Indigenous peoples in UN REDD+ negotiations: "Importing power" and lobbying for rights through discursive interplay management

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Wallbott, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Institutional interaction; Institutional linkage; International negotiations; Norm entrepreneurs; Peoples; UNDRIP

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENTREPRENEUR; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; POWER RELATIONS; SYNERGISM; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84897477087     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06111-190121     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Accra Caucus on Forests and Climate Change, Accion Ecologica, Friends of the Earth International, Indigenous Peoples' Forum on Climate Change, Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation UK, and Tebtebba Foundation. 2008. Indigenous Peoples, local communities and NGOs outraged at the removal of rights from UNFCCC decision on REDD. Tebtebba, Baguio City, Philippines. [online] URL: http://www.tebtebba.org/index.php/ content/122-no-rights-no-redd
2. Alter, K. J., and S. Meunier. 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1):13-24. http://dx. doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090033
3. Andresen, S., and S. Agrawala. 2002. Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime. Global Environmental Change 12(1):41-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0959-3780(01)00023-1
4. Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations 12(4):467-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066106069321
5. Bäckstrand, K., and E. Lövbrand. 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics 6(1):50-75.
6. Baez, S. 2011. The "right" REDD framework: national laws that best protect indigenous rights in a global REDD regime. Fordham Law Review 80:821-875.
7. Benvenisti, E., and G. W. Downs. 2007. The empire's new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review 60(2):595-631.
8. Bernauer, T., and C. Betzold. 2012. Civil society in global environmental governance. Journal of Environment and Development 21(1):62-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1070496511435551
9. Bernstein, S. 2002. Liberal environmentalism and global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2 (3):1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152638002320310509
10. Bernstein, S., and B. Cashore. 2004. Non-state global governance: is forest certification a legitimate alternative to a global forest convention? Pages 33-63 in J. J. Kirton and M. J. Trebilcock, editors. Hard choices, soft law. Voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
11. Betsill, M., and E. Corell, editors. 2008. NGO diplomacy: the influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
12. Biermann, F., and B. Siebenhüner. 2009. The role and relevance of international bureaucracies: setting the stage. Pages 1-14 in F. Biermann and B. Siebenhüner, editors. Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262012744.003.0001
13. Bosquet, B. 2012. Overview of the FCPF and engagement with indigenous peoples. Presentation at the Asia Indigenous Peoples Dialogue, 24-28 September, Chaing Mai, Thailand. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. [online] URL: http://www. forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/Documents/tagged/FCPF% 20Overview%20EN.pdf
14. Braithwaite, J., and P. Drahos. 2000. Global business regulation. University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Brühl, T. 2003. Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Akteure internationaler Umweltverhandlungen. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
16. Burgiel, S. W., and P. Wood. 2012. Witness, architect, detractor. The evolving role of NGOs in international environmental negotiations. Pages 127-148 in P. Chasek and L. M. Wagner, editors. The roads from Rio. Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations. Routledge, London, UK.
17. Campbell, C. 2009. Distinguishing the power of agency from agentic power: a note on Weber and the "black box" of personal agency. Sociological Theory 27(4):407-418. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01355.x
18. Campese, J., T. Sunderland, T. Greiber, and G. Oviedo, editors. 2009. Rights-based approaches. Exploring issues and opportunities for conservation. CIFOR and IUCN, Bogor, Indonesia.
19. Canessa, A. 2007. Who is indigenous? Self-identification, indigeneity, and claims to justice in contemporary Bolivia. Urban Anthropology 36(3):195-237.
20. Cashore, B. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15 (4):503-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00199
21. Cashore, B., G. Auld, S. Bernstein, and C. McDermott. 2007. Can non-state governance 'ratchet up' global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 16(2):158-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00560.x
22. Checkel, J. T. 2001. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization 55(3):553-588. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1162/00208180152507551
23. Climate and Capitalism. 2010. Documents of the World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth. South Branch Publications. [online] URL: http://readingfromtheleft. com/PDF/CochabambaDocuments.pdf
24. Consejo Coordinator Nacional Indígena Salvadreño (CCNIS). 2009. Declaration on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples of El Salvador. [online] URL: http://www.tebtebba.org/index.php/ all-resources/category/84-redd-and-ad-and-indigenous-peoples Coordinadore de las Organizaciones Indigenas de la Cuenca
25. Amazonica (COICA). 2009. SBSTA Submission. COICA, Quito, Ecuador. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/ smsn/ngo/112.pdf
26. Corbera, E., and H. Schroeder. 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy 14 (2):89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
27. Drezner, D. W. 2009. The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1):65-70. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/S1537592709090100
28. Falkner, R. 2003. Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics 3(2):72-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152638003322068227
29. Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52 (4):887-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
30. Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 2001. Taking stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4:391-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
31. Folke, C. 2004. Traditional knowledge in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9(3): 7. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7/
32. Forest Peoples Programme (FPP). 2009. Views on issues relating to indigenous peoples and local communities for the development and application of methodologies. FPP, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/104. pdf
33. Forest Peoples Programme (FPP). 2010b. FPP submission to Oslo Partnership Agreement (draft). FPP, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www.indigenousportal.com/Climate-Change/ FPP-submission-to-Oslo-Partnership-Agreement-draft.html
34. Forest Peoples Programme (FPP). 2010a. REDD+ partnership launched amid concerns over indigenous peoples' rights while UN negotiations resume. FPP, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www.forestpeoples.org/nl/node/1299
