Marijuana in the United States and the international drug control regime: Why what is promoted abroad is not applied at home

Crime, Law and Social Change

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 273-285

  Thoumi, Francisco E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897395236     PISSN: 09254994     EISSN: 15730751     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-013-9489-z     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Beyer, S. (2006). Ayahuasca in the supreme court, http://www. ayahuasca. com/news/ayahuasca-in-the-supreme-court/.
2. Bewley-Taylor, D. R., (2012). International drug control: consensus fractured, Cambridge University Press.
3. Garcia, M. J. (2013). International law and agreements: their effect upon U. S. law. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
4. Garvey, T. (2012). Medical Marijuana: the supremacy clause, federalism and the interplay between state and federal laws, Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, November 9.
5. McAllister, W. B. (2000). Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century. An international history. New York: Routledge.
6. Mikos, R. (2012). On the limits of federal supremacy: when States relax (or abandon) marijuana bans, downloadable without cost from Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn. com/abstract=2225945.
7. Musto, D. (1999). The American disease. Origins of narcotic control (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Taylor, S. Jr., (2013). Marijuana policy and presidential leadership: How to avoid a federal-state train wreck, Brookings Institution, Governance Studies.
9. UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). (2008). World drug report. Nueva York: United Nations.