnaK chaperone to preferentially bind the σ32 heat shock transcriptional regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:6224-6228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.14.6224.
23. Gamer J, Multhaup G, Tomoyasu T, Mccarty JS, Rüdiger S, Schönfeld H-J, Schirra C, Bujard H, Bukau B. 1996. A cycle of binding and release of the DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE chaperones regulates activity of the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor σ32. EMBO. J. 15:607-617.
24. Kim S-Y, Sharma S, Hoskins JR, Wickner S. 2002. Interaction of the DnaK and DnaJ chaperone system with a native substrate, P1 RepA. J. Biol. Chem. 277:44778-44783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M206176200.
25. Rodriguez F, Arsène-Ploetze F, Rist W, Rüdiger S, Schneider-Mergener J, Mayer MP, Bukau B. 2008. Molecular basis for regulation of the heat shock transcription factor σ32 by the DnaK and DnaJ chaperones. Mol. Cell 32:347-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.016.
26. Horikoshi M, Yura T, Tsuchimoto S, Fukumori Y, Kanemori M. 2004. Conserved region 2.1 of Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor σ32 is required for modulating both metabolic stability and transcriptional activity. J. Bacteriol. 186:7474-7480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.22.7474-7480.2004.
27. Kusukawa N, Yura T. 1988. Heat shock protein GroE of Escherichia coli: key protective roles against thermal stress. Genes Dev. 2:874-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2.7.874.
28. Ishiai M, Wada C, Kawasaki Y, Yura T. 1992. Mini-F plasmid mutants able to replicate in Escherichia coli deficient in the DnaJ heat shock protein. J. Bacteriol. 174:5597-5603.
29. Nagai H, Yuzawa H, Kanemori M, Yura T. 1994. A distinct segment of the σ32 polypeptide is involved in DnaK-mediated negative control of the heat shock response in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:10280-10284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.22.10280.
30. Tobe T, Ito K, Yura T. 1984. Isolation and physical mapping of temperature-sensitive mutants defective in heat-shock induction of proteins in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 195:10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00332716.
31. Cajo GC, Horne BE, Kelley WL, Schwager F, Georgopoulos C, Genevaux P. 2006. The role of the DIF motif of the DnaJ (Hsp40) co-chaperone in the regulation of the DnaK (Hsp70) chaperone cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 281:12436-12444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M511192200.
32. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
33. Sawano A, Miyawaki A. 2000. Directed evolution of green fluorescent protein by a new versatile PCR strategy for site-directed and semi-random mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:e78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.16.e78.
34. Paek K-H, Walker GC. 1987. Escherichia coli dnaK null mutants are inviable at high temperature. J. Bacteriol. 169:283-290.
35. Bukau B, Walker GC. 1989. Cellular defects caused by deletion of the Escherichia coli dnaK gene indicate roles for heat shock protein in normal metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 171:2337-2346.
36. Wall D, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C. 1995. The conserved G/F motif of the DnaJ chaperone is necessary for the activation of the substrate binding properties of the DnaK chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 270:2139-2144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.5.2139.
37. Zhuravleva A, Clerico EM, Gierasch M. 2012. An interdomain energetic tug-of-war creates the allosterically active state in Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Cell 151:1296-1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.002.
38. Kityk R, Kopp J, Sinning I, Mayer MP. 2012. Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol. Cell 48: 863-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.023.
39. Schmid D, Baici A, Gehring H, Christen P. 1994. Kinetics of molecular chaperone action. Science 263:971-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8310296.
40. Willmund F, del Alamo M, Pechmann S, Chen T, Albanèse V, Dammer EB, Peng J, Frydman J. 2013. The cotranslational function of ribosomeassociated Hsp70 in eukaryotic protein homeostasis. Cell 152:196-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.001.