Mixture of mutually exciting processes for viral diffusion

30th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2013

Volumn , Issue PART 1, 2013, Pages 660-668

  Yang, Shuang Hong ^a   Zha, Hongyuan ^b  

^a TWITTER INC   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MIXTURES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BLOGOSPHERES; DIFFUSION NETWORKS; MEAN-FIELD; ON-LINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; POINT PROCESS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; VARIATIONAL INFERENCE;

DIFFUSION;

EID: 84897487970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bacrya, E., Delattreb, S., Hoffmannc, M. and Muzyd, J.F. Modeling microstructure noise with mutually exciting point processes. Quantitative Finance, 2012.
2. Blei, D.M. and Lafferty, J.D. Dynamic topic models. In ICML 2006, pp. 113-120, 2006.
3. Crane, R. and Sornette, D. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 105:15649-15653, 2008.
4. Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Balduzzi, D., and Schölkopf, B. Uncovering the temporal dynamics of diffusion networks. In ICML 2011, pp. 561-568, 2011.
5. Gomez-Rodriguez, M. and Schölkopf, B. Submodular inference of diffusion networks from multiple trees. In ICML 2012, 2012.
6. Guttorp, P. and Thorarinsdottir, T.L. Bayesian inference for non-markovian point processes. In Advances and Challenges in Space-time Modelling of Natural Events, pp. 79-102, 2012.
7. Hawkes, A.G. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58:83-90, 1971.
8. Kvam, P. and Day, D. The multivariate Polya distribution in combat modeling. Naval Research Logistics, 48:1-17, 2001. (Pubitemid 32137146)
9. Lehmann, J., Gonçalves, B., Ramasco, J., and Cattuto, C. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In World Wide Web 2012, pp. 251-260, 2012.
10. Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., and Kleinberg, J. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In ACM SIGKDD 2009, pp. 497-506, 2009.
11. Liniger, T. Multivariate hawkes processes. ETH Doctoral Dissertation No. 18403, 2009.
12. Meyers, S. and Leskovec, J. On the convexity of latent social network inference. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, 2010.
13. Mohler, G.O., Short, M.B., Brantingham, P.J., Schoenberg, F.P., and Tita, G. E. Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(493):100-108, 2011.
14. Ogata, Y. On Lewis' simulation method for point processes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 27(1):23-31, Jan 1981. (Pubitemid 11481229)
15. Pan, W., Dong, W., Cebrian, M., Kim, T., and Pentland, A. Modeling dynamical influence in human interaction. MIT Media Lab technical report March 2011.
16. Ryu, H., Lease, M., and Woodward, N. Finding and exploring memes in social media. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, HT '2, pp. 295-304, 2012.
17. Snowsill, T. M., Fyson, N., De Bie, T., and Cristianini, N. Refining causality: who copied from whom? In ACM SIGKDD 2011, pp. 466-474, 2011.
18. Wortman, J. Viral marketing and the diffusion of trends on social networks. UPenn Technical Report MS-CIS-08-19, May 2008.
19. Ypma, RJ, Bataille, AM, Stegeman, A, Koch, G, Wallinga, J, and van Ballegooijen, WM. Unravelling transmission trees of infectious diseases by combining genetic and epidemiological data. Proc. of the Royal Society B, 279:444-450, Feb 2012.