35. Forsyth, T., and T. Sikor. 2013. Forests, development and the globalisation of justice. Geographical Journal 179(2):114-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12006
36. Gamson, W., and D. Mayer. 1996. Framing political opportunity. Pages 275-290 in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. Zald, editors. Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press, New York New York, USA. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987.014
37. Government of Bolivia. 2010. Submission by the plurinational state of Bolivia to the ad-hoc working group on long-term cooperative action. Draft Negotiating Text. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/ad_hoc_working_groups/ lca/application/pdf/bolivia_awglca10.pdf
38. Governments of Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica. 2005. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Montréal, Québec, Canada. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/ docs/2005/cop11/eng/misc01.pdf
39. Gulbrandsen, L. H. 2004. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environmental Politics 4(2):75-99. http://dx.doi. org/10.1162/152638004323074200
40. Gupta, J., and L. Ringius. 2001. The EU's climate leadership: reconciling ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1(2):281-299. http://dx. doi.org/10.1023/A:1010185407521
41. Haas, P. M. 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international coordination. International Organization 46 (1):1-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
42. Hall, P. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3):275-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422246
43. Hardin, R. 1998. Institutional morality. Pages 126-153 in R. E. Goodin, editor. The theory of institutional design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511558320.006
44. Holzscheiter, A. 2005. Discourse as capability: non-state actors' capital in global governance. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 33:723-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030301
45. Humphreys, D. 2004. Redefining the issues: NGO influence on international forest negotiations. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2):51-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152638004323074192
46. Humphreys, D. 2008. NGO influence on international policy on forest conservation and the trade in forest products. Pages 149-176 in M. Betsill and E. Corell, editors. NGO diplomacy: the influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
47. Indigenous Peoples' Global Summit on Climate Change (IPGSCC). 2009. The Anchorage Declaration. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/168. pdf International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the
48. Tropical Forests (IAIP). 2009. Submission to SBSTA, on behalf of International Indigenous Peoples' Forum on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/ docs/2009/smsn/ngo/108.pdf
49. International Indigenous Peoples' Forum on Climate Change (IIPFCC). 2009. Proposed language for negotiating text. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/ smsn/ngo/167.pdf
50. Jintiach, J. C. 2011. Indigenous peoples participation at UNFCCC. Presented at SBI In-session Workshop to further develop ways to enhance the participation of observer organizations. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/files/ conference_programme/application/pdf/110608_ipo_afternoon_sbi_ insession_wkshop.pdf
51. Jupille, J., and D. Snidal. 2005. The choice of international institutions: cooperation, alternatives and strategies. http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1008945
52. Katzenstein, P., editor. 1996. The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
53. Klotz, A. 1995. Norms in international relations. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
54. Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. Sage, London, UK.
55. Krasner, S. 1983. International regimes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
56. Laird, S. A., editor. 1986. Biodiversity and traditional knowledge. Equitable Partnerships in Practice. Earthscan, London, UK.
57. Lehr, D. 2013. Indigenous peoples must be represented in REDD+ partnership. Indigenous Peoples' Climate Change Portal, Baguio City, Philippines. [online] URL: http://www.indigenousclimate. org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=201% 3Aindigenous-peoples-must-be-represented-in-reddpartnership& catid=3%3Anews&lang=en
58. McAdam, D., J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald. 1996. Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes-toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. Pages 1-21 in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald, editors. Comparative perspectives on social movements. Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
59. McDermott, C. L., L. Coad, A. Helfgott, and H. Schroeder. 2012. Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science and Policy 21:63-72. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.007
60. Oberthür, S., and T. Gehring. 2011. Institutional interaction: ten years of scholarly development. Pages 25-58 in S. Oberthür, and O. S. Stokke, editors. Managing institutional complexity. Regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015912.003.0002
61. Oberthür, S., and O. S. Stokke, editors. 2011a. Managing institutional complexity. Regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015912.001.0001
62. Oberthür, S., and O. S. Stokke. 2011b. Conclusions: decentralized interplay management in an evolving interinstitutional order. Pages 313-341 in S. Oberthür, and O. S. Stokke, editors. Managing institutional complexity. Regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015912.003.0012
63. Orsini, A. 2013. Multi-forum non-state actors: navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Global Environmental Politics 13(3):34-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ GLEP_a_00182
64. Pattberg, P. 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5(2): 175-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10784-005-0951-y
65. Payne, R. A. 2001. Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations 7(1):37-61. http://dx. doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007001002
66. Raustiala, K., and D. G. Victor. 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58(2):277-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036
67. Raymond, C. M, B. A. Bryan, D. H. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68(5):1301-1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
68. Reinecke, S., T. Pistorius, and M. Pregernig. 2014. UNFCCC and the REDD+ partnership from a networked governance perspective. Environmental Science & Policy 35:30-39. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.015
69. Risse, T., S. Ropp, and K. Sikkink, editors. 1999. The power of human rights. International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511598777
70. Sanz, M. J. 2007. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries (REDD). Presented at COM+ Media Training, Vienna, 29 August. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/intersessional/awg_4_and_dialogue_4/ press/application/pdf/awg4_com_plus_red.pdf
71. Schroeder, H. 2008. Analysing biosafety and trade through the lens of institutional interplay. Pages 49-70 in O. R. Young, W. B. Chambers, J. A. Kim, and C. ten Have, editors. Institutional interplay. Biosafety and trade. United Nations University Press, New York, New York, USA.
