Physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding clinical prediction rules for low back pain

Manual Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 142-151

  Haskins, Robin ^a   Osmotherly, Peter G ^a   Southgate, Erica ^a   Rivett, Darren A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical prediction rules; Low back pain; Physiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; AWARENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PREDICTION RULE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84897432467     PISSN: 1356689X     EISSN: 15322769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abboud P., Cabana M.D. Understanding barriers to the adoption of clinical decision rules. Ann Emerg Med 2001, 38(6):703-704.
2. Abrams D., Davidson M., Harrick J., Harcourt P., Zylinski M., Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2006, 11(1):46-53.
3. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 2001, 1(3):385-405.
4. Australian Physiotherapy Association. 2013.
5. Barlow G., Nathwani D., Myers E., Sullivan F., Stevens N., Duffy R., et al. Identifying barriers to the rapid administration of appropriate antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia. JAntimicrob Chemother 2008, 61(2):442-451.
6. Beneciuk J.M., Bishop M.D., George S.Z. Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2009, 89(2):114-124.
7. Bero L.A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J.M., Harvey E., Oxman A.D., Thomson M.A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. Br Med J 1998, 317(7156):465-468.
8. Beutel B.G., Trehan S.K., Shalvoy R.M., Mello M.J. The Ottawa knee rule: examining use in an academic emergency department. West J Emerg Med 2012, 13(4):366-372.
9. Björk J., Ekelund U., Ohlsson M. Risk predictions for individual patients from logistic regression were visualized with bar-line charts. JClin Epidemiol 2012, 65:335-342.
10. Borkan J.M.M., Cherkin D.C.P. An agenda for primary care research on low back pain. Spine 1996, 21(24):2880-2884.
11. Brehaut J.C., Graham I.D., Wood T.J., Taljaard M., Eagles D., Lott A., et al. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries. Med Decis Making 2010, 30(3):398-408.
12. Brehaut J.C., Stiell I.G., Graham I.D. Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule. Acad Emerg Med 2006, 13(4):413-420.
13. Brehaut J.C., Stiell I.G., Visentin L., Graham I.D. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Acad Emerg Med 2005, 12(10):948-956.
14. Cabana M.D., Rand C.S., Powe N.R., Wu A.W., Wilson M.H., Abboud P.A., et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. J.Am. Med. Assoc. 1999, 282(15):1458-1465.
15. Cabana M.D., Rushton J.L., Rush A.J. Implementing practice guidelines for depression: applying a new framework to an old problem. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2002, 24(1):35-42.
16. Costa L.D., Koes B.W., Pransky G., Borkan J., Maher C.G., Smeets R.J. Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update. Spine 2013, 38(2):148-156.
17. Côté A.M., Durand M.J., Tousignant M., Poitras S. Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: a qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators. JOccup Rehabil 2009, 19(1):94-105.
18. Creswell J.W., Miller D.L. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theor Into Pract 2000, 39(3):124-130.
19. Dennison C.R., Mendez-Tellez P.A., Wang W., Pronovost P.J., Needham D.M. Barriers to low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: survey development, validation, and results. Crit Care Med 2007, 35(12):2747-2754.
20. Eagles D., Stiell I.G., Clement C.M., Brehaut J., Taljaard M., Kelly A.M., et al. International survey of emergency physicians' awareness and use of the Canadian cervical-spine rule and the Canadian computed tomography head rule. Acad Emerg Med 2008, 15(12):1256-1261.
21. Edwards I., Jones M., Carr J., Braunack-Mayer A., Jensen G.M. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2004, 84(4):312-330.
22. Flynn T., Fritz J., Whitman J., Wainner R., Magel J., Rendeiro D., et al. Aclinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002, 27(24):2835-2843.
23. Foster N.E., Dziedzic K.S., Windt D.A.W.M., Fritz J.M., Hay E.M. Research priorities for non-pharmacological therapies for common musculoskeletal problems: nationally and internationally agreed recommendations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10(1):3.
24. Glynn P.E., Weisbach P.D. Case studies., clinical prediction rules. A physical therapy reference manual 2010, 226-232. [Chapter 9], Jones and Barlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
25. Graham I.D., Stiell I.G., Laupacis A., McAuley L., Howell M., Clancy M., et al. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?. Ann Emerg Med 2001, 37(3):259-266.
26. Graham I.D., Stiell I.G., Laupacis A., O'Connor A.M., Wells G.A. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med 1998, 5(2):134-140.
27. Greenwood J., Parsons M. Aguide to the use of focus groups in health care research: part 2. Contemp Nurse 2000, 9(2):181-191.
28. Grol R., Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004, 180(6):S57-S60.
29. Haskins R., Rivett D.A., Osmotherly P.G. Clinical prediction rules in the physiotherapy management of low back pain: a systematic review. Man Ther 2012, 17(1):9-21.
