Teaching STEM by design

Advances in Engineering Education

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Billiark, Kristen ^a   Hubelbank, Jeanne ^b   Oliva, Thomas ^c   Camesano, Terri ^d  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Evaluation Consulting   (United States)

^c Forest Grove Middle School   (United States)

^d Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Curriculum development; Engineering design process; Evaluation; K 12 outreach; Middle School

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DESIGN; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ACTIVE LEARNING; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS; EVALUATION; K12 OUTREACH; MIDDLE SCHOOL;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84897437435     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19411766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adelman, C. Women and Men of the Engineering Path. U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute for Science Education, 1998.
2. Ambrose, S, M Bridges, M DiPietro, M Lovett, and M K Norman. How Learning Works: 7 Research-based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
3. Anderson, Gary, and Kathryn Herr. "Scaling Up "Evidence-Based" Practices for Teachers is Profitable but Discredited Program." Educational Researcher Vol 40, No 6, 2011: 287-289.
4. Archer, L, J DeWitt, J Osborne, J Dillon, B Willis, and B Wong. "Science Aspirations, Captial, and Family Habitus: How Families Shape Children's Engagement and Identification with Science." American Journal of Educational Research, 2012: 881-908.
5. Atkin, J.M., Black, P, Coffey, J. "Professional Development." In Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards, by National Research Council, 79-96. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2001.
6. Bransford, John D, Ann L Brown, and Rodney R Cocking. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. Committee on Developments in Science of Learning. National Academy Press., 2000.
7. Braun, H, R Coley, Y Jia, and C Trapani. Exploring what works in science instruction: A look at the eighth-grade science classroom. Policy Information Report, Princeton, NJ: ETS Educational Testing Service, 2009.
8. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. Great Transitions: Preparing Adolescents for a New Century. Carnegie Corporation of New York, 1995.
9. Cobb, P., J. Confrey, A. diSessa, R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble. "Design experiments in educational research." Educational Researcher, 2003: 9-13.
10. Cochran-Smith, Marilyn, and Susan L. Lytle. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press, 2009.
11. Council, National Research. National Science Educationi Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1996.
12. Dana, Nancy, and Diane Yendel-Hoppey. The Reflective Educator's Guide to Classroom Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2009.
13. Douglas, Josh, Eric Iversen, and Chitra Kalyandurg. Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: An Analysis of Current Practices & Guidelines for the Future. ASEE Engineering K-12 Center, Washington, D.C.: ASEE American Society for Engineering Education, November 2004.
14. Duschel, et al. (Eds). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, K-8th Grade, National Research Council, 2007.
15. Dym, Clive L., and Patrick Little. Engineering Design: A project based introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
16. Education, Massachusetts Department of. Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education, 2006.
17. Ertas, Atila, and Jesse C. Jones. The Engineering Design Process. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
18. Garet, M, AC Porter, L Desimone, B Birman, and SY Kwang. "What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers." American Educational Research Journal, 2001: 915-945.
19. Gustafson, KL, and RM Branch. "Revisioning Models of Instructional Development." Educational Technology Research and Development, 1997: 73-89.
20. Hynes, MM. "Middle-school Teachers' Understanding and Teaching of the Engineering Design Process: A Look at Subject Matter and Pedagogical Content Knowledge." International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2012: 345-360.
21. Jonassen, David and Land, Susan. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
22. Katehi, L, G Pearson, and M (Eds) Feder. Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanindg the Status and Improving the Prospects. Committee on Understanding and Improving K-12 Engineering in the United States. National Research Council, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
23. Kuenzi, J. J. "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM): Background, Federal Policy and Legislative Action." Federation of American Sciences. March 21, 2008. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf (accessed October 27, 2011).
24. "Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework." Massachusetts Department of Education. October 2006. http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf (accessed October 28, 2011).
25. Molenda, M. "In search of the elusive ADDIE Model." Performance Improvement, 2003: 34-36.
26. National Research Council (NRC). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.
27. NSB National Science Board. Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing our Nation's Human Capital. NSB-10-33, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, May 5, 2010.
28. Opfer, D, and D Pedder. "Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning." Review of Educational Research, 2011: 376-407.
29. Penuel, WR, BJ Fishman, R Yamaguchi, and LP Gallagher. "What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies that Foster Curriculum Implementation." American Educational Research Journal, 2007: 921-958.
30. Robinson, M., M.S. Fadali, J. Carr, C. Maddux. "Engineering principles for high school students." 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1999.
31. Rockland, R., D.S. Bloom, J. Carpinelli, L Burr-Alexander, L.S. Hirsch, and H. Kimmel. "Advancing the 'E' in K-12 STEM Education." Journal of Technology Studies, 2010: 53-61.
32. Roth, K J, S L Drucker, H E Garnier, and C Lemmens. "National Center for Education Statistics." Five Countries: Results from the TIMMS 1999 Video Study Statistical Analysis Report. April 2006. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006011.pdf (accessed October 27, 2011).
33. Russell, G., G. Bradley. "Teachers' computer anxiety: implications for professional development." Education and Information Technologies, 1997: 17-30.
34. Schaefer-Zarkske, M.S., J.F.L.E. Carson, J.L.Lowell. "Teachers teaching teachers: linking K-12 engineering curricula with teacher professional development." ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.
35. Sciences, N.A.O. Harris poll reveals public perceptions of engineering. News and Events, National Academy of Engineering website, 1998.
36. Standards, National Research Council Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.
37. The Next Generation Science Standards. 2012. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards (accessed June 7, 2012).
38. Thom, M., Crossley, W., Thom, J.M. "The application of structured engineering design methodologies to engineering curriculum development." ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA: IEEE, November 2, 2002. S1A-12.
39. Watson, K.F., Steele, L., Vozzo, L. and Aubusson, P. "Changing the subject: Retraining teachers to teach science." Research in Science Education, 2007: 141-154.