72. Schroeder, H. 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements. Politics, Law and Economics 10(4):317-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9138-2
73. Selin, H., and S. D. VanDeveer. 2003. Mapping institutional linkages in European air pollution politics. Global Environmental Governance 3(3):14-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152638003322469268
74. Stokke, O. S., and S. Oberthür. 2011. Introduction: institutional interaction in global environmental change. Pages 1-23 in S. Oberthür, and O. S. Stokke, editors. Managing institutional complexity. Regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi. org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015912.003.0001
75. Tauli-Corpuz, V., and A. Lynge. 2008. Impact of climate change mitigation measures on indigenous peoples and on their territories and lands. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/ unpfii/documents/E_C19_2008_10.pdf
76. Tebtebba. 2008-2009. Summary report of the South East Asia Indigenous Peoples Regional Consultation on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: https://unfccc.int/files/methods/redd/ submissions/application/pdf/redd_20090217_tebtebba_southeast. pdf
77. Tebtebba. 2010. Mandaluyong Declaration of the Global Conference on Indigenous Women, Climate Change and REDD Plus. [online] URL: http://www.tebtebba.org/index.php/content/164-indigenous-womens-declaration-on-cc-and-redd
78. Terborgh, J. 2000. The fate of tropical forests: a matter of stewardship. Conservation Biology 14(5):1358-1361. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00136.x
79. Toledo, V. M., B. Ortiz-Espejel, L. Cortés, P. Moguel, and M. D. J. Ordoñez. 2003. The multiple use of tropical forests by indigenous peoples in Mexico: a case of adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 7(3): 9. [online] URL: http://www.consecol. org/vol7/iss3/art9
80. Underdal, A. 1994. Leadership theory. Rediscovering the arts of management. Pages 178-197 in W. Zartman, editor. International multilateral negotiation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
81. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006a. Background paper for the workshop on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries. UNFCCC, Rome, Italy. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/ methods_and_science/lulucf/items/3757.php
82. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006b. Issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries and recommendations on any further process. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2006/ MISC.5. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http:// unfccc.int/resource/docs/2006/sbsta/eng/misc05.pdf
83. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006c. Issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries and recommendations on any further process. Submissions from Parties. FCCC/SBSTA/2006/ MISC.5, Addendum. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2006/sbsta/eng/misc05a01.pdf
84. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007a. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01. pdf
85. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007c. Views on issues related to further steps under the Convention related to reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. Submissions from Parties, Addendum. UNFCCC, Bali, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/sbsta/eng/misc14a03. pdf
86. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007b. Views on the range of topics and other relevant information relating to reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries. FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2, Addendum. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/ resource/docs/2007/sbsta/eng/misc02a01.pdf
87. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2008. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. Conclusions. FCCC/SBSTA/2008/L.23. UNFCCC, Poznan, Poland. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/sbsta/eng/l23.pdf
88. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2009a. Ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the Convention, sixth session. FCCC/ AWGLCA/2009/INF.1. UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca6/eng/inf01. pdf
89. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2009b. Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. Draft decision-/CP.15, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/files/na/application/pdf/cop15_ddc_auv. pdf
90. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2010a. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session. UNFCCC, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf
91. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2010b. The Cancun Agreements. Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. UNFCCC, Cancun, Mexico. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01. pdf#page=2
92. United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Resolution A/RES/61/295. UNGA, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol= A/RES/61/295
93. United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). 2006. Fact sheet 1: indigenous peoples and identity. UNPFII, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://social. un.org/index/IndigenousPeoples/UNPFIISessions/PreviousSessions/ Fifth.aspx
94. Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., C. McDermott, M. J. Vijge, and B. Cashore. 2012. Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(6):646-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cosust.2012.10.005
95. Werksman, J. 2010. The legal character and legitimacy of the Cancun Agreements. World Resources Institute, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.wri.org/stories/2010/12/qalegal-character-and-legitimacy-cancun-agreements
96. Wiener, A. 2007. The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the state: sociological and normative approaches to 'interaction'. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(1):47-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230601122412
97. Young, O. R. 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45(3):281-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0020818300033117
98. Zelli, F., A. Gupta, and H. van Asselt. 2012. Horizontal institutional interlinkages. Pages 175-198 in F. Biermann and P. Pattberg, editors. Global environmental governance reconsidered: new actors, mechanisms and interlinkages. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.