30. Henschke N., Maher C.G., Refshauge K.M., Das A., McAuley J.H. Low back pain research priorities: a survey of primary care practitioners. BMC Fam Pract 2007, 8:40.
31. Jette D.U., Bacon K., Batty C., Carlson M., Ferland A., Hemingway R.D., et al. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther 2003, 83(9):786-805.
32. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991, 45(3):214-222.
33. Krueger R.A., Casey M.A. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research 2009, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 4th ed.
34. Lang E.S., Wyer P.C., Haynes R.B. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med 2007, 49(3):355-363.
35. Larson E. Atool to assess barriers to adherence to hand hygiene guideline. Am J Infect Control 2004, 32(1):48-51.
36. Laslett M., Young S.B., Aprill C.N., McDonald B. Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: a validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests. Aust J Physiother 2003, 49(2):89-97.
37. Learman K., Showalter C., Cook C. Does the use of a prescriptive clinical prediction rule increase the likelihood of applying inappropriate treatments? A survey using clinical vignettes. Man Ther 2012, 17(6):538-543.
38. Legare F., Ratte S., Gravel K., Graham I.D. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73(3):526.
39. Magilvy J.K., Thomas E. Afirst qualitative project: qualitative descriptive design for novice researchers. JSpecialists Pediatr Nurs 2009, 14(4):298-300.
40. May S., Rosedale R. Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review. JMan Manipulative Ther 2009, 17(1):36-45.
41. Mays N., Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J 2000, 320(7226):50-52.
42. McCarthy C., Arnall F., Strimpakos N., Freemont A., Oldham J. The biopsychosocial classification of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev 2004, 9(1):17-30.
43. McGinn T., Wyer P., Wisnivesky J., Devereauz P.J., Stiell I., Richardson S., et al. Advanced topics in diagnosis: clinical prediction rules. Users' guides to the medical literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice 2008, 491-505. McGraw Hill Medical, USA. 2nd ed. G. Guyatt, D. Rennie, M.O. Meade, D.J. Cook (Eds.).
44. McKenzie R.A., May S. The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy 2003, Waikanae, New Zealand.
45. Mehta N.B. The doctors' challenge: how can we follow guidelines better. Cleveland Clinic J Med 2004, 71(2):81-82.
46. Morse J.M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2008, 1(2):13-22.
47. National Institute of Clinical Studies Identifying barriers to evidence uptake 2006, NICS, Melbourne, Australia.
48. Neergaard M.A., Olesen F., Andersen R.S., Sondergaard J. Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research?. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009, 9:52.
49. Petty N.J., Thomson O.P., Stew G. Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 1: introducing the philosophy of qualitative research. Man Ther 2012, 17:267-274.
50. Petty N.J., Thomson O.P., Stew G. Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Man Ther 2012, 17:378-384.
51. Pogorzelska M., Larson E.L. Assessment of attitudes of intensive care unit staff toward clinical practice guidelines. DCCN - Dimensions Crit Care Nurs 2008, 27(1):30-38.
52. Reilly B.M., Evans A.T. Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006, 144(3):201-209.
53. Riddle D.L. Classification and low back pain: a review of the literature and critical analysis of selected systems. Phys Ther 1998, 78(7):708-737.
54. Rubinson L., Wu A.W., Haponik E.F., Diette G.B. Why is it that internists do not follow guidelines for preventing intravascular catheter infections?. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005, 26(6):525-533.
55. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health 2000, 23(4):334-340.
56. Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010, 33(1):77-84.
57. Schouten J.A., Hulscher M.E.J.L., Natsch S., Kullberg B.J., Van Der Meer J.W.M., Grol R.P.T.M. Barriers to optimal antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia at hospitals: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2007, 16(2):143-149.
58. Stanton T.R., Hancock M.J., Maher C.G., Koes B.W. Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions. Phys Ther 2010, 90(6):843-854.
59. Stiell I.G., Brehaut J., Clement C., Grimshaw J., Graham I., Brison R., et al. Perceived barriers to the implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule and the Canadian CT head rule. Can J Emerg Med 2006, 8(3):206-207.
60. Stiell I.G., Greenberg G.H., McKnight R.D., Nair R.C., McDowell I., Worthington J.R. Astudy to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1992, 21(4):384-390.
61. Stiell I.G., Greenberg G.H., Wells G.A., McKnight R.D., Cwinn A.A., Cacciotti T., et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 1995, 26(4):405-413.
62. Swets J.A., Dawes R.M., Monahan J. Better decisions through science. Sci. Am 2000, 283(4):82-87.
63. Wells P.S., Hirsh J., Anderson D.R., Lensing A.W.A., Foster G., Kearon C., et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. The Lancet 1995, 345(8961):1326-1330.